The Chinese Blitzkrieg on its own companies

Finshots

The Chinese Blitzkrieg on its own companies

The Chinese Blitzkrieg on its own companies | Finshots Daily Newsletter

In today's Finshots we provide a new explanation on why China may be attacking its own homegrown companies


Business

The Story

Chinese tech companies are getting hammered. Some stocks are down 10–25% after the Chinese state began scuttling IPOs and implementing a wave of new regulations specifically aimed at reining in homegrown companies. All in all, some reports suggest that these actions have shaved off close to $1 trillion in market cap these past few months. And while nobody knows for sure why the Chinese state is seemingly hellbent on destroying its own companies, it hasn’t stopped people from speculating.

On the one side, you have sceptics proclaiming the end of Chinese capitalism. That this is what the Chinese communist party always intended to achieve — Let private enterprise thrive and then take over everything in a bid to implement their communist agenda.

On the other side, you have optimists rationalizing the government’s intervention. But realistically speaking, how can anybody justify this blitzkrieg? How can the optimists confidently state that China will continue to aid a free market enterprise after it trampled on multiple homegrown IPOs these past few months?

Well, it’s complicated. Take, for instance, the legendary investor Ray Dalio. His thesis is that Chinese policymakers have always sided with the people and not necessarily the capitalists. As he wrote in one article 

China is a state capitalist system which means that the state runs capitalism to serve the interests of most people and that policymakers won’t let the sensitivities of those in the capital markets and rich capitalists stand in the way of doing what they believe is best for the most people of the country

Meaning they’ll put up with all the shenanigans so long as it doesn’t hurt the public interest. But when Chinese tech companies break rules and go about their business with little regard for privacy rules and competition laws, policymakers will feel compelled to act.

For instance, when Chinese authorities pulled up Alibaba last year, they did so after initiating an antitrust investigation against the e-commerce giant. It was an inquiry prompted by a simple question — Had Alibaba used its dominant position in the market to stifle competition? Had the company prevented its merchants from using other similar online e-commerce platforms?

And guess what they found? Alibaba had in fact done precisely that. The company was soon deemed guilty and they were made to pay a whopping $2.8bn in fines for their transgressions — a hefty sum even for the likes of Alibaba. And when you think about this regulatory intervention, you’ll be hard-pressed to argue that this action goes against the ethos of free-market capitalism. If anything, it aids it.

And this isn’t a one-off. Take the case of data privacy. When Didi (China’s Uber) was about to IPO in the US, regulators once again cautioned the company from going ahead with the listing. They weren’t sure if Didi was using foreign equipment or services to store consumer data and they wanted to make sure that US authorities couldn’t expose any vulnerabilities — if they did exist. But when Didi went ahead with the listing anyways, Chinese regulators sprung into action and prevented the company from adding new customers. The app was removed from all digital storefronts as well.

At the time it seemed like the reaction was a bit excessive but it’s hard to argue that it’s not in the country’s best economic interests. Even if it does shave off the company’s valuation in the short term, it will most likely put China in good stead for the future. It’s the same case when they decided to clamp down on online tutoring companies. Chinese authorities weren’t just going after online tutors. They were also doing it to offline institutes, believing that these companies were fuelling anxiety among parents and children alike. Even Chinese users on social media applauded the move.

Now some people will contest that the timing is suspect. After all, tech companies didn’t just crop up last year. They’ve been in business for decades now. Which begs the question — “Why now?”

Well, one argument is that Chinese tech companies have assumed a life of their own and now pose a threat to the very authority — that is the Chinese Communist Party. You could contend that these actions serve a single purpose — to show everyone who’s boss and we think it’s a perfectly reasonable assumption to make about an autocratic regime.

But the other explanation is that the crackdown didn’t really begin last year. About 5–6 years ago, Chinese regulators started clamping down on steel, chemical, and paper plants all across China after a wave of public protests (against polluting companies) began gaining momentum. These were companies that once aided China’s growth and yet Chinese regulators were willing to throw down the gauntlet when people made their displeasure known.

So maybe they’re acting once again because there's increasing pressure from the public to rein in the burgeoning influence of Chinese tech companies. Maybe they’re doing it because they fear the repercussions of not acting.

