The Deleted Scenes - Engineers, Traffic and Social
A fellow on Twitter who enjoys disagreeing with urbanists wrote this last month: Why does the silly "Induced Demand" narrative persist, despite its conflicting with common sense?
1) Makes people feel smart; "I know something the masses don't know"
2) "More = less" is counterintuitive, making it especially appealing
3) It signals urbanist tribal affiliation “Induced demand” refers to the insight and widely observed phenomenon that widening highways/increasing highway capacity often leads to more traffic, such that travel times and congestion do not improve. In his latest book, Charles Marohn writes that the only way to “fix” or “solve” congestion is to get people out of their cars. In the same vein, it’s often argued that you can’t build your way out of congestion. (I suppose you could, but where would 40 or 50 lanes of highway actually go?) In just one of the iconic examples of induced demand, Houston famously widened its traffic-choked Katy Freeway in the mid-2000s, to more than 20 lanes. Travel times improved in the short term. But by the time several years had gone by, peak traffic was worse than before the widening. This kind of thing can sound unbelievable. For certain conservatives who think of urbanists as car-hating ideologically driven busybodies, it sounds too perfect. But it’s basically true. Now there’s a lot going on here, and much of it has to do with land use rather than any magic property of road capacity to generate traffic. Obviously, if induced demand were some kind of universal phenomenon, no road anywhere would ever have any free capacity. What people are mostly talking about is commuting routes and freeways, where the widening project often encourages peripheral development, which in turn generates more commuting trips. Daniel Herriges at Strong Towns wrote an excellent piece about all of this last August, distilling it very clearly in layman’s terms. He starts like this, which is helpful when you’re addressing people who aren’t already convinced or have simply never heard of this stuff before:
As far as the land-use angle, he writes:
And you can imagine what happens to traffic as these changes in the development pattern play out. Here’s another good piece about this in Governing, by Jake Blumgart. If this interests you, read both pieces in full as well as the one I linked above about Houston’s big freeway. But in this post, I’m less interested in proving induced demand to you than in thinking about the kind of insight that it is. The fellow on Twitter who I showed you at the beginning here is a libertarian or conservative. But in fact, contra his opinion, I think induced demand is a profoundly conservative insight about how human behavior works. At heart, it’s an argument that human behavior is dynamic, not static. People are always evaluating and responding to incentives and making calculations. You can’t fix congestion by building more lanes, because people respond to the reduced time-cost of driving by doing more of it. You can’t hold driving habits or development constant in the real world, because these things interact with each other in ways that we can’t always predict or plan for. What we call “traffic” is much more complex than inputs and outputs—it’s a human, social phenomenon. In other words, induced demand is a sort of argument against social engineering and a warning about unintended consequences. Conservatives are quite familiar with this kind of argument. They often make it in regard to social programs, arguing that welfare weakens families or work ethic or what have you. They warn that it’s not as simple as providing social assistance to people in need, because (they argue) there’s something about those programs being available that can change human behavior in a way that makes those programs more necessary. Or, as the British conservative writer Theodore Dalrymple puts it, in more rarefied language, “misery increases to meet the means available for its alleviation.” I’m not saying this true; just that it’s familiar logic for conservatives. It’s even a more complex question than the observable relationship between freeway widening and congestion. (It also matters, a lot, how exactly social programs work; you can’t simply talk about “welfare” if you’re trying to actually understand how to do social programs well. My understanding is the simpler, the better.) But other than welfare—in fact, almost everywhere—genuine conservatives are cautious, aware of how fragile our current order can be, and humble, even skeptical, in terms of the ability of policy to fix human problems without unintended consequences. Everything we’ve done to cities in the last century, and the way in which we’ve totally oriented our land use around the car, is the sort of massive experiment that conservatives should look askance at. And here, the notion that you could ram 20-lane freeways through cities and out into the countryside without altering many other variables is the kind of technocratic, top-down hubris conservatives warn about. They should be as skeptical of traffic engineers as social engineers. Induced demand—which can sound like some sort of lefty anti-car theory—fundamentally embodies a very conservative way of thinking about the dynamic and unpredictable nature of human behavior. The fact that urbanists do tend to lean left is mostly an accident of American politics and culture war, and it has very little to do with most of what’s being advocated at heart. I’m not sure how many people who write about induced demand think about it the way I just outlined—but the phenomenon speaks for itself. These are not left or right concerns. They’re just human concerns—having a good place to live, having lots of ways to get around, and not wasting hours in traffic. Related Reading: The Housing Crisis is a Policy Problem Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to help support this newsletter. You’ll get a weekend subscribers-only post, plus full access to the archive of over 300 posts and growing. And you’ll help ensure more material like this! You’re a free subscriber to The Deleted Scenes. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. |
Older messages
The Car and Car Dependence
Monday, March 28, 2022
They're not the same, and in some ways opposites
A Good Run
Saturday, March 26, 2022
It's okay for a publication or a business not to live forever
Crossing Into the Supermarket
Wednesday, March 23, 2022
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #50
Where Do They Shop?
Tuesday, March 22, 2022
A look at rural retail
Forty Pages, No Words
Monday, March 21, 2022
Zoning absurdity at its finest in suburban Silver Spring, Maryland
You Might Also Like
The Opposite Of Small Town Blues
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Highways weren't made for people, and classic urban fabric wasn't made for cars ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Starting May 22: Sophus Helle on Gilgamesh
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Join a community of readers around the world for a one-of-a-kind literary course “I see [Gilgamesh] as a composite entity. I see it as a place where all sorts of things, all sorts of voices, all sorts
I learned the difference between a delta squeeze and a gamma squeeze
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
But first: Amazon products that blew our minds — Check out what we Skimm'd for you today May 14, 2024 Subscribe Read in browser But first: Amazon products that blew our minds Update location or
"When The World Falls in Around You or, Vows to My Palestinian Wife on Our Wedding Day" by Lehua Taitano
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
We on the sea cliff all / thrill at December's licking / wind Facebook Twitter Instagram Support Poem-a-Day May 14, 2024 When The World Falls in Around You or, Vows to My Palestinian Wife on Our
Let’s end the technopoly
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Technology is accelerating faster than ever. And it's no longer taking us with it. Technology is leaving us behind as it vaults and skitters into a post-human future. Spasms of electrical circuits,
Dakota Johnson's Airport Pants Are The *Best* Alternative To Sweats
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
A flawless travel look.
How to Create a Portable PC on a USB Drive
Monday, May 13, 2024
TikTok's 'Seed Snailing' Trend Isn't a Gardening Hack. Yes, you can run your very own computer system on a USB drive. Not displaying correctly? View this newsletter online. TODAY'S
Beyoncé Is In Her Booty Shorts Era And I'm Here For It
Monday, May 13, 2024
Plus, Meghan Markle's tribute to Princess Diana, your horoscope for Mon. May 13, & more.
Are We Over Therapy?
Monday, May 13, 2024
What's new today on the Cut — covering style, self, culture, and power, plus interviews, profiles, columns, and commentary from our editors. Brand Logo MONDAY, MAY 13 mental health Maybe You
MIDDI Rewind: How to Shop for … Wall Art
Monday, May 13, 2024
Master the gallery wall with five tips to help you pick the right pieces for your space. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