| | | | HOUSEKEEPING đ¨ | Planning some leave in a couple of weeks time. Itâs pretty draining at times running Athyna, while also pumping out these newsletter. As much as I love both projects, I am due for a well earned rest I think. | My plan is to head down to San Martin de los Andes, accompanied by my little perrito (Spanish for little doggy), Ziggy.
I am planning a final 3-week Patagonia trip filled with reading, chilling, hiking etc. before heading back to Australia for good in May.
I am going to be very sad to leave Argentina, this place has become my second home. But my mum told me something once that I will never forget, and that was that; âItâs better to have loved and lost, than to never have loved at all.â |
| |
|
|
| | BUSINESS STORY đď¸ | Deel, Ripping & The History Of Corporate Espionage | I grew up a big fan of Mad Magazine, and in particular a fan of their regular Spy vs Spy section. As I grew out of my early teens, I graduated to more adult spy escapades, highlightedâlike a lot of kids my ageâby countless hours of GoldenEye on the Nintendo 64. To me, Pierce Brosnan will go down as the equally worst, and best Bond of all time due to his underperformance in the movies, and outperformance in the video game respectively. Lately, I have actually taken to the British spy drama, Slow Horses, on Apple TV+. Itâs a decent watch. | But nothing I have seen or consumed in spy-world prepared me for what I would see on Twitter on March 17, 2025, when Rippling CEO, Parker Conrad, announced that Rippling were suing Deel for âcultivating a spy at Rippling & orchestrating a long-running trade-secret theft.â Corporate espionage of the B2B world. | | Today then, off the back of this news, I plan to break down this aforementioned heist of insider information, along with the history of espionagus corporatus, and if you are lucky (and you are) a sprinkling of extra example of people taking the proverbial mickey out of their competitors. Letâs investigate. | What is âespionageâ anyway? | Espionage (/ËÉspÉŞÉnÉË(d)Ę/) as per Googleâs definition is âthe practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political and military information.â Similar works include spying, undercover work, cloak-and-dagger activities. We all know this. Itâs the stuff of Bond, James Bond. But how common is espionage, where did it start, and who employs it today? | | Firstly, let me point out that as per Sun Tzuâs, The Art of War, there are five different kinds of spy: the local spy, the inside spy, the reverse spy, the dead spy, and the living spy. Below is a breakdown of each spy type and their modern day equivalent. | Type | Definition | Modern equivalent |
---|
The local spy | These are hired from among local people. | Insiders who are already working for the enemy and secretly provide information. | The inside spy | These are hired from among enemy officials. | A double agent in a rival company, an employee leaking secrets, or even corporate mole placements. | The reverse spy | Enemy spies who have been captured and turned to work for you. | Competitor employees who get flipped, either by hiring them or coercing them into revealing secrets. | The dead spy | Spies sent with false information, knowing they will be caught and feed misinformation to the enemy. | Controlled leaks, fake product launches, or misleading PR campaigns to confuse competitors. | The living spy | Spies who gather intelligence and successfully return to report their findings. | Corporate intelligence operatives who gather data from conferences, trade shows, or through networking. |
| The earliest documented spies appear in biblical texts, dating all the way back to approximately 1200 BCE. The Book of Numbers tells how Moses dispatched 12 spies into Canaan to gather intelligence before the Israelites attempted to settle the territory. Their mission was to assess the land, inhabitants, defenses, and resources. | The Persian also didnât mind a bit of espionage (circa 522 BCE - 330 BCE) with the Achaemenid Empire under Darius I. King Daris, also known as Darius the Great, had an intelligence network called âThe Kingâs Eyes and Ears.â This was essentially one of the first recorded secret services. | Corporate espionage, though, may have started truly with The British East India company (1600s-1800s), who used spies to undermine competitors (like the unoriginally named Dutch East India Company) and even whole governments. |  | British East India Company. |
| Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison were said to have planted spies on one another, the KGB infiltrating American companies through the Cold War, and China today is probably spying on you and your technology right now. The list goes on. Espionage today is not seen among the fictional Jason Bournes of the world. Itâs alive and well. And no more so it seemsâcanât believe I am about to write thisâthan in the world workforce management platforms. | A history of beef | Before diving headfirst into the corporate espionage, it behooves us to take a quick detour down Rivalry Road. The two companies in question, Rippling and Deel, already had a nice little competitive streak going, before it started to get ugly late last year when Rippling created a landing page with the header; âDonât Buy Snake Oilâ in reference to Deelâs security and compliance claims. They even went as far as to program an old school Nokia 8210 style game of snake. Each time you were successful with your snake directing, a new level of Deelâs (supposed) falsehoods would be presented to you. Pretty wild really. | | Things turned uglier again when sales leader at Deel, Chris Lee, told Ripping to âsuck a d*ckâ in their chatbot thread, leading the COO of Rippling to not only share this on Twitter but share Chrisâ email, phone number and all. Itâs not nice to tell someone to S-a-D, but in this case, I kinda feel like it was warranted. This whole thing makes Rippling look terrible. |  | Theo - t3.gg @theo |  |
| |
Am I understanding this right? Rippling⌠âŚcalled Deel âsnake oilâ âŚthen made a marketing campaign with a game and Deelâs logo as the snake âŚwith an automatic chat bot on the page âŚand posted a Deel employeeâs info when they got angry at them in said automatic chat? wtf? | |  | | 12:05 AM ⢠Dec 4, 2024 | | | | 138 Likes 4 Retweets | 14 Replies |
|
| The Deel is better than Rippling / Rippling is better than Deel comparison pages are actually value too. Carbon copies of one another. Kinda as if they just hit their version of the âinvert coloursâ option on their iPhone. Whoâs really better is anyoneâs guess. | |
|
| | | | Scale globally with Paddle. | Self-serve software is global by default. But selling to every country is complicated. Thatâs where Paddle comes in. | They manage payments, sales tax, and compliance on every transaction around the world, so you can focus on what you do best: building a great product and serving your customers. | As a Merchant of Record, Paddle makes it easy for SaaS and digital product companies to sell anywhere. | Wherever you want to take your business, go there with Paddle. | | Interested in sponsoring these emails? See our partnership options here. |
| |
| |
| | Deel vs Rippling | And now we come to todayâs main event. The allegations and incoming lawsuit from Parker Conrad and his $13 billion dollar Rippling, to the $12 billion dollar firm by the name of Deel, on the grounds of corporate espionage. âOur lawsuit alleges Deel cultivated a spy at Rippling & orchestrated a long-running trade-secret theft,â Parker cited in his March 17 tweet. | The Rippling founder claimed that Deel had embedded a spy inside of their organisation to mine their trade secrets. And that the spy searched for the term âdeelâ a legendary 23 times per day while working as a Rippling employee. |  | Parker Conrad @parkerconrad |  |
| |
Rippling sued @deel today. Our lawsuit alleges Deel cultivated a spy at Rippling & orchestrated a long-running trade-secret theft. The spy searched âdeelâ in our systems 23 times per day on avg, letting him spy on Deelâs own customers who were considering a switch to Rippling. | |    | | 12:42 PM ⢠Mar 17, 2025 | | | | 8.3K Likes 574 Retweets | 378 Replies |
|
| Why would Deel go to the lengths of doing something like this I bet you are wondering? Wellâsimple really. B2B software accounts can be very spicy at the larger end of town. I asked ChatGPT 4.5âs to do some deep research for me on the lifetime value of an enterprise client and it came back with an estimate of several millions of dollars for both firms. | Think on what a successful spy might be able to do inside of Rippling. A spy could find pitch decks for new deals in pipeline to leverage against at Deel. They could go snooping out for clients that are looking to defect from Deel to Rippling. And conversely, they could find customers that are unhappy with their current Rippling experience and report back to prospect heavily towards those accounts. | corporate.bro770K followers |  |
|  | View more on Instagram |
|
|
| Not to mention GTM strategies, corp dev, unhappy executives and teams to poach from, the list goes on and on. In the same ChatGPT thread, I asked how much value Deel could have siphoned from Rippling over the course of a 12 month period and it came back with an estimate several to tens of millions. I think that could be massively underselling it. | So how did Rippling find this alleged double agent in their midst? Simple. They set what is commonly referred to as a âhoneypot.â Specifically, a fake Slack channel supposedly filled with embarrassing dirt on Deel. Get a load of this passage from the 50 page official complaint document. |
| |
| Astoundingly, this hijacking of Ripplingâs most prized data appears to have been orchestrated by Deelâs senior leadership. The smoking gun came earlier this month, when Rippling set forth a test, or what is known by security professionals as a âhoneypot.â Rippling knew that Deel was most likely to activate its spy if faced with potentially damaging press, and indeed, that is how the spy originally revealed himself.
