When you build on the internet, you build on sand
A song to read by: “Blues Stay Away from Me,” by Jean Shephard What I’m reading: “The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is,” by Justin E. H. Smith After nearly a decade of utter dominion, the social platforms have finally begun to crack. At Twitter, the lunatics are running the asylum. Facebook, meanwhile, has become a glorified paddock for the elderly and the disabused. And Instagram, once the crown jewel of the Zuckerberg empire, now shuffles through identity crises like a paranoid croupier. As these companies contend with their mortality for what feels like the first time, their users — your handsome author included — have been forced to reckon with what the web might look like in their absence. This grim reimagining has the feel of a memento mori for the digital age, a reminder that nothing you post shall last. Indeed, for many, the platforms have served as a kind of public infrastructure upon which you could memorialize your life: Instagram catalogs your photos, Substack chronicles your writing, Spotify stores your music and Google preserves your correspondence. But what happens, as Terry asked in a particularly salient newsletter, if they disappear? Or rather, what happens when they disappear? The grand illusion of the internet is that it will endure, that it will act as a reliable storehouse for the artifacts of your life. The reality could not be farther from the truth — even the most recent evidence suggests the opposite. Vast portions of the internet disappear routinely — websites shut down, editors delete archives and people unplug. And when they do, reams of information evaporate into thin air. Or, perhaps the decision to remove yourself from the web was not your own. Last year, when Donald Trump found himself deplatformed from nearly every corner of the internet, the utter artifice of the web became much more transparent. While the politics of the decision were indisputable, the incident laid bare the fragility of life online — with the click of a button, the flip of a switch, the decision of a boardroom, everything you build on the internet can be erased. We have seen this in the information wars taking place in autocracies across the globe. In Russia and the Ukraine, but also in China, the Middle East, parts of South America and hotbeds in Africa, the internet can and increasingly is censored, manipulated or shut down. Once the web passed a certain point of sophistication, it became more centralized, more controllable, than pamphlets and magazines ever could be. Print will never dieThese thoughts crossed my mind on Wednesday as I read a magazine — a magazine made of paper, which I held in my hands. While I risk exposing my inner Luddite, I could not help but think that despite all the shortcomings of print, even the flimsiest sheath of paper is far more durable than anything online. And for all the flaws of analog media, it depended far less on a third-party distribution system whose whims dictated its fate. For the last decade, publishers have acted as if the foundations of the internet will hold forever, but the web has only shown a propensity for the opposite — it continues to splinter at accelerating speeds. The entire premise of the blockchain, for example, rests on abandoning the internet of the last decade in favor of a new model. Fortunately, the news media learned a critical lesson in the pivot to video era about the dangers of relying on fickle technology. Since then, publishers have operated with full awareness of the risks they chance by drawing too heavily from social media for revenue or traffic. The question now is: What lessons should we take from its collapse? If the social platforms that we built the internet upon are indeed mortal, should we continue building on them with abandon? And what precautions should we extend to the internet writ large? The dissolution of the platforms and the erosion of their users’ trust should serve as a lesson for publishers, as well as reporters and anyone else who now conducts their livelihood on the internet. Nothing lasts forever, but sand hardly lasts at all. Some Good Readin’— A fascinating case study about how Vogue used the Met Gala to turn fly-by readers into a more durable readership. (Adweek) — A portrait of a media company whose reputation has never been squeaky but whose business has never been stronger. (Adweek) — To my mind, the future of media looks a lot like Bloomberg. (Adweek) — Last Adweek plug, I promise: If you are unfamiliar with Dirt, change that by reading this, because it is one of the most intriguing new media companies right now. (Adweek) — I finally read the Pulitzer Prize-winning 9/11 story from the Atlantic, and it is amazing. Set some time aside, though! (The Atlantic) — Literally just read every Close Reads that The Times has made. (The New York Times) — Another great piece from Terry: There are just way too many things masquerading as trends. (Vox) Cover image: "Untitled,” by Mark Rothko |
Older messages
As subscriptions falter, commerce could soon follow
Thursday, May 5, 2022
Publishers relying on affiliate revenue could soon feel the pinch
Nuance is coming to a paywall near you
Thursday, April 28, 2022
Publishers are getting more sophisticated in how they gate their content
For publishers, Netflix is a warning
Thursday, April 21, 2022
Digital subscriptions could soon decline. Medialyte For publishers, Netflix is a warning By Mark Stenberg – 21 Apr 2022 – View online → A song to read by: "Á l'Amour Comme á la Guerre,"
Chasing paper: How the rising price of newsprint threatens the industry
Thursday, March 31, 2022
Print might be shrinking, but publishers still rely heavily on its ad revenue. Medialyte Chasing paper: How the rising price of newsprint threatens the industry By Mark Stenberg – 31 Mar 2022 – View
After wandering the desert, some publishers have found the digital promised land
Thursday, March 3, 2022
A years-ago gamble on the future of advertising is starting to pay off. Medialyte After wandering the desert, some publishers have found the digital promised land By Mark Stenberg – 03 Mar 2022 – View
You Might Also Like
Musk 👾 Read
Thursday, April 25, 2024
The Tesla Bros Strategy vs. Tesla 100 Million View this email in your browser Musk Read (No. 993). Thank you to each of the many brands that considered this product. Today's letter features six new
Computer Vision in the 1980s: Translating Visual Processing into Algorythms
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
A Quiet Decade of Key Advancements
🦅 This will increase your productivity 10x
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Will 𝕏 charge all new users? / New LinkedIn feature / Instagram profile Notes will be available to all Growth Notes by Hypefury 🦅 Together With Road to Freedom Hey Reader, Yannick here. In this
The end of Steph-LeBron-KD
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Wed, April 24th, 2024
Blockchain Groups Sue SEC Over Dealer Rule
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Plus Venezuela Adopts Tether Amid Sanction Concerns
Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit: Only a few spots left
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Connect with leaders from Spark Foundry, Assembly Global, HP and more
Shopify Dispatch Issue #448 - Low-cost items, PCI DSS v4 in Shopify
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Issue #448 - April 24th, 2024 Your Low-Cost Items Kevin Hillstrom writes about having a low-cost product that's loved by customers and keeping it low-cost. This is why Costco's $1.50 hot dog
[Webinar] Supercharge your social workflow with AI
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
AI Bootcamp–last chance to register!
The marketing and sales alignment you need now
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Today's Guide to the Marketing Jungle from Social Media Examiner... Presented by Social Media Marketing World logo Tomorrow is 🐧 World Penguin Day, Reader! Birds in formalwear… They always make the
Alternatives To Big Social
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
I like LinkedIn. I enjoy the connections I make there and I enjoy seeing where everyone is in their business life. But I've recently found that smaller social networks really where the true