Dan Patrick and the damaged Republican psyche
Welcome to Popular Information, a newsletter about politics and power — written by Judd Legum and Tesnim Zekeria. There is no greater proponent of Trump's false claims about voter fraud in the 2020 election than Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick (R). Patrick described Trump's wild claims of rigged voting machines and stuffed drop boxes as "not only essential to determine the outcome of this election," but "essential to maintain our democracy and restore faith in future elections." Patrick was so convinced there was a cover-up of the real election results that, a week after the election, he offered a $1 million reward "to incentivize, encourage and reward people to come forward and report voter fraud." Patrick also supported a lawsuit, filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton at the Supreme Court, to throw out election results in four states won by Biden. None of that worked, and now Patrick is turning his attention to passing Senate Bill 7 (SB 7) in the Texas legislature, a measure to restrict voting in Texas. Trump won Texas and there is no evidence of any significant voter fraud in the 2020 election. Paxton devoted 22,000 hours to investigating potential voter fraud and ended up finding 16 cases of people who listed invalid addresses on their voter registration forms. But, even though Texas already has the strictest voting laws in the country, Patrick and his allies are determined to make voting even more difficult. This effort has hit some snags. Corporations, including iconic Texas companies like Delta and Dell, have come out in opposition to the law. Some Republicans in the legislature are expressing doubts. "I don’t know if the measures that are being talked about are necessary,” Texas Representative Kyle Kacal (R) said this week. "I don’t know how much fraud there really is, but people need the opportunity to vote." Texas Representative Lyle Larson has also suggested he’s leaning against the bill. The new Speaker of the Texas House, Dade Phelan (R), has not publicly supported the legislation. Republicans can only afford to lose nine Republicans in the House and still pass the bill. All of this has Patrick and other Republicans agitated. Patrick let out his frustrations in a wild 35-minute press conference on Tuesday in which he berated a reporter for asking a "stupid question," excoriated American Airlines, and repeatedly lied about his efforts to restrict voting in Texas. Trust the systemAccording to Patrick, SB 7 is needed because “Americans no longer trust the system.”
Yet, Patrick failed to acknowledge his role in eroding public trust before and after Election Day. In May 2020, as officials in the state worked on expanding mail-in voting in response to the COVID-19 crisis, Patrick called these efforts “the greatest scam ever” by Democrats and said that it “will destroy America if we allow it to happen.” In June 2020, Patrick said on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News show that expanded mail-in voting would spur the demise of democracy :
Just days before the election, Patrick stated on live television that if Trump “loses Pennsylvania or North Carolina… or Florida, they'll lose it because [Democrats] stole it.” Then, after the election, Patrick offered a cash reward for evidence of voter fraud. But even with a million-dollar cash reward on the line, Patrick has yet to provide evidence to back his allegations of fraud. His justification of SB 7 rests on the mere perception of fraud as opposed to its actual existence — a perception he played a big role in creating. At the press conference, Patrick acknowledged that evidence of voter fraud is virtually nonexistent. Yet, he is still confident it is happening. “Mail-in ballot fraud is so hard to catch and to prove, but Democrats and Republicans alike know it exists, and that’s why we have to secure our mail-in ballot,” he said. Patrick's big liePatrick also claimed that the criticism of the bill was unwarranted because it changed nothing about any aspect of the voting process in Texas:
If that's the case, why is anyone objecting to SB 7? The reason is that Patrick was lying. Later in the same press conference, Patrick detailed legal changes SB 7 would make to mail-in, Election Day, and early voting in Texas. Patrick freely admitted that these changes were specifically targeted at Harris County, the largest in Texas, which includes Houston. It has one of the largest concentrations of Black voters in the state. First, the bill would ban drive-thru voting in Texas. 127,000 voters in Harris County cast their votes early in drive-thru locations in 2020. And others voted at a drive-thru location on Election Day. Republicans sued to invalidate the votes but lost. Patrick claimed he is actually doing people of color a favor because most don't own cars.
SB 7 would make other important changes to in-person voting. It would require countywide polling locations to have a roughly equal number of voting machines, effectively banning the use of arenas as mega-polling locations. Arenas were used in cities across Texas to reduce lines and increase safety across the state. It would also allow observers to film voters at polling locations, which could subject voters to intimidation and harassment. Second, SB 7 would outlaw 24-hour voting locations anywhere in the state. In 2020, Harris County operated eight 24-hour voting locations. The practice helps reduce early voting lines and provides opportunities to vote for people who work odd hours. "Hopefully in the future, dozens of counties follow our lead and offer a night of 24-hour voting to support their voters," Harris County Clerk Chris Hollins said. Patrick, without citing evidence, claimed these locations were insecure.
Third, Harris County also sent absentee ballot applications to all residents 65 or older. (The county attempted to send them to all voters but was blocked by the Texas Supreme Court.) SB 7 would prohibit sending anyone a ballot application they didn't specifically request. Patrick asserts, without evidence, that sending applications to registered voters invites fraud. He raised the specter of dead people voting, a favorite tactic of Trump.