So, to confirm Deelâs involvement, Ripplingâs General Counsel sent a legal letter to Deelâs senior leadership identifying a recently established Slack channel called âd-defectors,â in which (the letter implied) Rippling employees were discussing information that Deel would find embarrassing if made public. In reality, the âd-defectorsâ channel was not used by Rippling employees and contained no discussions at all. It had never been searched for or accessed by the spy, would not have come up in any of the spyâs previous searches, and the spy had no legitimate reason to access the channel. Crucially, this legal letter was only sent to three recipients, all associated with Deel: Deelâs Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, and General Counsel (Philippe Bouaziz), Deelâs Head of U.S. Legal (Spiros Komis), and Deelâs outside counsel. Neither the letter nor the #d-defectors channel was known to anyone outside of Ripplingâs investigative team and the Deel recipients. Yet, just hours after Rippling sent the letter to Deelâs executives and counsel, Deelâs spy searched for and accessed the #d-defectors channelâproving beyond any doubt that Deelâs top leadership, or someone acting on their behalf, had fed the information on the #d-defectors channel to Deelâs spy inside Rippling. |
|
| That, ladies and gentlemen, is what in the spy business we call a good old fashioned honeytrap. | Once busted, when lawyers later tried to confiscate his phone under court order, the alleged oath-breaker fled into a bathroom, locked himself inside, and seemed to try flushing his phone down the toilet rather than hand it over. He then stormed out, ignoring legal warnings, declaring heâd "take the risk," and vanished. | âWeeks after Rippling is accused of violating sanctions law in Russia and seeding falsehoods about Deel, Rippling is trying to shift the narrative with these sensationalized claims,â a spokesperson said in a statement provided to TechCrunch. âWe deny all legal wrongdoing and look forward to asserting our counterclaims.â | Athynaâs espionage Ă trois | Iâll admit it. I see value in corporate espionage. Iâm not sure Iâll be embedding any insiders in the organisations of our competitors anytime soon, but I went as far as to build a somewhat robust competitive intelligence program at my startup, Athyna. We have internal databases tracking 50+ direct and indirect competitors. I think itâs a super smart practice. Especially if you in a somewhat commodified space. | | We donât spend too much time on this for the most part but every so often we will do a deep dive on a company, and try to find out how they message, what is their offer, how and where they hire, and more. In our databases we categorise companies by having deep, medium or shallow understanding. | *Note: I was told that what I am about to tell you in the next few lines is a bad idea, that it will make me look bad, but I am going against that recommendation in the interest of being fully open sourced, as is the spirit of this newsletter. | We have even gone as far as to create fake profiles to take demos, get sales decks and ask questions to some of our more senior competitors. I want to see what makes them tick. | | These types of initiatives are also engaging for the team. Itâs as if you are playing a little spy game yourself. An us versus them drama. I think itâs healthy and for the most part, I donât wish any harm to our competitors. Sure, there are one or two that I have sworn to myself that I will personally burn to the ground, but for the most part, I see it as healthy competition. | *Note: I was also told to take that âburn them to the groundâ line out too. Because it might make me look like a psycho, but the truth is, I kinda am a psycho, and I do want to burn a couple of their business to the ground. | My personal intelligence muse | The most interesting person Iâve ever heard talk about this type of competitive intelligence program is Patrick Campbell, the founder and CEO, of ProfitWell, which was recently acquired by Paddle for $200M. Patrick has the most detailed guide in the world when it comes to competitive intelligence. And let me be clear when I say Iâm not exaggerating when I say that. Itâs a 20,000 word deep dive, highlighting everything from marketing mindshare and resource strength, to using a market command matrix and more. The guy is literally the Picasso of intel. | | Patrick claims that any competitor intelligence program (even the US governmentâs) has three main parts: 1) reconnaissance, identifying your competitors, 2) monitoring and extracting intel, and 3) intelligence operations, playbooks to attack and defend. | The what | The why / how |
---|
Reconnaissance and identifying | Who exactly are you competitors? Here weâll answer that question by automatically creating your marketâs Market Command Matrix. From there youâll know exactly who to worry about, spend time on, and ignore. | Monitoring and exacting | Once we know who we should be tracking, we need a system for collecting research and intelligence on those competitors. Monitoring these competitors builds your judgement and market instincts to properly deploy the playbooks for siphoning revenue from competitors. | Intelligence operations | Knowing who to track and monitoring them is just the first piece of the puzzle. Now we need to deploy our revenue playbooks at the right time. |
| The details above are lifted directly from Patrickâs resource, so full credit to him. If you are interested, I really recommend to check it out. In what I swear is totally coincidental news, I am doing a webinar next week with the team at Paddle, who acquired Patrickâs company. Weâll be talking about how I use the tool he built, ProfitWell metrics, to tell data driven revenue stories to our team. | |
|
| | | đĄÂ Note: Sorry about that, honest pitch I swear. If this is cool to you, sign up to grab a spot here. |
| |
| |
| Other famous espionagery | In honour of Deelâs attempt to steal corporate secrets from a competitor, here a chronological list of other recent attempts to steal the âsecret sauce.â Or in one case, quite literally the 11 herbs and spices. | Kodak vs. Fuji, 1980sâ1990s: Kodak accused Fuji of aggressively spying on its film-development technology. Though no clear legal winner emerged, their rivalry was marked by bitter accusations and prolonged suspicion. Volkswagen vs. General Motors, 1993â1996: VW poached JosĂŠ Ignacio LĂłpez, a high-level GM executive, who brought along confidential internal documents. GM sued, resulting in a $100 million payout and LĂłpez's resignation. Gillette vs. Schick, 1998: Gillette accused Schick of deploying private investigators to obtain intel on their top-secret razor developments. The bitter dispute led to reciprocal lawsuits, public embarrassment, and damaged reputations.
