Hi y’all —
In journalism school, I was always taught to eliminate adjectives and adverbs from my copy. The idea was that, as a writer, I should know how to make the most of every word I use; I should strive to show, not tell.
My professors drilled this rule into me, often using famous quotes attributed to Mark Twain — “When you catch an adjective, kill it” — and Stephen King — “The road to hell is paved with adverbs” — to justify their stance.
Imagine my skepticism, then, when I saw financial experts talking about the quote-unquote “great wealth transfer.” How great, I wondered, could it possibly be? Do they mean “great” as in “big” or “great” as in “good”? Is it even something I need to care about?
Let’s find out whether that adjective is warranted. What is the great wealth transfer, and what does it mean for me?
Chayce Horton, a senior analyst at Cerulli Associates, says the “great wealth transfer” refers to the ongoing transfer of money from baby boomers to Gen X, millennial and Gen Z households.
“Coming out of the financial crisis, we've seen an immense amount of wealth be created, and U.S. households are wealthier than ever,” he says. “There's tens of trillions, almost hundreds of trillions, of dollars floating around, and a majority of that is controlled by households that are over 65 years old.”
But that’s about to change. According to a report from Cerulli, over $84 trillion — with a T — will switch hands through 2045. Nearly $12 trillion of that will go to charity, while the rest will be transferred directly to heirs.
“It's the most significant transfer of wealth intergenerationally that we've ever seen in the world,” Horton adds.
The great wealth transfer comes with a host of societal implications. First, of course, is the fact that a whole bunch of young people are on track to come into a whole bunch of money — “a seismic change,” as one expert put it in a recent Knight Frank report.
Those young people have very different ideals than their ancestors did; notably, they’re incredibly focused on sustainability and social responsibility. As a result, they are “likely to direct significant amounts of capital to causes beyond solely maximizing economic growth,” per the report. That's yet another major reversal from what we’re used to.