Popular Information - The right to compete
I have a slightly alarming fact to share with you. As you may know, Popular Information uses the Substack platform to publish this newsletter. Substack publishes a leaderboard of the top newsletters, across various categories, ranked by total revenue. Popular Information ranks ninth in the politics category. Not bad! But four places ahead, in fifth place, is a newsletter by Joseph Mercola. Who is Joseph Mercola? He is "the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online." Meanwhile, Popular Information's truthful reporting on the pandemic resulted in the nation's largest restaurant chain providing paid sick leave to all its employees. And this newsletter has been awarded a 100% rating by NewsGuard, an independent organization that evaluates media outlets for credibility. OK, I get it. In a list of the world's injustices, this would rate very low. But the fact is Mercola has more resources at his disposal to spread dangerous misinformation than Popular Information has to uncover the truth. You can help expand Popular Information's capacity to hold the powerful accountable by upgrading to a paid subscription. To stay completely independent, Popular Information accepts no advertising. This newsletter only exists because of the support of readers like you. In the United States, about 30 million people are subject to noncompete clauses, which "block people from working for a competing employer, or starting a competing business, after their employment ends." According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), noncompete clauses "restrict workers from moving freely" and give employers "the power to suppress wages and avoid having to compete to attract workers." Overall, the FTC estimates that noncompete clauses reduce worker earnings by $250 billion to $296 billion per year — or just under $2,000 per family. Even if you are not subject to a noncompete clause, the existence of noncompete clauses may suppress your compensation. Noncompete clauses harm all workers by preventing jobs from opening in their industry. That means the competition for the labor of all workers is reduced, driving down wages. Last week, the FTC proposed a new rule that would ban noncompete clauses in the United States. All existing noncompete clauses would be rendered null and void. And companies would be required to notify their employees that they are no longer be prohibited from pursuing employment from competitors. If the rule is adopted and upheld by the courts, it would be one of the most dramatic expansions in worker rights in decades. Noncompete clauses were initially only used for high-ranking executives with access to valuable trade secrets. But, in recent years, the use of noncompete clauses has exploded. Today, "fast-food workers, arborists and manual laborers," making little more than minimum wage, are routinely required to sign noncompete clauses as a condition of their employment. In 2021, the Wall Street Journal reported how a noncompete clause was deployed against a security guard:
Kenny did not even recall agreeing to a noncompete clause. His experience is typical. A 2011 study by an M.I.T. professor "found that employers typically presented workers with noncompete contracts when the employees lacked negotiating leverage, on their first day at work, for instance." The FTC says it has existing authority to ban noncompetes under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits "unfair methods of competition." The oppositionThe FTC's proposed rule will face stiff opposition from corporate America, which benefits from locking in valuable employees at lower wages. The Chamber of Commerce, a corporate lobbying group representing virtually every major U.S. company, issued a statement oddly claiming noncompete clauses "preserv[e] competition." The Chamber of Commerce statement also claims "noncompete agreements are an important tool in fostering innovation." But California, which has banned noncompete agreements since the 19th Century, undercuts that argument. As Matt Stoller notes in the BIG newsletter, "California’s ban on non-competes… was a key reason for Silicon Valley’s success." According to historian Margaret O’Mara, in the 1970s, "Massachusetts was wealthier, better connected and more technologically advanced." But Massachusetts had noncompete clauses which meant "the porous information ecosystem of engineers changing companies that led to lots of companies in Silicon Valley never developed." Other states that restrict noncompete clauses include: Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington. A 2011 study found that "enforcement of noncompete clauses significantly impedes entrepreneurship and employment growth." Noncompete clauses don't just prevent workers from moving to another company; they prevent workers from starting their own companies. States that limit noncompete clauses ended up with more patents, more firm starts, and more employment. Nevertheless, the Chamber of Commerce called the FTC proposal "blatantly unlawful" and, if the FTC proceeds with the rule in its current form, it is likely to be challenged in court. The Supreme Court may be sympathetic to corporations that wish to continue enforcing non-compete clauses. Specifically, the current Supreme Court has embraced the "major questions doctrine," which is the belief that "Congress must speak clearly when empowering agencies to regulate issues of vast significance." The Supreme Court invoked the previously obscure doctrine last year to "invalidate the EPA’s Clean Power Plan." FTC Chair Lina Kahn said the agency was acting well within its authority. "In