| | Boeing vs. Lockheed Martin, late 1990sâ2006: Boeing stole rocket-launch secrets from Lockheed Martin to secure lucrative NASA and Air Force contracts. Boeing ultimately paid a record $615 million in fines. Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo, 2006: Coke employees tried selling secret recipes and proprietary documents to Pepsi. Surprisingly ethical, Pepsi reported them, leading to an FBI sting operation and multiple arrests. Hewlett-Packard board spying scandal, 2006: HP hired private investigators who illegally obtained phone records of board members and journalists to root out corporate leaks. The scandal caused public backlash, resignations, and hefty fines. Monsanto seed espionage, 2013â2016: Employees from a Chinese agricultural company attempted to steal genetically engineered corn seeds from Monsantoâs U.S. fields. The spies were caught and sentenced to prison, spotlighting the seriousness of agricultural espionage. Uber vs. Waymo (Google), 2017: Waymo engineer Anthony Levandowski allegedly took thousands of confidential files when joining Uberâs self-driving division. After heated legal battles, Uber paid Waymo $245 million in equity to settle. Kentucky Fried Chickenâs secret recipe, various attempts: KFCâs famous blend of â11 herbs and spicesâ is notoriously protected. In 2001, the company sued individuals attempting to sell an alleged stolen recipe online.
| Summary | And thatâs the story of what might be the juiciest startup story since the Sam Altman x OpenAI firing / rehiring bonanza of late 2023. It really is quite juicy for the world of the startup nerd. This tweet I found recently sums it up best. |  | Isaiah Granet @zaygranet |  |
| |
Rippling vs Deel is like Kendrick v Drake for people incapable of holding a conversation at a party | | 6:49 PM ⢠Mar 17, 2025 | | | | 839 Likes 21 Retweets | 9 Replies |
|
| So go out there and spy nicely my founder friends. And if you donât decide to play nicely, make sure that whatever it is you do, you do it so extremely that they will make an HBO drama out of it someday. Cheers. | Extra reading | | And that's it! You can follow me on Twitter and LinkedIn and also donât forget to check out Athyna while youâre at it. |
|
| | BRAIN FOOD đ§ Â
I just watched a TED talk on a topic I hadnât seen so much buzz around, and thought I should share it. This one is about AI, and how AI models are built using unlicensed creative workâmusic, writing, artâwithout permission or payment. |  | How AI Models Steal Creative Work â and What to Do About It | Ed Newton-Rex | TED |
|
| Ed, the guest speaker, makes a strong case for why artists and writers should actually get compensated for the use of their work and he offers a pretty reasonable fix. If youâre a creator yourself or youâre into the industry, go give this one a watch. |
|
| | TWEETS OF THE WEEK đŁÂ |  | Robert Sterling @RobertMSterling |  |
| |
SO THERE ARE THESE TWO HR SOFTWARE COMPANIES CALLED DEEL AND RIPPLING. THEY HATE EACH OTHER. THEYâRE LIKE THE HARKONNENS AND ATREIDES OF PAYROLL. RIPPLING JUST FOUND OUT DEEL HAD A SPY IN THEIR OFFICE. THEY SET UP A FAKE SLACK CHANNEL TO CATCH HIM, BUT HE LOCKED HIMSELF IN A⌠x.com/i/web/status/1⌠| |  | | 1:41 PM ⢠Mar 18, 2025 | | | | 720 Likes 43 Retweets | 38 Replies |
|
|  | Sam Parr @thesamparr |  |
| |
This timeline is hard to understand. Just nuts. | |  | | 3:42 PM ⢠Mar 19, 2025 | | | | 297 Likes 11 Retweets | 28 Replies |
|
|  | Bill Kerr @bill_kerrrrr |  |
| |
Remember. We all have to start somewhere. | |     | | 1:28 PM ⢠Jun 27, 2024 | | | | 11 Likes 0 Retweets | 5 Replies |
|
|
|
| | | | | P.S. Want to work together? | | | Thatâs it from me. See you next week, Doc đŤĄÂ
P.P.S. Letâs connect on LinkedIn and Twitter. |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|