UPDATE: A vote for paid sick leave gets fast-tracked
FACT: Only a small percentage of Popular Information's 213,000 readers are paid subscribers. One reason for this is that I've taken down the paywall. I don't believe access to information should be limited to people with disposable income. And keeping our reporting freely available maximizes its impact. But if a few more readers upgrade to paid, Popular Information can reach more people and produce more groundbreaking accountability journalism. The nation's 115,000 rail workers currently receive no paid sick leave. Major railroad companies could provide every worker with a week of paid sick leave for $321 million — less than 2% of their annual profits. Rail workers have been asking for just four days of paid sick leave. But railroad companies are offering none. So the workers are threatening to strike starting on December 9. On Monday night, fearing economic disruption, Biden called on Congress to impose a contract that has been rejected by many of the workers. That contract includes wage increases but no paid sick leave. Biden's plan, however, ran into resistance in Congress. Several House progressives tweeted their opposition to Biden's plan. Late Tuesday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House of Representatives would hold two votes. The House will first vote to impose the contract without sick leave. Then, it will hold a separate vote to add seven days of paid sick leave to the agreement. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has also called for a vote in the Senate to add paid sick leave. And he's picking up support from unexpected places. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) said he will "probably" vote to add paid sick leave to the agreement. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) called the rail workers' request for paid sick leave "reasonable." And Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) said he would not vote to impose a contract that is opposed by rail workers. But despite some tentative Republican support, the paid sick leave amendment still faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where it will likely require 60 votes to pass. Stay tuned. UPDATE: McCarthy liesCongressman Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is close to becoming the next House Speaker and the most powerful Republican in the United States. But Republicans will have a very narrow majority in the next Congress, and several pro-Trump Republicans have already announced they will not support McCarthy for Speaker. McCarthy can't afford any more defections. For a week, McCarthy remained silent about former President Donald Trump's dinner with Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist, anti-semite, and Holocaust denier. Trump dined with Fuentes and Kanye West (who formally changed his name to Ye) last Tuesday at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida. But after meeting with Joe Biden at the White House yesterday, reporters confronted McCarthy and asked if he condemned Trump's dinner with an unrepentant bigot. In response, McCarthy claimed Trump "came out four times and condemned" Fuentes. That is a lie. In a statement to Axios, Trump described Fuentes as "a guest whom I had never met and knew nothing about." In three other statements posted to Truth Social, Trump's social media platform, Trump defended the dinner and insisted he "didn't know" Fuentes. None of those statements condemned or criticized Fuentes. According to the Guardian, Trump "repeatedly refused to disavow the outspoken antisemite and white supremacist Nick Fuentes after they spoke over dinner at his Mar-a-Lago resort, rejecting the advice from advisers over fears he might alienate a section of his base." When reporters reminded McCarthy that Trump had not condemned Fuentes, McCarthy quickly switched gears. "Well, I condemn [Fuentes'] ideology," McCarthy said. "It has no place in society." McCarthy did not address whether Trump had an obligation to publicly reject Fuentes and his ideology. McCarthy made the exact same "mistake" regarding Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). Greene, who is supporting McCarthy's bid for speaker, appeared with Fuentes at his white nationalist convention in February. On Tuesday, McCarthy was asked by a reporter about members of Congress, like Greene, who had "ties" to Fuentes. "She denounced him," McCarthy quickly replied. But Greene never denounced Fuentes. Like Trump, Greene simply claimed ignorance. "I do not know Nick Fuentes," Greene said. "I’ve never heard him speak. I’ve never seen a video. I don’t know what his views are, so I’m not aligned with anything that may be controversial." In a lengthy Twitter thread featuring a video of her speech at the Fuentes event, Greene complained that "Pharisees in the Republican Party" were attacking her. She described her appearance at the white nationalist gathering as an effort "to break barriers and speak to a lost generation of young people who are desperate for love and leadership." (After McCarthy's press conference on Tuesday, nine months after her speech, Greene tweeted: "I denounce Nick Fuentes.") In February, notwithstanding Greene's excuse, McCarthy called her association with Fuentes "appalling and wrong." McCarthy added that Republicans "should not be associated any time, any place with somebody who is antisemitic." If that is still McCarthy's position, it further complicates McCarthy's efforts to defend Trump's conduct. Trump is certainly familiar with Kanye West. And, in recent weeks, West has engaged in virulently anti-semitic rhetoric, including a pledge to go "death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE." Yet after making those and many other bigoted comments, Trump invited West to dinner. But on Tuesday, McCarthy appeared to defend Trump's decision to associate with West:
McCarthy has also pledged to restore the committee membership of Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ), who addressed Fuentes' white nationalist convention as its keynote speaker. Gosar also "wrote to the FBI on his official letterhead claiming that… Fuentes had been placed on a no-fly list and protesting the alleged action." The difference between now and February is that McCarthy needs the support of Greene and Trump to achieve his political ambitions. The Wall Street Journal notes that many Republican members of the House "still strongly support the former president and might push back if Mr. McCarthy is too critical." As a result, McCarthy is excusing conduct he condemned just months ago. Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-WY), who was defeated in the Republican primary, called McCarthy out for his ruthless pursuit of power. "I know you want to be Speaker, but are you willing to be completely amoral?" Cheney said. |
Older messages
Railroading workers
Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Railroad workers across the country are threatening to go on strike on December 9, delivering a potentially crippling blow to the American economy. According to the Association of American Railroads, a
Normalizing white supremacy
Monday, November 28, 2022
Last week, Donald Trump — the former president and leading candidate for the Republican nomination in 2024 — had dinner at his Mar-a-Lago club with one of the nation's most prominent white
All corporations want for Christmas is a $131 billion tax cut
Monday, November 21, 2022
In 2017, with Trump in the White House, Republicans in Congress passed a massive tax cut for corporations, reducing the basic corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. From there, corporations have an
Trump's paymaster
Thursday, November 17, 2022
On Tuesday night, Trump announced he was running for president for the third time. The coverage of his announcement was broadly critical, focusing on the poor results of the candidates he endorsed in
Seven politicians are returning FTX's tainted money — others are keeping quiet
Wednesday, November 16, 2022
Last Friday, the crypto exchange FTX, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, abruptly declared bankruptcy after it was unable to fulfill customer requests for withdrawals. According to documents filed this week
You Might Also Like
☕ Great chains
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Prologis looks to improve supply chain operations. January 15, 2025 View Online | Sign Up Retail Brew Presented By Bloomreach It's Wednesday, and we've been walking for miles inside the Javits
Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing.
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Hegseth's hearing had some fireworks, but he looks headed toward confirmation. Pete Hegseth's confirmation hearing. Hegseth's hearing had some fireworks, but he looks headed toward
Honourable Roulette
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
The Honourable Parts // The Story Of Russian Roulette Honourable Roulette By Kaamya Sharma • 15 Jan 2025 View in browser View in browser The Honourable Parts Spencer Wright | Scope Of Work | 6th
📬 No. 62 | What I learned about newsletters in 2024
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
“I love that I get the chance to ask questions and keep learning. Here are a few big takeaways.” ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
⚡️ ‘Skeleton Crew’ Answers Its Biggest Mystery
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Plus: There's no good way to adapt any more Neil Gaiman stories. Inverse Daily The twist in this Star Wars show was, that there was no twist. Lucasfilm TV Shows 'Skeleton Crew' Finally
I Tried All The New Eye-Shadow Sticks
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
And a couple classics. The Strategist Beauty Brief January 15, 2025 Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an affiliate commission
How To Stop Worrying And Learn To Love Lynn's National IQ Estimates
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
... ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
☕ Olympic recycling
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Reusing wi-fi equipment from the Paris games. January 15, 2025 View Online | Sign Up Tech Brew It's Wednesday. After the medals are awarded and the athletes go home, what happens to all the stuff
Ozempic has entered the chat
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Plus: Hegseth's hearing, a huge religious rite, and confidence. January 15, 2025 View in browser Jolie Myers is the managing editor of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Her work often focuses on
How a major bank cheated its customers out of $2 billion, according to a new federal lawsuit
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
An explosive new lawsuit filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) alleges that Capital One bank cheated its customers out of $2 billion. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