Tedium - A Tale of Two Tablets 📱

Today in Tedium: Let’s be honest with ourselves. As much as we’d like the products we purchase and invest in to be with us for the long haul, any product is a risk. Especially a new one, by someone untested. And when you invest in a product through a crowdfunding site, you may not necessarily know what the final result is going to look like—after all, that’s part of the “fun,” I guess. Sometimes you don’t get a device at all. Sometimes, you get that device, but then all the people that were going to support it have essentially disappeared from view. I have one of those things, I reviewed it in this newsletter, and I’d like to talk about it—but I’d also like to talk about what comes after it. Today’s Tedium looks back at the JingPad experiment, one year later, faded dreams and all—and talks to another creator with big dreams and a Linux-friendly tablet with lots of potential. — Ernie @ Tedium

Editor’s note: By the way, Tedium is now on its own Mastodon server—be sure to give us a follow to check out what we’re up to without the added influence of venture capital.

What the JingPad looked like soon after I got it out of the box. (Ernie Smith)

What happened to “The Great Linux Tablet Hope”

So, my general rule with reviews is that if something significant changes I try to do updates, if possible. With the JingPad, I decided I wanted to give myself a little more time to see how things played out. And rather than just updating the piece, I thought what happened probably deserved something closer to a retelling.

Almost exactly a year ago, I wrote a review of the JingPad in which I highlighted the good and bad of the device, which took a full month and a half to land on my doorstep when delivered directly from China.

It took a long time, but even after many delivery issues, including extended gummed-up delays in customs, it appeared, and I spent about two weeks playing with it before I wrote my full review. (I gave my first impressions over this way, in which I described the JingPad as “The Great Linux Tablet Hope.”)

And you know, it was a pretty interesting device! It had a custom-built Linux distro that was one of the few developed with tablets as a primary use case, and that operating system had already turned a few heads on x86 computers, where users found it to be an attractive way to put Linux on a Microsoft Surface, for example. (Unfortunately the x86 distro had been discontinued after the JingPad was released.)

While I highlighted its potential—seen in the form of its bright, vibrant, 2368x1728 AMOLED screen, which was arguably of better quality than the LCD screen on the iPad Pro, as well as its keyboard accessory, which used a stand that gave the device a decent typing angle—I also noted that the software was in relatively rough shape.

Part of this was as a result of some decisions with the hardware that flew against the intended open nature of the device. Most importantly, the device relies on a Unisoc Tiger T7510 system-on-a-chip, a chip that was affordable, but essentially flew in the face of the basic concept the company was trying to sell. For one thing, the Tiger T7510 had at the time of the review not seen any development on the mainline Linux kernel. Worse, the device’s 3D graphics are handled by PowerVR, a technology whose owner had somewhat infamously kept its graphics drivers proprietary, leaving them unavailable for the JingPad’s planned use case.

As I put it in the review when describing my attempts to play a YouTube video:

Despite the chipset leading to the use of an old kernel, it has other driver limitations that emerge during use, specifically when trying to play a YouTube video in either Chromium or Vivaldi; it’s dog-slow, to the point where it just seems like it’s not worth it to play a 1080p video using the interface. That’s not good news, given that this has a 2K screen, and a lot of what people would presumably be using this for is watching YouTube videos!

Spotting some critical commentary about the JingPad, I asked Samuel Dionne-Riel, a developer who works on the mobile version of NixOS, what he thought of my review after seeing a thread where he savaged JingLing for this specific decision, and he put it like this: “It is an attempt at forcing a Linux userspace to run on an Android vendor kernel tree.”

To put it another way, it is Linux being hacked together on a platform nobody uses to run raw Linux, which was probably not obvious to many buyers until they actually got the thing in their hands. Unlike other platforms like the PineBook Pro, there will not be a future where this “just works” unless a lot of kernel work is done to add support for this chipset. (Turns out, Samuel was pretty much right.)

My JingPad, as it looks currently, running Ubuntu Touch, basically the only reasonable OS choice for this device. (Ernie Smith)

But the real problems arose after the review went up on the first of December. Things seemed normal for a little bit, with the company helping its customers get up to speed. During that period, I kept a close eye on the Telegram channel to see how things were evolving. In the first couple of months of the year, the device had seen the usual excited hackers who found that they could do interesting new things with the device all the time. Some had successfully gotten Android on the platform, which makes sense because the device was being sold in mainland China with Android support; others had started messing around with Ubuntu Touch, a mobile variant of Ubuntu with a long history and generally pretty good community support provided by the nonprofit UBports.

But by the end of January, it became clear things were faltering. The primary media contact for the company—the person I worked closely with ahead of my review—had stepped down from his role.

And then came the fire sale, an attempt to sell the devices at well under the cost of the original machine. It quickly became clear what was happening—and both the JingPad and JingOS have been essentially left for dead since about March or so. This company sold a ton of people on the device, then actually offered maybe four months of real support before the money ran out.

