The Deleted Scenes - Can It Be?
I saw a thread on Twitter recently, from (I think) a conservative/libertarian, which began with this:
Her thread ends with this:
Frankly, I’ve been in new construction where 50 years would be optimistic. And I’ve also seen very nice, sturdy new buildings. It all depends. But this makes me think of a lot of things. To some extent, it’s a fantasy; most people will never literally build their own house. But the point—that regulation is too thick, and that it benefits big developers—is basically correct. I wrote about that here, arguing that we need more small developers; the ones who will restore a little Main Street building, not buy a whole block and put up a 10-year project in three phases. People are wary of lessening regulation because of the perception that it’s a handout to these big companies. But it’s the smaller companies that benefit the most from that reduced burden. Those tweets make me think of other things. One is this blog post from urbanist writer Johnny Sanphillippo, titled “Grandpa’s Basement House.” It’s really fascinating, and has great accompanying photos, but this is the key bit:
It also reminds me of something I wrote about the history of fast food, back when I reviewed Adam Chandler’s Drive-Thru Dreams. This was my takeaway from the story of KFC founder Harland Sanders:
And I also think of a dinner my wife and I had in Croatia last year. It was in a woman’s home; she served only about four guests a night, with a prix fixe menu, about half of which was relatively easy to make. (I also wrote about that, with pictures!) What really struck me was that this woman was basically doing a dinner party for money. She didn’t have to choose between entertaining friends and opening a “real” restaurant, which is one of the toughest businesses out there. She was able to dial up her passion a little bit more, make a little bit of money, and have very little of the pressure that restaurant owners face. So that brings me back to that initial tweet. Maybe construction isn’t the first thing we should open up to the everyman. But there really is very little you can just up and do in America. I wonder what it does to the character of a people to know that. I wonder how much human cost is downstream of such impersonal things as red tape, bureaucracy, applications, public input hearings. I wonder how many dreams we artificially foreclose. How many bored, frustrated, stifled people could be discovering and monetizing a hobby or passion, in an alternate world where that was allowed. Years ago, when I was a college intern at the now-defunct Worldwatch Institute in Washington, D.C., I attended their big annual book-launch conference. They were a pretty left-leaning environmentalist outfit born in the 1970s, but some of their material was very sensible to me. One speech in particular stood out to me at that conference. The speaker (I don’t recall who he was), went through these libertarian-ish arguments about just letting people do things, devolving the scale at which things are done, cutting regulation, etc. And he basically said, there’s nothing wrong with it; the better way to think about why we don’t operate like this anymore is that it’s obsolete. Rich, developed societies simply evolve towards stability and security over bustling entrepreneurship. It isn’t a choice, per se, or a political ideology; it’s an epiphenomenon of our level of economic development. I’ve always kind of thought that was right. Or, more precisely, explanatory. It does seem as though rich societies develop the idea that they can pay for stability. Strong Towns has done a lot of work on these ideas: Charles Marohn calls these two approaches “chaotic but smart” and “orderly but dumb.” He basically advocates for returning to the old approach to development and commerce, of not doing what our modern wealth gives us a feeling that we’re entitled to do. We haven’t “earned” suburbia or car dependence, Marohn argues; we pay for them by stealing from the future. It’s a mirage. But are “chaotic but smart” and “orderly but dumb” actually “approaches”? Or are they much more complex/contingent/emergent things? Think about the primary places/communities where people still build their own homes and have a very small-scale, distributed approach to commerce. The Amish. Who basically froze their level of development at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution. The Amish seem to grok, more perceptively than the rest of us, that embracing modern technology is a sort of letting the cat out of the bag. The only way to win is not to play. The other places you see hints of this old order are immigrant communities. Why? Not “because they’re immigrants.” Because they’ve simply not let go of something we have let go of. We still do it, sort of, with farmer’s markets, street festivals, things like that. But they retain their artsy-fartsy, hoity-toity reputation. That’s how you really know something has changed; when the commercial habits of the vast majority of humans who have ever lived become coded as elitist. What’s the upshot of all this? I guess this is a much longer piece asking the same question I’ve asked a few times recently: whether whatever it is that “urbanism” is or was is actually recoverable to us today? I wouldn’t be writing this if I didn’t at least hope so. Related Reading: Not-Pennsylvania Amish Country Thank you for reading! Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to help support this newsletter. You’ll get a weekly subscribers-only post, plus full access to the archive: over 600 posts and growing. And you’ll help ensure more material like this! You're currently a free subscriber to The Deleted Scenes. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |
Key phrases
Older messages
Step One
Wednesday, May 17, 2023
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #110
The Oxford Incident
Tuesday, May 16, 2023
Understanding is not agreeing, and explaining is not excusing
Murder Underground
Monday, May 15, 2023
Crime, homelessness, and bad ideas
You Don't Have Enough Unless You Have More Than Enough
Saturday, May 13, 2023
Thoughts on risk assessment, insurance, efficiency vs. resilience
New and Old #109
Friday, May 12, 2023
Friday roundup and commentary
You Might Also Like
The Chic Flat Shoe Everyone Is Wearing Right Now
Thursday, May 9, 2024
See ya later, boots.
the dissonance intensifies
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
are we in a dystopian YA novel or something? ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
The Only Two Times You Can Effectively Multitask
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Are Trump Fans Really Wearing Diapers? Multitasking decreases the quality of your output. However, if you feel you have no choice, these are the best times to try to make it work. Not displaying
Sydney Sweeney's Spicy LBD Has Massive Hip Cut-Outs
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Plus, your horoscope for Wednesday, May 8.
Are Student Protestors Graduating or Not?
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
What's new today on the Cut — covering style, self, culture, and power, plus interviews, profiles, columns, and commentary from our editors. Brand Logo WEDNESDAY, MAY 8 power Am I Graduating or Not
Is homemade seafood stock worth it?
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
This meatless burger restaurant is ready to takeover NYC
Brooke Shields Is Funny, Damn It
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Welcome to TZR's Summer Fashion Issue.
"And as we forgot the dark, we forgot even the rain"
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
May 8, 2024 asian / pacific american heritage month “My Father's Accent” by Kaveh Akbar “Even the Rain” by Agha Shahid Ali “Ode to Anger” by Marilyn Chin “Seawall soliloquy number two: she built a
WIN prizes to upgrade your backyard from the Southern Living Plant & Home Collection!
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Bless This Backyard Sweepstakes
A Long Climb
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #161 ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