In any case, that’s just one hypothesis and if you have a different theory explaining why China is going after its own companies, make sure you tweet at us.

Until then….

Don't forget to share this article on WhatsApp, LinkedIn and Twitter






Have a good day ❤️

Checkout Ditto

You can change your preferences here.

No longer interested? You can unsubscribe here.

You are receiving this email because you have subscribed via our website

Our mailing address: Finception, Ideapad, CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad 380015, India


Key phrases

Older messages

The case of the disappearing camel

Wednesday, September 1, 2021

Finshots The case of the disappearing camel In today's Finshots we talk about why the camel population is on the decline. Yes, camel population :) Policy The Story India's camel population is

Why did India invest up to $3Bn in Afghanistan?

Tuesday, August 31, 2021

Finshots Why did India invest up to $3Bn in Afghanistan? In today's Finshots we ask why India would invest massive sums of money in a wartorn country Policy The Story India has made big investments

Fixing the Urban Cooperative Banking system

Monday, August 30, 2021

Finshots Fixing the Urban Cooperative Banking system In today's Finshots we talk about how the RBI is trying to fix the urban cooperative banking system in this country Policy The Story For the

Weekly Wrapup: Water and Gold

Saturday, August 28, 2021

Finshots Weekly Wrapup: Water and Gold In this week's wrapup we talk about Eicher Motors, Gold jewellery, the Asset monetization plan, Global Shipping Crisis and lastly Lebanon's Water Crisis.

How does a country run out of water?

Friday, August 27, 2021

Finshots How does a country run out of water? In today's Finshots we talk about how Lebanon may soon run out of water. Yes! Water. Economy The Story Lebanon is a water-scarce country. As one report

Get ready to pay more

Friday, October 22, 2021

View in browser Bloomberg US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell reiterated on Friday that “it's time to taper,” shorthand for the slow removal of financial supports that held up a once pandemic-

FTT Update: Hailey Bieber Just Invested In Fintech

Friday, October 22, 2021

​ ​ Hi all, Julie here. Excited to hang out with some fintech folks in Austin tonight at Point72 Ventures' happy hour! Jordan is stoked to meet more of you at Money2020 in a few days too. I'm

The Value of Experts

Friday, October 22, 2021

Inside GLG, the World's First "Expert Network" ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Inside the investment craze changing the face of Las Vegas

Friday, October 22, 2021

Big real estate investors known as REITs have been... View in browser INSIDER INSIDER Subscribe Insider Exclusive FINANCE Inside the investment craze changing the face of Las Vegas Big real estate

Asset manager Valkyrie's bitcoin futures ETF will start trading on Friday, reports say

Friday, October 22, 2021

The company's bitcoin futures ETF will start trading in the US on Friday, October 22, rivalling ProShares' own launch earlier this week, reports said. View in browser Business Insider Business

Blimps, Bots, and the Future of Cargo

Friday, October 22, 2021

Plus! Bitcoin's Long March: Pensions; Last Mile; Google's Laffer-Style Tax Cut; Sales ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Fintech News Issue #334

Friday, October 22, 2021

The Other Side of Pandemic See Online Issue #334 2021-10-21 COVID-19 reshaped our financial world. From the way we transact, to our digital knowledge, now it seems like if we can't use cash as we

The Daily StockTips Newsletter 10.22.2021

Friday, October 22, 2021

I've Screened the Market for what I Consider the Best, Safest, & Most RELIABLE Profit Opportunities! (Paid Subscriber Service) ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Blackstone scouts hot tech deals — Deutsche's new office — Las Vegas dealmakers

Friday, October 22, 2021

View in browser Insider Finance Insider Finance Subscribe Hi, and welcome to Insider Finance. This is finance editor Dan DeFrancesco. In case you missed it, the Insider Finance newsletter is going on

[New post] From Pillar 2 to post: is it time for a change in concentration risk methodology?

Friday, October 22, 2021

BankUnderground posted: " Chris Leaney The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a measure of diversification, commonly used as an indicator to calculate banks' credit concentration risk capital