Popular Information - Starbucks versus Gen Z
Too often, the media treats the news as a game. It's about who is up and who is down — who is winning and who is losing. Popular Information takes a different approach. We believe journalism should focus on people. We believe that at its best, journalism can have a positive impact on people's lives by holding the powerful accountable. That is the focus of today's edition. And it will continue to be the focus of Popular Information in the months and years to come. Our reporting has helped secure guaranteed sick leave for 170,000 restaurant workers, pressured large corporations to cut off donations to members of Congress who voted to overturn the election, and pushed Koch Industries to wind down its business in Russia. You can support this work — and help us do more of it — by becoming a paid subscriber. If the cost of this newsletter ($6/month or $50/year) would create any kind of financial strain, please stay on this free list. That's why we've taken down the paywall. But if you can afford it, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Last weekend, during an interview with The New York Times, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, said he believes employees at Starbucks' stores are pushing for unionization and better working conditions “primarily because Gen Z has a different view of the world.” These young employees, Schultz suggested, don't realize how good they already have it. The comment comes at a time when Starbucks workers have racked up a string of union victories, much to the frustration of the coffee giant. Over the last seven months, 152 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize across 30 states. The company has not taken to these unionization efforts well. It has repeatedly been accused of using union-busting tactics. “I’m not anti-union, but the history of unions is based on the fact that companies in the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s abused their people,” Schultz said during the interview. “We’re not in a coal mining business; we’re not abusing our people.” Schultz thinks people should focus on the benefits Starbucks provides to employees, like a free subscription to Spotify, which costs $10 per month. Schultz's view of the economy is ahistorical. Yes, some workers in mid-Century America faced abusive working conditions. But some workers face abusive working conditions today. And in mid-century America, corporations struck a much more equitable balance between profitability, executive compensation, and worker pay. In 1965, for example, American CEOs made 15 times more than the average worker. Today, the CEO-to-worker pay gap at America’s largest low-wage employers like Starbucks is closer to 670 to 1, according to a report published this month by the Institute for Policy Studies. The pay ratio at Starbucks is even more extreme. Starbucks’ former CEO, Kevin Johnson, raked in $20.4 million in 2021 –– 1,579 times more than what the typical Starbucks worker took home. The explosion in CEO pay began about 40 years ago. During that time, CEOs have not become significantly more skilled or productive. Rather, CEOs have convinced corporate boards to pay workers less and pay executives more. Starbucks is part of a broader trend. Since the mid-80s, corporate profits as a percentage of the economy have risen dramatically. Over the same period of time, wage income as a share of the economy has decreased. Research also shows that these trends were fueled by the decline of unionization. In the 50s, about one-third of the workforce was unionized. Today, it's only 10%. “The erosion of collective bargaining is the second largest factor that suppressed wage growth and fueled wage inequality over the last four decades,” the Economic Policy Institute reports. For Schultz, however, it’s Gen Z’s “view of the world” — not the underlying economic reality — that makes some Starbucks workers interested in joining a union. Is Starbucks breaking the law?During the interview, Schultz made clear that he returned temporarily as Starbucks CEO, at least in part, to thwart union activity. Schultz told the New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin that he doesn't believe unions, which Schultz refers to as a "third party," should have a role at Starbucks; he argues that he is engaged in "a battle for the hearts and minds of our people." But Schultz may have taken things too far. Schultz said that he needed to "customize new benefits" and "demonstrate to our people they can trust us." Sorkin asked Schultz if he could "ever see doing that and embracing the union as a part of it." "No," Schultz immediately replied. But federal labor law requires Starbucks, and every other company, to "bargain in good faith about wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment" with a union. Workers United has already won union votes at many stores, and votes at dozens of additional stores are scheduled. Those pending votes create more potential problems for Schultz. Under federal law, employers must not "interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees" considering whether to exercise their right to form a union. Employers can express their opposition to unionization but cannot "convey the message that selecting a union would be futile." Schultz also said that if Starbucks became unionized, "customer experience will be significantly challenged and less than." Asked why a union would damage the customer experience, Schultz pleaded with Sorkin to change the subject. Federal law prohibits employers from threatening "employees with adverse consequences, such as closing the workplace" if they "select a union to represent them." Workers United filed an unfair labor practice charge against Starbucks on June 10, citing Schultz's comments. The charge alleges that Schultz "made an implied