Your guide to the nonsense about Trump's federal indictment
Elon Musk is restricting links to Substack, the service I use to publish Popular Information, on Twitter. It's a direct attack on independent journalism. I spoke to the Washington Post about Musk's arbitrary and vindictive decision-making. This is a problem for Popular Information. Since our founding in 2018, about half of our subscribers have found out about this newsletter through Twitter. Unfortunately, Twitter is now hostile territory for Popular Information. After I documented how the Community Notes feature is being weaponized against Popular Information's accurate reporting Musk tweeted to his 130 million followers that I am a "tool." Popular Information can adapt to this new reality and continue to thrive, but we need your help. We have 263,000 readers, but only a small percentage are paid subscribers. If a few more readers upgrade to paid, Popular Information can invest in alternative growth strategies and produce more accountability journalism that rattles the cages of the rich and powerful. Today, for the first time in American history, a former president of the United States will appear at a federal courthouse to be arraigned on criminal charges. The indictment against Trump alleges that he took hundreds of classified documents from the White House to his social club in Florida, where he stored them in cardboard boxes along with newspaper clippings and other miscellanea. The boxes containing classified materials ended up in storage closets, ballrooms, and bathrooms without meaningful security measures — all while thousands of people visited the club. The charges against Trump, made public by Special Counsel Jack Smith last week, related not only to Trump's retention of the nation's national security secrets, but also his efforts to conceal the materials from law enforcement. The indictment is devastatingly detailed, incorporating audio recordings, photographs, text messages, and contemporaneous notes. All told, Trump faces 37 charges related to violations of the Espionage Act, obstruction, and conspiracy. Nevertheless, millions of people are convinced that Trump is being railroaded. This includes supporters "planning mass protests" at the Miami courthouse today and promising to arrive "well armed." But it also includes an assortment of TV pundits, op-ed writers, and elected officials. Some of the arguments sound persuasive at first blush. But a closer examination reveals that none of them hold water. Argument 1: Hillary Clinton did the same thingThe Wall Street Journal editorial board called the indictment against Trump "destructive." The editorial argues that Hillary Clinton engaged in the same conduct when she used a private email server as Secretary of State. According to the editorial, then-FBI Director James Comey looked into the matter and found that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” It was wrong for Clinton to use a private email server to conduct official business as a member of the Obama administration. The communications of the Secretary of State, whether or not they involve classified information, is of interest to foreign adversaries. And a private server does not have adequate security. More broadly, like printed materials, communications produced as a public official belong to the public. And they should be stored and retained for the benefit of the public. Very few documents marked with any level of classification were found on Clinton's email server. Nevertheless, the FBI did find numerous emails that discussed classified national security information and, therefore, should have been considered classified. But there are enormous differences between Clinton's conduct and the alleged conduct of Trump. Specifically, the relevant section of the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. §793(e)) requires the mishandling of national security information to be "willful." On July 9, 2016, Comey explained why charges were not appropriate in Clinton's case (emphasis added):
The indictment against Trump includes evidence that the mishandling of classified information was intentional and willful. Specifically, in July 2021, there is an audio recording of Trump showing four individuals without any security clearance a classified "plan of attack" produced for him by the Department of Defense. Trump describes the document as "highly confidential." He showed the group the document anyway, even though he acknowledges he did not "declassify" the document as president and it remained "secret." There were similar incidents, not recorded on audio, in August and September 2021. Further, according to the indictment, after a "grand jury issued a subpoena requiring Trump to turn over all documents with classification markings," Trump "endeavored to obstruct the FBI and grand jury investigations and conceal his continued retention of classified documents." Trump's effort included: 1. Suggesting his attorney lie to the FBI, 2. Directing his personal assistant to move boxes containing classified documents to hide them from Trump's own attorney and the FBI, and 3. Suggesting his attorney hide or destroy documents. In contrast, when the FBI requested work-related emails from Clinton's personal server, Clinton, through her attorneys, produced them. Trump frequently cites the 30,000 emails Clinton's attorneys determined were not work-related and later deleted. But Clinton's work-related emails were sent to other people in the government. And the FBI also reviewed "the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond." The FBI found no evidence that any "work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them." In other words, had Trump simply turned over the documents when asked, he would almost certainly not be facing charges. Argument 2: Joe Biden did the same thingThe Wall Street Journal editorial board also complained that "Biden had old classified files stored in his Delaware garage next to his sports car." Biden's retention of classified documents is under investigation by another special counsel, Robert Hur, appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland. But, like Clinton, Biden is unlikely to be charged because he has been cooperative. The investigation began not because of any request but because Biden voluntarily reported that classified documents were found at Biden's University of Pennsylvania office. A similar investigation into former Vice President Mike Pence, who improperly retained