And in today's edition of How Brands Win, we'll look into the second C: Competition.
If you missed the article on Company Analysis, you can read it here.
Now let's see how a rental company with seven cars became a global giant, how to find gaps in crowded markets, and how to discover your brand’s unique positioning:
3C Analysis (Competition)
In 1957, World War II war veteran Jack C. Taylor saw an opportunity.
He was working at a Cadillac dealership in St. Louis.
And many customers left their cars there for maintenance or to be sold.
But these customers faced a problem.
When their cars were in the dealership, they needed another car for their daily use.
So they either had to rely on taxis or public transportation.
Or they had to rent another car.
But at the time, all car rental and leasing companies were in the airports.
There were no car rental offices in the city centers.
So Taylor wanted to provide this as a service at the dealership.
He shared his idea with his boss.
And they partnered to start Executive Leasing Company with a seven-car fleet.
Thanks to the dealership, they had customers ready to buy.
So it immediately became a profitable venture.
After a few years, Taylor realized he could leave his job at the dealership to fully focus on growing the car rental company.
And he changed the company’s name to the aircraft carrier he served on during the war — Enterprise.
Enterprise was profitable.
But Taylor wanted to grow.
The question he had was how.
Should they open in the airports and find a way to differentiate themselves?
Or should they stick to city centers?
To decide on Enterprise’s next steps, Taylor did market research himself.
He visited cities and airports around, checking out the competition.
And what he found out surprised him.
First, airports were full of car rental and leasing companies.
Some said they provided the best cars.
Some said only they had unlimited mileage.
And some others claimed they provided the best customer service by “trying harder” than the market leader.
But they were all lined up one next to each other in the airports.
So the competition was fierce.
On the other hand, the picture was different in the city centers.
The problem he noticed at his dealership existed in every city.
Customers had no option to have a car whenever they needed a short-term rental.
They either had to go to the airports.
Or stay without a car.
So Taylor made his decision on how to expand.
They were going to skip airports altogether and open offices only in towns and city centers.
They were going to differentiate Enterprise on convenience.
When you pay attention, the market shows you the way
We’ll talk about the results of Enterprise’s strategy.
But first, let’s think together.
Thanks to his observation while working in the car dealership, Taylor identified an unmet customer need.
And he realized nobody in the market —even beyond his city— provided that value.
So there was a gap that Enterprise could fill.
But not every executive is as lucky as Jack C. Taylor.
Usually, unmet customer needs are not that obvious.
It requires some digging to uncover them.
And that’s why one of the three C’s that drive positioning in our framework is Competition.
There are three main steps to analyze the competition.
I’ll use the Enterprise example to explain them:
1. List the alternatives
First, list all the alternatives to your brand.
If customers don’t buy from you, what other solutions can they use as an alternative?
The question is straightforward, but take these things into account:
Always list the customer’s status quo (not making a purchase and sticking to an existing solution) as an alternative. We’ve talked about how this increases customer inertia. As an example: if you are selling a B2B solution, the internal teams of your target customers can also be your competitors.
Consider alternatives from other market categories. Your business might be competing with them from the customer’s point of view. Remember how McDonald’s milkshakes not only competed with Burger King’s milkshakes but also with bananas and Snickers.
If there are too many alternatives within an indirect competitor category, try to group them. One example. Let’s say you are a sales training provider. LinkedIn is your indirect competitor as it also offers sales courses. But you don’t have to consider LinkedIn, Coursera, and Udemy separately. Only list the category as an alternative (e.g. online education platforms).
So in Enterprise’s case, the main alternatives from the customers’ perspective looked like this:
Hertz
Avis
Budget
Public transportation (indirect)
Taxi (indirect)
2. Find what everybody is competing on
Now you have the list of alternatives.
The next step is finding the key competitive factors that everybody competes on.
Some questions that can help you identify competitive factors:
What value do alternatives claim to deliver? Who are they trying to target?
What are their perceived strengths and weaknesses of alternatives from customers’ perspective?
What are the main reasons non-customers don’t buy any of the alternatives?
In Enterprise’s case, the main competitive factors were:
Price
Cars
Rental mileage
Customer service
Convenience
3. Find the unmet customer needs
You listed the alternatives and the competitive factors.
Now think about how alternatives would score on each factor relative to others.
Then put all alternatives on a map based on the most important competitive factors.
This will visually show the gaps in the market.
Three points to keep in mind here:
In all markets, some competitive factors become “expected” by customers over time. So alternatives will have similar scores for those. A common example in today’s world is good customer service. You can’t differentiate your brand by providing decent customer service anymore — because it’s expectedfrom everybody. If you want to differentiate on an “expected” competitive factor, you have to do something exceptional — like Ritz-Carlton’s $2,000 budget per employee per customer to delight customers.
The competitive factor you’ll choose to differentiate on has to be aligned with your company’s strengths. We’ve talked about that in Company Analysis. So play to your strengths and ignore your weaknesses.
If you can’t find a gap based on the competitive factors you listed, create a new competitive factor to change the game. One example. All pizza restaurants used to compete on taste, ingredients, the way of cooking, etc. But Domino’s ignored all these factors and created a “delivery speed” factor to win.
So let’s put Enterprise’s alternatives on a positional map based on two key factors —cost and convenience— and how they score for each.
The map immediately shows the gap in the market.
Hence it makes Enterprise’s ideal positioning obvious.
Enterprise didn’t have any cost advantage against its direct competitors Hertz or Avis.
And Budget had already claimed the low-cost position.
So competing on cost would be difficult.
But Enterprise could clearly win on convenience.
And the other alternatives?
No car rental company can beat public transportation on cost.
But rental cars are much more convenient — so Enterprise could beat public transportation there.
Taxis?
For regular use, they cost much more than a rental car.
Plus, a rental car is also more convenient than taxis especially if the pickup office is close to where customers live.
That means Enterprise could also win against taxis.
And guess what?
Enterprise’s positioning worked.
Competitors ignored Enterprise at first, thinking it would never succeed.
But Enterprise kept growing only by opening offices in city centers.
They even added pickup services to make things even more convenient for customers.
When others realized the ingenuity of the strategy, it was too late.
Enterprise was already making a 9-figure yearly revenue.
So thanks to creating a different value (and sticking with it for a long time), Enterprise turned from a seven-fleet car rental office into a global giant.
Yes, today you can find Enterprise car rentals in airports.
But they expanded into airports only after 38 years in 1995 when they were already a multi-billion dollar company.
–
The moral of the story?
Every brand has to offer something different to the world.
Customers don’t need more of the same.
But to find your way to differentiate, first you have to know what you are differentiating against.
You have to know the alternatives.
You have to know what factors the market competes on.
I love that you're part of my network. Let's make 2025 epic!! I appreciate you :) Today's hack When is $9 better than $9.89? If your purchase is based on emotion, then leave out the cents.
Since the early 20th century, writing has become simpler. More direct. But Edgar Allan Poe shows how a paragraph about madness should feel MAD.
Have we lost interest in investing in the human side of sales? To view this email as a web page, click here saastr daily newsletter This edition of the SaaStr Daily is sponsored in part by Prismatic
The Daily Coach continued its conversation with Jon Giesbrecht, Director of Mental Performance and Player Development for the Vancouver Bandits, about overcoming setbacks, building lasting habits, and
Also: A first look at 2024 PE data; We surveyed 53 VCs on a variety of topics, including the AI boom, deep tech trends, and fundraising expectations. Read online | Don't want to receive these
I love that you're part of my network. Let's make 2025 epic!! I appreciate you :) Today's hack How to drive more value for your SaaS? Let a manual job happen, then offer automation in