Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times

Is Vice President Kamala Harris a “human rights hawk,” who would use American power to promote democracy and freedom abroad? Or is she a “pragmatic internationalist” who would back gingerly away from American hegemony?

Is she poised to end an era of American hubris and restore humility to our foreign policy? Or does her forceful rhetoric on America’s role in the world reveal an “inner Reagan”?

Two months out from the presidential election, there’s rampant speculation about what a “Harris doctrine” for foreign policy could look like, but it often seems to reveal more about what the person doing the speculating wants (or doesn’t want) in the next president than any particular worldview articulated by Harris. 

It’s not that the vice president doesn’t have a track record to examine. While some coverage has portrayed her as something of a foreign-policy neophyte, she would come into office with more global experience than Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, or Donald Trump had.  

As vice president, she has met with dozens of world leaders, represented the US at global gatherings, and attended the president’s daily intelligence briefings. In her Democratic National Convention address, she touted the fact that she had been the one to brief Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on US intelligence about the looming Russian invasion in Munich just days before it occurred in 2022. 

The administration has also noted her role in the recent prisoner swap with Russia. She also was involved in US efforts to strengthen alliances in Southeast Asia, particularly with the Philippines. And though she was not the “border czar” she’s sometimes portrayed as in attack ads, she did lead the administration's efforts to address the “root causes” of migration through aid to Central America. 

What’s harder to pin down is how she might differ from the Biden administration, which is what all the “Harris doctrine” speculation is trying to pin down. When it comes to that, the analysis often comes down to — to use the buzzword of the moment — vibes. 

In a recent Time feature on Harris’s record on Ukraine, Ukrainian officials acknowledged she had been engaged on the issue and showed sympathy for the country’s plight, but one official described it as feeling like “formal sympathy, following protocol.”

In a recent episode of The Ezra Klein Show podcast, the host speculated that as the child of immigrants with a more global perspective, Harris “does not have that identification” with Israel that Americans of Joe Biden’s generation do.

But that’s not quite how Harris has described her own upbringing. In a 2017 speech to the right-leaning American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) she reminisced that as a child in the Bay Area, she collected donations for the Jewish National Fund to plant trees in Israel. In 2019, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency described her Senate record as “more AIPAC than J Street,” referring to the more left-leaning “pro peace” lobbying group.

When it comes to how Harris might differ, even subtly, from Biden, perhaps no issue, foreign or domestic, has gotten more attention than the war in Gaza. 

Halie Soifer, who worked as national security adviser to Harris in the Senate and is now the director of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, told Vox that when it comes to policy on Israel and Gaza, there is little daylight between the two. 

“I think the policy will not change,” she said. “What we have seen is some distinction when it comes to the way they speak about the conflict, with Vice President Harris not only reiterating her commitment to Israel and its security, but also expressing a larger degree of empathy with innocent Palestinian civilians.”

This was reflected in pointed remarks Harris made calling for a ceasefire at a civil rights commemoration in Selma, Alabama, in March (remarks that were reportedly watered down by administration officials) as well as in her convention speech. As my colleague Zack Beauchamp wrote, that speech did not differ particularly from Biden’s talking points but did, rhetorically at least, present “Palestinian aspirations for self-determination as the moral climax of her discussion of the issue.”

Slate’s Fred Kaplan reports that sources close to Harris say she “privately disagrees with [Biden’s] formulation of world politics as a contest between democracy and autocracy … and sees that as oversimplifying and even misleading, given the kinds of allies that we’re sometimes forced to choose.”  The Biden administration has been criticized by some observers for paying attention to the “global south” mainly in the context of competition with Russia and China.

Perhaps reflecting some desire to move beyond this framing, Harris remarked at the Munich Security Conference earlier this year that when visiting countries in Africa, she was constantly asked, “‘Are you here because of China?’ And my answer was, ‘No, we are here because of the people on the continent of Africa.’” 

Bloomberg

It’s also quite possible that Harris’s worldview and foreign policy rhetoric are simply evolving. The senator who, in 2020, said, “I unequivocally agree with the goal of reducing the defense budget and redirecting funding to communities in need” is now the vice president who vows to “ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world.”