a few classified documents after leaving office, has already been closed without any charges. Argument 3: Bill Clinton's sock drawer exonerates TrumpA New York Post op-ed by Jonathan Turley suggests that Trump's best defense might be Bill Clinton's sock drawer. Bill Clinton's dresser was the subject of "a 13-year-old case in which the right-leaning nonprofit Judicial Watch sought access to 79 audio tape recordings of Clinton interviews conducted by the historian Taylor Branch while Clinton was in office." Clinton "designated the recordings as personal records, not official presidential records, that were therefore not required to be turned over to the National Archives and Records Administration under the Presidential Records Act." The case was dismissed, however, because the court found that it could not order Clinton to turn over materials to the National Archives. The line frequently cited by right-wing media is: "[T]he [Presidential Records Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretionary authority on the Archivist to classify records. Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President." But the case against Trump does not involve a determination of whether it is a personal record that he can retain or a presidential record that should be in possession of the Archivist. Under the Espionage Act, the issue is Trump shared national defense information with unauthorized persons and failed to return the documents containing the information to government officials. Argument 4: It's a dangerous precedent"And what about the precedent?" The Wall Street Journal editorial board asks. "If Republicans win next year’s election, and especially if Mr. Trump does, his supporters will demand that the Biden family be next. Even if Mr. Biden is re-elected, political memories are long." Biden is already facing a special counsel investigation of his handling of classified materials, and the Justice Department is already investigating Biden's son, Hunter Biden. Further, either decision made by special counsel Jack Smith would set a precedent. Declining to prosecute, even after uncovering substantial evidence that Trump committed crimes, would set the precedent that a former president is exempt from federal criminal laws after leaving office, including the laws in place to protect national defense information. Prosecuting Trump sets the precedent that former presidents can be prosecuted after leaving office. Which is the more dangerous precedent? |
Key phrases
Older messages
The Saudis buy professional golf
Monday, June 12, 2023
For years, the PGA Tour has clearly stated that LIV — the upstart golf tour backed by the Saudi government — was little more than an extravagantly financed effort to paper over egregious Saudi human
You get what you pay for
Monday, June 12, 2023
A new report from Brown University's Watson Institute of International and Public Affairs, shared exclusively with Popular Information, reveals how decades of enormous military spending have
Fox News' favorite Democratic presidential candidate
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Fox News does not usually feature laudatory coverage of Democratic political candidates. There is an exception: Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who announced in April he was running for president in the
These 25 major corporations donated $13.5 million to anti-gay politicians since 2022
Monday, June 5, 2023
In 2023, conservative activists have advanced the theory that major corporations are pushing a radical, pro-LGBTQ agenda onto the country. For example, Anheuser-Busch sent trans influencer Dylan
UPDATE: Inside the disturbing investigation of Mika Westwolf's death
Thursday, June 1, 2023
In the early hours of March 31, Mika Westwolf, a 22-year-old Indigenous woman, was fatally struck by a Cadillac Escalade while walking on the shoulder of US Highway 93 in Montana. The driver of the
You Might Also Like
✅ Cheat codes for life
Friday, May 3, 2024
Fun stuff to click on, watch, and read from CreativeMornings HQ. May 2, 2024 Open in new tab Did a friend forward this? Subscribe today. Speech bubble logo with the words, CreativeMornings "Never
The hateful bait
Thursday, May 2, 2024
President Biden urged protestors to stay peaceful, as demonstrations and arrests continued to roil campuses around the country. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
The House Antisemitism Bill Is Bad for the Jews and Free Speech
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Columns and commentary on news, politics, business, and technology from the Intelligencer team. Intelligencer the national interest The House Antisemitism Bill Is Bad for the Jews And free speech. UCLA
A whisper-thin pair of underwear
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Currently on sale ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Friday Briefing: Hamas considers Israel’s proposal
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Also, the US accused Russia of using chemical weapons. View in browser|nytimes.com Ad Morning Briefing: Asia Pacific Edition May 3, 2024 Author Headshot By Amelia Nierenberg Good morning. We're
Hear from AWS experts on all things cloud security in the generative AI era
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Navigate security for generative AI, automated reasoning, cryptography, & more at AWS re:Inforce GeekWire is pleased to present this special sponsored message to our Pacific NW readers. Hear from
That's Not How They Roll
Thursday, May 2, 2024
The Jivebiscuit Skate Family Reunion and other news... ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Docker, Qualtrics leaders join Seattle startup | DoorDash rips Seattle over minimum wage law
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Microsoft exec joins Mariners ownership group | Meet the latest Creative Destruction Lab grads ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Washington state's second-largest city is the hub of an
Give Her an Actually Useful Bag
Thursday, May 2, 2024
A carry-all bag for Mom from Away. The Strategist Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an affiliate commission. An Everywhere
SIROTA’S SIGNALS: We’ll Have To Wait Until 2065 — Unless This Changes
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Plus, Boeing drops incriminating evidence on an attorney, gambling takes over old-fashioned arcade games, and that time Nixon almost fought climate change. SIROTA'S SIGNALS: We'll Have To Wait