Tedium - An Innovative Lapel Pin? 🧷

Today in Tedium: It only took us 15 years, but we have finally figured out how to install the brains of a computer into the heart of a lapel pin. Recently, the startup Humane, founded by a pair of Apple design alums not named Jony Ive, announced the AI Pin, a device that is intended to fully replace a smartphone with a set of gestures, a tiny laser projector, and the vocal processing power of artificial intelligence. It makes for great demo, as the clip on their website suggests, but it’s to be seen how it will go over in the real world. But it has me thinking—hey, lapel pins don’t really come up in the same sentence as “innovative” all that often. Is now a good time to talk about lapel pins in today’s Tedium? I say so. May you never forget yours. — Ernie @ Tedium

Examples of znachki dating to the 1970s. (Michael Neubert/Flickr)

In Soviet Russia, kids once collected lapel pins like baseball cards

We’re nearly two years into a deadly war in Ukraine initiated by the Russian government, which makes it a weird time to talk about anything novel from a Soviet Union history standpoint, but the truth of the matter is, we cannot talk about lapel pins without talking about the Soviet Union’s historic obsession with them; it’s one of the most interesting things about lapel pins. (With that in mind, I want to make clear that, in the spirit of writing about settled things, I separate vintage cultural artifact from modern global conflict.)

That obsession with lapel pins dates at least to the 19th century, when such pins were given as a reward to workers, but in the 20th century, they became out-and-out collectibles. In the 1960s, at a time when baseball cards were just starting to become a popular collectible among American children, Russian children embraced “znachki” with a similar fervor.

In many ways, lapel pins were actually bigger in Russia than baseball cards were in the U.S. Back in the day, people collected these things like Pogs, or like stickers on the back of their laptops. And it considering the trend from the outside in generally felt a little weird.

The news of the prominence of this trend hit American shores in 1974, in a widely syndicated New York Times article. (Which we’re linking via a newspaper archive because we avoid linking NYT when we can.) In the article, it’s noted that the lapel pin fad tended to favor rarity or exoticness, just like baseball cards.

“When foreign sports teams come to Moscow, they are besieged by znachki hunters looking for a rare foreign lapel pin,” the piece noted.

The Times wasn’t the only organization to spot the trend. A 1975 document titled “A Report by the US Historic Preservation Team of the US-USSR Joint Working Group on the Enhancement of the Urban Environment,” essentially tracking historic preservation efforts in the Soviet Union at a time when relations between the U.S. and Soviet Union were beginning to thaw, noted that sellers of these lapel pins were downright common.

In one passage:

It was also in Suzdal that we were introduced to two tourist-related activities managed in large part by the private sector in Soviet preservation. These were the manufacture and sale of regional crafts and lapel pins. Everywhere we went in the Soviet Union we were presented with handsomely designed lapel pins which often featured local architectural monuments. Large trays of such lapel pins were displayed in Suzdal kiosks. We were to amass diverse personal collections during the course of our stay. A reconstructed wooden house served as a sales outlet for native handicraft, featuring decorated woodware, the famed Russian palekh, or lacquered papier mache chests, and assorted jewelry. The sale of lapel pins and handicrafts, we were to learn later, represents a source of revenue for the societies for the preservation of cultural monuments.

This popularity actually proved something of a problem. The Times piece noted that all the metal being used in znachki production had put pressure on manufacturing infrastructure, leading to a scolding from Pravda.

“If strict controls are not imposed over the issuance of this product, then the damage will be ever-increasing,” the Times’ translation states. “So let pioneer Vasya (a mythical boy collector) go collect barnyard locks. It will be much cheaper for the state.”

But Pravda nudging Russian children away from collecting pins could only do so much—and it even created something of an interesting cultural dichotomy.

Later on, as the Cold War began to give way to Russian democracy, commentators noted an unusual trend: The extreme popularity of American znachki over the Russian kind. Tom Kelly, an editorial writer for the South Florida Sun Sentinel who had visited the Soviet Union in the late ’80s, recalled that he was able to get a whole bunch of Lenin pins in exchange for his single American flag pin:

Nothing could be more American than the flag, I thought, so I affixed one of the embarrassingly tacky little pins to my jacket and filled my pockets with the rest the first time I ventured out on the streets of Moscow in 1988.

