I Like Accredited Investor Laws. Here's Why.
I’ve been in tech for almost 10 years. During that whole time, the idea of getting rid of accredited investor laws so anyone can invest in startups has been a hot topic and commonly debated in the realm of democratizing venture capital. Note, historically these laws prohibited anyone from investing in startups unless they were rich. See the below image for the qualifications, coming straight from the SEC. The issue with this is how can the working class get the upside of the next Uber if 99% of people can’t even legally invest in startups? The idea is that the system is stacked against the common-folk, and only allows the rich to invest in these assets that create massive wealth. The rich get richer, the poor stay the same, or so it seems in this context. I think on a high level, this makes sense. Startups are a way plenty of people have created a massive amount of wealth, so it seems unfair to block off regular people from being exposed to this asset class. The main argument for having these laws is mainly to protect investors from being scammed by bad actors in the system. For every one Uber, there is literally 1M Shmoobers. I could write a whole post on that, but for sake of good faith, let’s assume people reading this only plan on working with good actors w/ solid ethics. Even in that case, these laws have a purpose and should not be removed. Personally, I Like The Laws. Here’s Three Reasons WhyPeople overestimate their future ability to grow wealth via startupsSure, everyone thinks they know the startup that will blow up but it’s a lot more than just picking to win in this game. It’s picking, it’s access, and it’s ownership. In order to invest in startups, you need to be able to pick the ones you think will massively appreciate in value. Then once you pick, those founders need to be open and willing to give you a spot on their cap table. If you’re writing a very small check, this may be a tall order for a founder and potentially even a nuisance. Lastly, you need to have enough ownership in the startup to not be diluted into oblivion through several rounds of funding. What’s to stop the series A or B firm from wiping you out if the startup is successful down the line? Nothing. You won’t have much negotiation leverage either. This is an issue for investors who cut checks as large as $100k, so something in the low thousands could lead to an issue where your ownership slips to nearly 0%. Is there a world where you can pick a great startup, get access to invest, invest at a valuation that gives you decent ownership, and pray that future investors play nice? Yes! It’s just far less likely than the average retail investor who wants to get into startups wants to admit. You Actually Don’t Need To Be Rich To be Accredited AnymoreThis is new, but as of a couple of years ago, there are more ways to become an accredited investor without needing to have $1M in assets or make $200k in salary for 2 years in a row. The most important change is the idea that you can take a test and if you pass, you become accredited. If you pass the Series 7, 65, or 82, and are in good standing with FINRA, you are accredited. This is great! Anyone can study up and take these tests. Most importantly, there isn’t a minimal wealth level tied to taking it. I like this because it makes being accredited attainable for anyone. And anyone with high agency can just study, take it, get the deed done, and start cutting checks. With the introduction of this new iteration of what makes someone accredited, it makes it easier to spot the people who are just being a little lazy. If you really wanted be accredited, you would just study and take the test. So by simply not acknowledging that the step is there and demanding the step be removed to reduce all friction, it could communicate to the SEC (and to founders) that you shouldn’t be accredited in the first place. You Can Get Ownership Via Advisory SharesIf you’re in a position where you want to invest in startups and get that upside but are not accredited, consider working for startups in exchange for equity. This is a great way to build up your reputation and develop your access points to when you are in a position to start investing. Getting advisory shares also allows you to build your own skillset so you can be a better investor in the future for your portfolio companies. Startup land is a very opaque industry, so spending your time at a few can really amplify your learning and spike your growth curve in making it in this industry. That’s it for me. I am all for democratizing VC. I have written nearly a dozen posts about it. I just don’t think that removing the accredited investor laws are the move. I think it’s harder to make money in startups than people think, its easier to become accredited without wealth, and there’s potentially more appropriate ways to cut your teeth in startups while still getting upside, like advising. I hope you find this post helpful for your own framing. Thanks for reading. |
Key phrases
Older messages
Technological Progress ≠ Societal Progress
Sunday, May 7, 2023
Why I am not super excited about AI
Social Capital Markets Are Begging For Nuance
Friday, May 5, 2023
Mildly contextual introductions are just what the doctor ordered
Seedscout For YC Startups
Friday, April 7, 2023
All Y Combinator startups get 75% off of Seedscout
Access Over Education
Saturday, March 18, 2023
Education is a scapegoat for society's woes
LTSE Equity is Launching On Product Hunt!
Thursday, March 9, 2023
Introducing a tool for building a long term oriented company
You Might Also Like
The crypto con scamming founders
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Plus: London's 'founder house' and Europe's most data-driven VCs View in browser Up!rotterdam logo flagship Good morning there, Being a new founder can be tough. You might not have a
BeautifulSouls.ai, WSTR, AdGPT.com, Buzzhref.io, and iListen
Monday, May 6, 2024
Summarize any article or webpage into a short podcast BetaList BetaList Daily BeautifulSouls.ai Get the spiritual guidance you need, quick and affordable AdGPT.com The world's first fully automated
🦄 AI-powered proactive care
Monday, May 6, 2024
Lilli is building AI-powered monitoring of those in need.
💃 If she can do it, you can too
Monday, May 6, 2024
Meet this mom Hey , Every day, we hear stories of individuals who had dreamed of a different life—a life where they call the shots, balance family time with personal success, and make a real impact…who
Week of May 6, 2024 - 12 Silicon Valley Startups Raised $461M. Island Raised $175M Series D led by Coatue and Sequ…
Monday, May 6, 2024
Week of May 6, 2024 - 12 Silicon Valley Startups Raised $461M. 🔥 Burn Book by Kara Swisher. 🤓 How to Pick the Right Series A Investors. 👓 Meta is Quietly Winning the AI Wearable Race. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
📂 Anchor pricing on a primary value metric
Monday, May 6, 2024
Today's newsletter is proudly supported by MarketerHire 🎉 I see more and more top-tier marketing talent going freelance these days. And as a 4x first marketing hire myself, I know just how
How to fend off a US competitor
Monday, May 6, 2024
Plus: Mushroom tech's many strands and Bolt's new debt funding View in browser Logo - Zoom_flagship (1) Good morning there, Spring is in full swing in Europe. The trees and plants are popping —
#178 | Real Estate Rush, Manufacturing AI, & more
Sunday, May 5, 2024
April 29–May 5th | Insights from FirstMark, Bessemer, Craft Ventures, and others ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
⭐ These are YC's Top Companies
Sunday, May 5, 2024
Plus: Design Review is back with a new episode! This Week at YC May 5th, 2024 As Garry writes: revenue is the clearest indicator of a startup's success. With that in mind, we've just updated
what do you want?
Sunday, May 5, 2024
update your content preferences. we'll send you the intel you want. Hi there, Have it your way. Tell us the insights you want, and the insights you don't. We'll update your content