SB 7 would also prohibit the use of drop boxes to return mail-in ballots. So, despite Patrick's angry denials, SB 7 imposes significant new restrictions on early, Election Day, and mail-in voting. "Everything I said today is true. Every fact I gave you is correct. And, if I’m off a number and I misspoke, I’ll correct it," Patrick insisted. The not-so-friendly skiesEchoing Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Patrick said that companies that speak out against voting restrictions should expect payback. American Airlines issued a statement saying they were "strongly opposed" to SB 7 and "others like it." The company said it had an obligation to "honor the sacrifices made by generations of Americans to protect and expand the right to vote." Now that American Airlines has spoken, Patrick warned the company not to come to him and Governor Abbott with "their hand out" because that's not "the way we do business."
Patrick referred to American Airlines derisively throughout the press conference, frequently asking rhetorically if "Mr. American Airlines" would approve of various aspects of the bill. He also repeatedly claimed that no one at American Airlines read the bill, which the company denies. The last questionAfter a lengthy soliloquy, Patrick took a few questions from the press. Christian Flores, a reporter for CBS News, asked if he planned on giving the $1 million reward to Pennsylvania Governor John Fetterman (D), who provided Patrick with evidence that a Trump supporter in Pennsylvania tried to cast an illegal vote. "Don't ask me a stupid question," Patrick said. "I didn't come here to take stupid questions from the media." And with that, the press conference was over. On Monday, Popular Information broke the news that Facebook, Google, AT&T, and other prominent corporations that issued statements in support of voting rights had recently donated tens of thousands of dollars to the RSLC, a GOP group pushing voter suppression bills. On Tuesday, Andrew Ross Sorkin, citing Popular Information's reporting, covered the story in the New York Times:
You can support independent journalism that exposes corporate hypocrisy by becoming a paid subscriber. Popular Information is fiercely independent and does not accept advertising. This newsletter only exists because of the support of readers like you. |
Older messages
McConnell versus the First Amendment
Tuesday, April 6, 2021
In recent days, more corporations have spoken out against voter suppression laws. In Texas, American Airlines and Dell announced their opposition to two major bills to restrict voting under
Facebook pledged to suspend political donations, then quietly funneled $50,000 to GOP group pushing voter suppress…
Monday, April 5, 2021
On January 11, Facebook announced that "following last week's awful violence" it was suspending donations from its political committee "for at least the current quarter, while we
A corporate reckoning on voter suppression
Thursday, April 1, 2021
In early March, Popular Information identified 22 major corporations that financially backed the sponsors of voter suppression legislation in Georgia. We asked each company whether they supported the
Texas' voter suppression bills are fueled by millions in corporate cash
Wednesday, March 31, 2021
Texas already has the most restrictive voting laws in the country. But with the state trending blue, Governor Greg Abbott (R) and Republicans in the Texas legislature are pushing a series of draconian
Media crisis, border facts
Wednesday, March 31, 2021
Upon assuming office, Biden has made a number of changes to Trump's immigration policy. Among other actions, Biden cut off funding for the construction of the border wall and suspended enrollment
You Might Also Like
What the Tweens Actually Want
Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Plus: What Neko Case can't live without. The Strategist Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an affiliate commission.
Dr. Oz Shilled for an Alternative to Medicare
Monday, November 25, 2024
Columns and commentary on news, politics, business, and technology from the Intelligencer team. Intelligencer politics Dr. Oz Shilled for an Alternative to Medicare Trump's pick to oversee the
7 button-ups we love
Monday, November 25, 2024
Plus: A deal on a very giftable robe View in browser Ad The Recommendation Ad Our favorite button-ups A view of the torsos of two people wearing button-up shirts with their hands in the pockets of
Tuesday Briefing: Trump’s criminal cases likely to be dismissed
Monday, November 25, 2024
Plus, a possible cease-fire deal in Lebanon. View in browser|nytimes.com Ad Morning Briefing: Asia Pacific Edition November 26, 2024 Author Headshot By Justin Porter Good morning. We're covering a
Organ Grinder
Monday, November 25, 2024
Your Aging Parts, Robots Advance ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Ready For Master Plan Season Two?
Monday, November 25, 2024
We are ready to start Master Plan season two, which will be just as powerful as season
Five new startups to watch
Monday, November 25, 2024
Former Amazon Care leader's startup provides virtual support for caregivers | SparkToro co-founder launches game studio ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Get your ticket for AWS re:Invent,
☕ Rage against the returns
Monday, November 25, 2024
Retailers take steps to curb returns. November 25, 2024 Retail Brew Presented By Bloomreach It's the last Monday before Black Friday, and Chili's just released a line of bedding products that
☕ Cann do
Monday, November 25, 2024
Why the beverage brand Cann is putting one creator front and center. November 25, 2024 Marketing Brew Presented By Klaviyo It's Monday. Ahead of Thanksgiving, the box office is having its best
A trans bathroom controversy in Congress.
Monday, November 25, 2024
We get into a recently proposed bathroom bill for federal buildings. A trans bathroom controversy in Congress. We get into a recently proposed bathroom bill for federal buildings. By Isaac Saul • 25