Good morning. After reiterating that OpenAI is ‘not for sale,’ CEO Sam Altman said that Elon Musk is probably not a “happy person … Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity. I feel for the guy.”

Musk just submitted a $97.4 billion bid to buy the nonprofit that controls OpenAI, a move that could complicate OpenAI’s pending conversion to a for-profit enterprise.

— Ian Krietzberg, Editor-in-Chief, The Deep View

In today’s newsletter:

🎙️ Podcast

The latest episode of The Deep View: Conversations — a wide-ranging exploration of the ethics of AI with the Director of the Markulla Center’s Internet Ethics program — is out! Check it out below: 

AI for Good: Whale tracking 

The Project CETI initiative is guided by one main goal: to understand whale sounds. A massive undertaking employing legions of linguists, machine learning specialists, natural language processing experts and marine biologists, the project — like many entrants in the AI field — is limited by the data it can gather. 

What happened: In an effort to enhance its whale sounds database, a team of Project CETI researchers developed a new machine learning framework that leverages sensors and autonomous drones to predict where whales will surface. 

Why it matters: Beyond advancing CETI’s efforts at the data collection necessary to better understand the meaning behind whale calls, such an algorithm also has conservation implications, as it can be leveraged to “help ships avoid striking whales while at the surface.”

Midnight Deadline: Hours Left to Invest in The Biggest Disruption to IP Since Disney 🚀

Today’s the last day for investors to get a piece of some of the biggest names in entertainment.

Elf Labs secured 100+ historic trademarks for legendary characters like Cinderella & Snow White, and are giving investors a rare opportunity to tap into the $2T entertainment & merchandising market.

Not only have they signed new global licensing deals across toys, apparel, and food—they’re also using patented AI, AR & VR tech to bring these characters to life on a revolutionary new platform. Think next-gen immersive entertainment and AI powered talking toys. 

But here’s the catch—only limited shares remain.

Cinderella’s magic ended at midnight—don’t let yours—Invest Before Midnight.

EU funnels $200 billion into AI, says the race is ‘far from over’ 

The news: The European Union on Tuesday launched what it is calling “Invest AI,” an initiative to funnel some 200 billion euros ($206.5 billion) into a union-wide artificial intelligence build-out. 

The details: Part of the money will be allocated to the construction of four new AI “gigafactories,” which will be used to train “the most complex, very large, AI models.” Each of these data centers will feature racks of roughly 100,000 state-of-the-art AI chips, a push that alone could cost north of $12 billion. 

“We want Europe to be one of the leading AI continents. And this means embracing a way of life where AI is everywhere,” EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech at the summit. “Too often, I hear that Europe is late to the race – while the US and China have already gotten ahead. I disagree. Because the AI race is far from over.”

This shortly follows the Commission’s announcement of a new project to build a series of state-of-the-art, open-source LLMs. 

The landscape: The EU has been roundly criticized for its regulatory approach to AI, which, though contradictory, somewhat vague and full of caveats, represents the clearest, strictest set of country-wide laws regarding the technology. But von der Leyen acknowledged that the Commission will “have to cut red tape — and we will.” 

The Paris Summit concluded with a vague, heavily criticized statement on the globally cooperative development of ethical AI, a statement that the U.S. and U.K. refused to sign. 

Webinar: GenAI Use Cases and Challenges in Healthcare - Fiddler x Mount Sinai

Register to learn:

👉 Register and we’ll send you the replay afterward

Judge rules against AI’s ‘fair use’ defense

The news: Thomson Reuters successfully convinced a judge that the ‘fair use’ defense does not protect the AI-powered ingestion and regurgitation of copyrighted material. 

Judge Stephanos Bibas gave the first and fourth factors to Thomson Reuters, and the second and third to Ross Intelligence. Weighing the value of the factors, Biba rejected Ross’s defense. 

The impact: This is the first clear-cut ruling we have yet had on whether the ‘fair use’ defense holds any water.

Randy McCarthy, a U.S. patent attorney from the national law firm Hall Estill., called the case “notable, but also relatively narrow because it does not deal with generative AI,” meaning it’s unclear how it will impact all the other ongoing AI-related copyright lawsuits.

“One thing is clear (at least in this case), merely using copyrighted material as training data to an AI cannot be said to be fair use per se,” McCarthy said.

Study: Most people can’t identify deepfakes 

The news: A new study out of biometric cybersecurity firm iProov found that an overwhelming majority of people are incapable of accurately distinguishing real images and videos from AI-generated deepfakes. And it’s a problem. 

The details: The study tested a cohort of 2,000 U.S. and U.K.-based consumers, exposing them to a string of real and deepfaked content. Only 0.1% of participants were able to correctly distinguish all the real and deepfaked content. 

Deepfakes have been surging in a number of forms, particularly since early 2023, though the inception of the application goes back several years before ChatGPT went live. 

What generative AI has enabled on this front is the widespread democratization of technology that has, in turn, enabled the targeted harassment of women and girls — celebrities and high school teens alike — through a surge in nonconsensual deepfake pornography; we’ve also seen surges both in political and other forms of misinformation alongside a massive increase in fraud, spanning everything from faked video calls and stolen company assets to fake phone calls demanding ransom payments. 

And indeed, fraud numbers — especially scam-related fraud — have been spiking significantly since 2023. 

iProov identified a 704% increase in face-swapping in 2024 alone.

You can test your detection skills here. 

When it comes to cybersecurity, considering the entire world is built on the back of digital technology, the implications of this proliferation — and peoples’ inability to recognize it — are significant. 

The solution to the problem involves policy and regulation, at least in part. But it also involves a broad shift in mindset to a place of zero-trust in digital technologies, alongside the creation of technological shields. 

iProov — which you might encounter if you ever sign in to IRS.gov — exists to provide that third prong in the form of visual, digital biometric verification. Ajay Amlani, iProov’s head of Americas, told me late last year that iProov’s verification solution is based around a series of randomized, different-colored lights playing across the face of the user. 

The push for biometrics is widespread. Apple’s Face ID is perhaps the best example of this, and, according to Apple, Face ID isn’t actually that vulnerable. It uses infrared lasers to map the geometry of your face, meaning a 2D photograph or image can’t fool it. 

But Amlani told me that “the protections against deepfakes are still not necessarily to the point that they need to be without a company like iProov, and that's where we come in.” 

The basis of most, if not all, issues relevant to artificial intelligence do really come down to a lack of literacy around the tech and its impacts. While there are measures that ought to be taken by cybersecurity companies and policymakers alike, ordinary people still need to adjust to an environment where you cannot, by default, trust anything you see or hear digitally.

Unfortunately, people are collectively probably going to have to go through quite a bit of hurt before that lesson really sinks in.

🤔 Your thought process:

Selected Image 1 (Left):

Selected Image 2 (Right):

💭 A poll before you go

Thanks for reading today’s edition of The Deep View!

We’ll see you in the next one.

Here’s your view on AI and critical thinking:

35% of you think GenAI actually stimulates critical thinking, rather than the opposite.

22% think it does degrade their critical thinking, and it’s a problem. The rest aren’t sure.

Yeah, it’s bad:

Something else:

If you want to get in front of an audience of 200,000+ developers, business leaders and tech enthusiasts, get in touch with us here.