Oh sure, there are signs of twitching. The website, while still up, has a broken security certificate. The only comments the forum gets are spam. And the once-bustling Telegram channels have turned into ghost towns.

But the most telling part is that the source code, the very thing that was supposed to keep this product alive, has laid essentially dormant, with no public activity on its GitHub page since last January. (Those that still want to get this thing to work are now hiding out on the UBports forums.)

I think the team at JingLing had good intentions, but they were trying to do something bold and interesting with Linux while taking a shortcut that ultimately left the device out in the cold.

So now, a year later, I sit with a device that has two realistic options forward. I can continue to use it as an Ubuntu Touch device, with the possibility that said operating system (which I have given positive nods to in the past) continues to see improvement, despite being stuck on a port based on the nearly seven-year-old Ubuntu 16.04; or I can run it as an Android device, stuck on an outdated non-upgradeable version of Android, and unable to support any apps that rely on Google Play services (but still plenty able to run YouTube-based video at speeds JingOS wishes it could attain). I could go back to JingOS, technically, but given its lack of development, there will only be tears over time.

That Ubuntu Touch exists for this thing at all essentially represents a life preserver for people who would otherwise be stranded. At least the screen is nice.

The Fydetab Duo. (via Indiegogo)

Can the Fydetab Duo work where the JingPad didn’t? Here’s what I learned from talking to the company’s founder

As someone who has been following the Linux hardware category for a few years, I try to keep on top of things, so with the experience with the JingPad in the back of my mind, I found the announcement of another tablet project of a similar nature a month or two ago to be really interesting.

On the surface, the Fydetab Duo seems to have a very similar pitch to the JingPad—a fledgling tablet that treats Linux like a first-class citizen and is also being sold on Indiegogo (the cheapest package is going for $585, but is likely to sell out soon, leaving only the $644 standard edition). But it has some key differences that make it worthy of a discussion in this context.

One of those comes down to the operating system it runs—it’s not straight Linux, it’s FydeOS, a variant of ChromiumOS that is targeted at both businesses and individuals and has been around long enough that one could call it fairly mature. The company got its start in 2016 in the United Kingdom, with the goal of offering a simple, clean operating system that could be sold to businesses, with an enterprise support solution offered for those interested running this software with all the enterprise bells and whistles—think management portals, real-time monitoring, configuration policies, and so on.

Alpha Tang, the cofounder and CEO of Fyde Innovations who is playing a public-facing “support guy” role on social media ahead of the Fydetab Duo’s rollout, said in an interview that his company has seen some disruptions over the years—including a move away from its original home base in the United Kingdom to focus on the Chinese market after Brexit complicated its original plan of marketing within the European Union—but for the most part FydeOS has very much kept to its original vision of being a clean, uncomplicated experience for end users.

“I would envisage Is this the future of an operating system. Google’s mission has changed over the last few years. But my vision didn’t really change that much,” he said. “It was just streamlined and simple—where you have all the computational power on the cloud, but you just have an entry point on your local device. So that’s the thing that I believe, and the primary reason that I’m still doing this after six years.”

For years, FydeOS has been just one of a small handful of forks of ChromiumOS on the market. Neverware, which for years offered a version of ChromiumOS that worked on low-power devices as well as enterprise offerings, eventually was bought by Google, which turned the former company’s work into ChromeOS Flex.

Fyde Innovations CEO Alpha Tang walks through the different features of the FydeTab Duo, including the ability to easily plug into a monitor—something the JingPad was incapable of doing.

And given that the other main company forking ChromiumOS at this point is Google, Tang’s company (with around 30 employees) has been moving to build more of an imprint for itself. That’s where the Fydetab Duo comes into play—and it plays a few key roles for Fyde Innovations. First, it’s a statement piece, it gives them a device that they can bring into enterprise sales settings that is fully produced by them, under their name—something that Tang said could make explaining their work easier to potential clients. Secondly, it allows them to potentially sell these clients an option other than “we can install FydeOS on older computers.” And finally, it gives them an opportunity to make further inroads to the enthusiast market, which has been increasingly interested in de-Googled or Linux-centric experiences.

“What we want is a demonstration that Fyde Innovations is a company that is capable of delivering on hardware products with its own OS that has been in a market for four or five years,” Tang said. “This is the message that we want to send out to our users, our clients and our prospective customers in the future.”

(Targeting the enthusiast market also, helpfully, allows them to have their own lane in the U.S. market, away from cheap-but-dominant Chromebook devices.)

Doing all this as a small software company is obviously quite the shift, but I got the impression from Tang that it was helping the firm stretch new muscles. When speaking, he made it clear that there are realistic challenges that come with managing suppliers as a smaller company—challenges that other firms, like JingLing, likely ran into.

“We have worked on our best to negotiate with a supply chain,” he said. “It’s really not built for companies our size with our ability to procure the the components of the tablet. This is the best you can do. … A company like ours would never be able to beat companies like Lenovo.”

But if Fyde can navigate that supply chain correctly, it can come out with a device that it can be proud of.