Ultimately, campaign rhetoric will only tell you so much about how a president will conduct foreign policy. Some analysts have noted that, as a senator, Harris was in favor of cutting support for Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen, and called for “fundamentally reevaluating” the US-Saudi relationship as a candidate in 2020. But then again, Biden promised on the campaign trail to make Saudi Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman a “pariah” before putting cooperation with the country at the center of his Middle East policy. 

It’s not just that campaign talk is cheap, it’s that, as the noted international relations theorist Mike Tyson put it, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.

George W. Bush came into office promising a “humble” foreign policy that eschewed nation-building crusades. 9/11 changed that. 

Obama first distinguished himself as an opponent of US militarism in the Middle East but will be remembered for expanding the US drone war, the raid that killed Osama Bin Laden, and helping to overthrow the government of Libya. 

Biden’s foreign policy legacy will be determined in large part by his response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the October 7 attacks. 

“Foreign policy priorities, in every administration, are largely dictated by events,” Soifer said. 

If there is a “Harris doctrine,” we’ll learn what it is only if we see her as president. 

David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The wheels on the bus go round and round, and they’re overdue for a major upgrade. The first all-electric school bus fleet to serve a major school district hit the road last week in Oakland, California. The government is spending billions on electrification efforts across the country in an attempt to overhaul the fleet of 480,000 diesel-powered air-polluting school buses. 

Is Russia interfering with the election again?  The Department of Justice believes that Russia used right-wing personalities Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, and Benny Johnson, alleging that since 2022, the former and current Tenet Media members have unwittingly served as a front for Russian agents to spread Russian state-directed content using their online platforms. This isn’t the first time Russia has tried to meddle with American democracy —  read our previous coverage on interference during the 2016 election and the 2020 election.

Tech stocks take a downturn: A massive global stock plunge was triggered this week by news that Nvidia, the world’s leading AI chip manufacturer, was issued a subpoena by the US Justice Department as part of an antitrust investigation. As the third most valuable company in the world, ripples were immediately felt throughout the entire tech sector.

A milestone mishandled: Did you watch this season of The Bachelorette? The finale of Jenn Tran's season as the show's first Asian-American lead was horribly cruel, not only denying her a "happily-ever-after" moment but baring her pain for ratings.

Going to bat for biodiversity: An environmental economist has discovered that in regions where bats are most affected by white nose syndrome, a wildlife disease, the rate of human infant mortality increased by nearly 8 percent. When bat populations shrink, insects increase —  and farmers use more harmful pesticides to combat the problem.

Brainrot 4 Kamala: The Democratic presidential nominee’s campaign has been running “content sludge”-style ads on YouTube, using a chaotic short-video format popularized by Gen Z to capture their attention. [404 Media]

Greta speaks out on Gaza: Earlier this week, 21-year-old environmental activist Greta Thunberg was one of six people arrested at the University of Copenhagen during a protest against the war in Gaza. [The Guardian]  And if you need a refresher on the young Swedish activist, who started making headlines as a teenager, check out our previous coverage here.

Frederic J. Brown/AFP via Getty Images

I desperately wish I could have been at the table when someone pitched My Lady Jane, Amazon's historical period drama/magical fantasy romp/goofy romantic caper. (It kind of defies description.) I just cannot imagine trying to sell this show to a bunch of executives.

First of all, it's about a relatively obscure historical figure: Lady Jane Grey, the woman who was proclaimed Queen of England for a little over a week in the 1500s before Mary took over. Second, it's set in a universe where some people can turn into animals. In fact, the central tension of the show is not the historical dispute between Catholics and Protestants, but an imaginary dispute between the people who can turn into animals and the people who cannot.

All to say: It is way too weird and wacky for this world. But while it has some very real flaws (like the brassy, cutesy narration), it’s a delight to watch this show take a big, risky swing.  

—Byrd Pinkerton, senior podcast producer

IMDB

Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can sign up for it right here. 

And as always, we want to know what you think. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know by filling out this form or just replying to this email. 

Today’s edition was produced and edited by senior editor Lavanya Ramanathan, with contributions from staff editor Melinda Fakuade. We'll see you Monday!

Become a Vox Member

Support our journalism — become a Vox Member and you’ll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more.

This email was sent to you. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution.

View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service.

Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.