or actual threat to refuse to engage in good-faith bargaining," "made an implied or actual statement of futility," and "made an implied or actual threat that Starbucks will lose business because customers will go elsewhere if workers unionize." The complaint will now be investigated by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Some legal experts believe the NLRB may side with the union. “This is a textbook case,” Ann Lofaso, a former NLRB attorney, told Bloomberg. “It’s a core violation of the act when an employer suggests something could be futile.” Even if Schultz's comments don't constitute an unfair labor practice in isolation, they could be used to bolster other evidence. The NLRB "has received nearly 200 charges accusing Starbucks of violating federal labor law since the union started filing petitions for elections last August." (Starbucks, in turn, has charged the union with violating federal labor law, accusing Workers United of "intimidation and other unfair labor practices.") The NLRB has "found merit in about 50 of those cases thus far, leading to eight complaints filed against the company." The most detailed complaint against Starbucks issued by the NLRB involves stores in the Buffalo region. According to the complaint, Starbucks "promised its employees increased benefits and improved terms and conditions of employment if they refrained from union organizational activity." The complaint also alleges that Starbucks "engaged in surveillance" of employees involved in union activity, which is illegal. Further, Starbucks allegedly "has been holding mandatory or effectively mandatory captive-audience meetings for employees of its Buffalo facilities to discourage union activity." Starbucks also closed or reduced the hours of Buffalo area stores pushing to unionize. Although there can be legitimate business reasons to close stores or adjust hours, Schultz's comments could further bolster the claim that the purpose of the changes was to interfere with union activity. |
Older messages
Exposing hypocrites
Friday, June 17, 2022
Here are a few highlights from Popular Information's reporting over the last month: 1. Popular Information exposed the hypocrisy of 25 rainbow-f…
Drunk Giuliani
Tuesday, June 14, 2022
In a hearing Monday morning, the January 6 Committee laid out an extraordinary scene in the White House as the results came in on Election Night in 2020. On the one hand, many of Trump's closest
Crypto comes to Washington
Monday, June 13, 2022
Last week, Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) made a joint appearance on CNBC to discuss their bipartisan bill regulating the cryptocurrency industry. Host Andrew Ross Sorkin
The multi-trillion dollar greenwashing industry
Thursday, June 9, 2022
In the last few years, trillions of dollars have flowed into stock funds that are focused on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. These funds appeal to our better angels, using slick
Of, by, and for the billionaires
Wednesday, June 8, 2022
Two weeks after a gunman murdered 21 people at a Texas elementary school, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) announced an investigation to "protect Texans." Paxton's investigation,
You Might Also Like
TikTok, Transplant Breakthrough, and 'Baby Reindeer'
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Facts, without motives.
“Kill All Arabs”: The Feds Are Investigating UMass Amherst for Anti-Palestinian Bias
Thursday, April 25, 2024
The Department of Education is probing claims that the school discriminated against Palestinian and Arab students amid Israel's war on Gaza. Most Read Chuck Schumer Privately Warns Pakistan: Don
I'll be honest: I'm asking for your money.
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Dear reader, Most news outlets try to conceal what these emails are really about with clickbait or misleading subject lines. But I'm going to get straight to the point: I'm going to ask you to
SIROTA’S SIGNALS: Trump Could Get New Powers — With Dems’ Help
Thursday, April 25, 2024
If bipartisan legislation passes and Trump wins, he'll have new power to punish nonprofits he deems to be “terrorist supporting.” SIROTA'S SIGNALS: Trump Could Get New Powers — With Dems'
How the Supreme Court weaponizes its own calendar
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Plus: Great news about air travel, bad news about bird flu, and more. April 25, 2024 View in browser Good morning! Today, the Supreme Court will hear former President Donald Trump's suit over
Desperately Trying To Fathom The Coffeepocalypse Argument
Thursday, April 25, 2024
... ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
The largest for-profit hospital chain is putting pregnant women at risk. Shareholders are fighting back.
Thursday, April 25, 2024
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, 14 states have imposed near-total abortion bans. (Arizona may soon join them.) While all of these states include exemptions to save the life
Numlock News: April 25, 2024 • Octocorals, Pinyin, Wizards
Thursday, April 25, 2024
By Walt Hickey Digital Books Libraries pay extra when it comes to e-books that they lend out, and it can pinch them financially. For instance, Britney Spears' memoir The Woman In Me cost a library
☕ Getting the trophy (again)
Thursday, April 25, 2024
How TikTok can avoid a ban... April 25, 2024 View Online | Sign Up | Shop Morning Brew PRESENTED BY GACW Good morning. And so it begins: Cicadas are emerging in South Carolina. In Newberry County,
If Britain is so bothered by China, why do these .gov.uk sites use Chinese ad brokers? [Thu Apr 25 2024]
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Hi The Register Subscriber | Log in The Register {* Daily Headlines *} 25 April 2024 A map of the UK If Britain is so bothered by China, why do these .gov.uk sites use Chinese ad brokers? One wonders