What happened next was a revelation. If the U.S. Supreme Court needs any further convincing of the potent symbolism of the Stars and Stripes, I suggest it try trading pins in Russia.

A crowd of kids surrounded me as soon as they saw the flag. They jostled each other to display the pins they wanted to exchange, all of them much more impressive than my humble flag.

I finally settled on a half-dollar-sized head of Lenin as the prize I wanted and extracted a flag from my pocket for the lucky trader. Disappointed at first, the others suddenly realized I had more than one flag, so they pressed even closer dis-playing their wares. The bidding quickly escalated to two or three Soviet pins for each flag.

Lady Izdihar, a Russian historian, talks about her collection of lapel pins and how she stores them.

These days, Soviet pins remain a hot commodity, at least among fans of Soviet culture, and still periodically show up in the West in eBay form. As noted in Atlas Obscura in 2020, znachki is no longer the big mainstream trend it once was in Russia. But it does reflect a kitsch symbolism that some still gravitate towards.

We need more politicians repping the Triforce. (Danny Kim/Unsplash)

That tiny mechanical pin holder you use for your lapel pins has a nickname. It’s “Dammit.” Really.

You have most assuredly run into the clip that often appears on the back of many pins. It’s a small piece of metal with two tiny flaps on either side, a mechanical device that tightens around a pin when you need it to stay, but loosens up the second you put a little pressure on those clips.

This thing has a name—a couple, really. Its best-known modern name is a butterfly clutch, so named after the motion the clip makes when you open it up, which looks vaguely like a butterfly.

If you go back a little further, though, you’ll find that it sometimes gets referred to under another name, a Ballou clutch, named for one of its inventors, Frederick A. Ballou Jr., who ran a jewelry manufacturer, B.A. Ballou & Company.

Of all the years to file a patent for an innovative pin clutch, you could do a lot worse than 1942. (Google Patents)

In a 1942 patent filing, granted the next year, Ballou and his partner Melvin W. Moore discussed a device that stayed sturdy, but didn’t damage clothing:

One or the objects of this invention is to provide a securing device of this character which will serve as a guard for the end of the shank or stud which it grips to prevent contact with the pointed end of the shank which might cause abrasion either to the hand of the user or to the fabric of clothing with which it might come in contact.

Another object of the invention is to limit the insertion of the shank element into the securing device while at the same time securely holding and gripping the shank to prevent removal of the shank such as through the clothing which it pierces in order to hold a button in position.

Another object of the invention is to provide an effective guard for the shank which is to be gripped while at the same time leaving the clutch operating arms accessible for manual manipulation it is desired to remove the securing device from the shank.

And as I’m sure you noticed by the timing of this invention, it came for the perfect time to be closely associated with World War II, and that’s how I found more information about it.

Dr. Howard G. Lanham, who developed a Tripod website on military patches and insignia, has a page on his site discussing the different methods used to pin insignia to clothing. Often, these tools required screw posts, or used a different design from the Ballou design, which found wide use during World War II.

An example of the Ballou clutch, also known as the butterfly clutch. Yes, someone invented this!

“It seems that wing badge collectors in particular are fond of reminding others that clutch fasteners existed prior to the Second World War,” Lanham wrote. “They are correct about that. However, the truth is that prior to World War II clutch fasteners were not used on any kind of government-issued, enlisted insignia and were found on a minority of other kinds of privately purchased insignia, mostly worn by officers. The vast majority of pre-World War Two insignia still were pin-back or screw back in construction.”

Two other pin-clutching designs, which did not look anything like the much more common Ballou design, existed before it, but we ultimately see the Ballou pin clutch most commonly today.

However, there has been room for innovation since then, and more recently, it’s been common to see magnetic backs, which have the nice benefit of not requiring you to pierce your clothing at all just to get your lapel pin to stick. (It does come with a downside, however: If you have a pacemaker, you’re not supposed to put magnets near it—which means that magnetic backs are out.)

Pin holders are a total pain to lose, which explains why they are sometimes called DAMMITs, a brand name used by the company Quik-Pin for its pin retainers, which aren’t made of brass like the Ballou clips are.