addition to the text of the statute, the structure and purpose of the statute, legislative history all support the authority that we’ll be exercising," Khan said. She cited "the D.C. Circuit’s 1975 decision in National Petroleum Refiners Ass’n v. FTC, in which the court said the commission has authority to issue competition-related rules." The crackdown beginsAlong with the proposed rule, the FTC announced an enforcement action against several companies exploiting workers with noncompete clauses. The actions represent "the first time that the agency has sued to halt unlawful noncompete restrictions." One case involves a Michigan-based security firm, Prudential Security. According to the FTC, Prudential Security's standard noncompete clause prohibited employees "from working for a competing business within a 100-mile radius of their job site with Prudential for two years after leaving Prudential." While Prudential Security's "guards typically earned hourly wages at or near minimum wage," the noncompete clause "required employees to pay $100,000 as a penalty for any alleged violations of the clause." A Michigan court found that Prudential Security's noncompete clause was "unreasonable and unenforceable under state law" but the company continued "to require all of their security guard employees to sign them." The FTC's order prohibits Prudential Security "from enforcing, threatening to enforce, or imposing noncompete restrictions on any current or past workers." Further, the company is "required to notify all affected employees that they are no longer bound by noncompete restrictions." |
Key phrases
Older messages
Florida English teacher pushing book bans is openly racist and homophobic, students allege
Monday, January 9, 2023
Vicki Baggett, an English teacher at Northview High School in Florida, is pushing for the Escambia County School District to remove nearly 150 books from school libraries. In an interview last month,
"Don't Say Gay": Florida schools purge library books with LGBTQ characters
Thursday, January 5, 2023
In March 2022, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed into law the Parental Rights in Education Act, which critics dubbed the "Don't Say Gay" bill. DeSantis angrily accused the media of
The NFL's moral collapse
Wednesday, January 4, 2023
On Monday night, Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin tackled Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Tee Higgins. It seemed, at first, to be a violent but routine NFL play. Higgins hit Hamlin's chest with
$858,000,000,000
Tuesday, January 3, 2023
In 2015, the United States spent $585 billion on its military, more than the next 11 countries combined. Since then, the United States withdrew from Afghanistan, ending its longest-running war. And yet
The year in Popular Information
Monday, December 26, 2022
Accountability for right-wing billionaire Charles Koch. On March 14, 2022, Popular Information broke the news that Koch Industries, the conglomerate run by billionaire Charles Koch, was continuing
You Might Also Like
☕ I can see it now
Friday, March 29, 2024
Is video the next AI frontier? March 29, 2024 Tech Brew PRESENTED BY Infinity Fuel It's Friday. Today we've rounded up AI news from the extended Brewniverse: Tech Brew's Patrick Kulp kicks
The Police Have A Dark Money Slush Fund
Friday, March 29, 2024
Corporate interests are funneling far more money to law enforcement than previously known — often with scant oversight. Police are receiving hundreds of millions of dollars a year in secret funding
A very bad year for press freedom
Friday, March 29, 2024
Plus: Beyoncé's new album, Netanyahu's new crisis, and more. March 29, 2024 View in browser Good morning! I'm back, here to dig into a topic close to my heart. —Caroline Houck, senior
Numlock News: March 29, 2024 • Trading Cards, Kite Fights, Breadfruit
Friday, March 29, 2024
By Walt Hickey Have a great weekend! Kite Fighting A popular competitive sport in Brazil is kite fighting, where competitors try to cut down their opponents kites while avoiding getting their own kite
☕️ Floppy-haired fraudster
Friday, March 29, 2024
SBF is sentenced to 25 years... March 29, 2024 View Online | Sign Up | Shop Morning Brew PRESENTED BY Impact.com Good morning. Today marks one year since Evan Gershkovich, a 32-year-old American Wall
AI hallucinates software packages and devs download them – even if potentially poisoned with malware [Fri Mar 29 2024]
Friday, March 29, 2024
Hi The Register Subscriber | Log in The Register {* Daily Headlines *} 29 March 2024 Illustration of someone in a hoodie looking at a bench with a cloud over it AI hallucinates software packages and
What A Day: Clown by law
Friday, March 29, 2024
Trump's lawyers are having another rough one. And the mainstream media could learn a lesson from the legal world about handling corruption. Thursday, March 28, 2024 BY CROOKED MEDIA —Steve Bannon,
🌶️ Is it getting hot in here?
Friday, March 29, 2024
Introducing our theme for April plus fun stuff to read, watch, and click on. March 28, 2024 Open in new tab Did a friend forward this? Subscribe today! April's Theme is SPICY It was chosen by our
What 58 Famous People Smell Like
Friday, March 29, 2024
Here's what you missed on the Strategist. The Strategist Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an affiliate commission. What
Trump Would Need New Tactics to Steal the 2024 Election
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Columns and commentary on news, politics, business, and technology from the Intelligencer team. Intelligencer early and often Trump Would Need New Tactics to Steal the 2024 Election Many avenues Trump