The Deleted Scenes - Three Generations of Separated Uses
Three Generations of Separated UsesThe Supreme Court that established zoning, and zoning as "concept creep"Readers: This week marks the one-year anniversary of this newsletter! I’m offering an anniversary discount, in case you’ve been on the fence about upgrading to a paid subscription. Thank you for your support, whether reading, sharing, or subscribing. Here’s to another year of The Deleted Scenes! This got some attention on Twitter last month: Did you know the Supreme Court that in 1926 called apartment buildings "mere parasites" is the exact same court that declared in 1927 "three generations of imbeciles are enough"? The first opiniom found zoning constitutional. The second one forced sterilization. I only just realized this the day I wrote it (please forgive the typo I made tweeting on my phone.) I knew both of these Supreme Court rulings—Buck v. Bell (eugenics) and Euclid v. Ambler (zoning) were in the 1920s, but it had never occurred to me that they were decided by the same set of justices. Interestingly, only one justice dissented from both majority opinions, and that was Pierce Butler, who I can’t say I’ve ever heard of. Oliver Wendell Holmes, who infamously wrote “three generations of imbeciles are enough,” was part of both majorities. Actually, Butler was the only dissenter in Buck v. Bell. Two other justices in addition to Butler dissented from the majority in Euclid. In other words, the Supreme Court of the late 1920s found both of these opinions pretty uncontroversial. The passage from the Euclid decision that refers to apartment buildings as “parasites,” and which conceptually is pretty classist (or even eugenic), is this:
There are so many lines from this through to NIMBYism today: the conflation of people with automobiles or traffic, the notion that apartment buildings are somehow in conflict with “residential” neighborhoods, the arguments about sunlight and views and the need for greenery, with no accounting for the far greater environmental issues caused by low-density sprawl. But there’s something more insidious here. One of the interesting things about zoning is that what it is today, and even what it was by the time of the Euclid decision is related to, but very different, from it was originally conceived to be. The initial genesis of zoning was as a technocratic public health idea, mostly about getting toxic or noxious industrial uses separated from residential areas. When we call zoning “separation of uses,” that’s what we’re referring to, even though modern zoning is far more complicated than that. But very early on, you can see how this technocratic, pretty much objective idea—separating, actual, literal noxious uses or nuisances—was hijacked. You can see how the justices use the notion of “nuisance” conceptually, basically endorsing the idea that poor people and the buildings they live in are nuisances, and giving that opinion a detached, technocratic veneer. A dry public health concept became a condescending, exclusionary, classist ideology. It reminds me, a little, of some of the right-wingers who have been looking askance at talk about public health during the pandemic. They fear that at some point the language of health and safety will stop referring to literal health, but rather become more figurative and thus ideological. Conservative ideas, for example, might be likened to a virus, and perhaps measures will be taken to stop their spread. (Of course, while they might fear that eventuality, many others have already actually experienced such a thing.) Everyone knows that nothing good usually follows the language of parasites and infections when applied to people. Yes, that’s a bit paranoid. But when you look at the concept creep in zoning, and the subtle transformation of objective measures into subjective ones, it should give you pause. It can happen here, and it has happened here. Now, I don’t think we should abolish zoning. I’m sure there’s a lot in the average zoning code that is useful, and you might need codes, of a better sort, to produce better built environments today (for example, the New Urbanists came up with “form-based codes,” which were an attempt to codify some of the old town-building wisdom we had lost by the 1990s.) Much as I write about zoning, it’s ultimately a thicket of legal concepts, and I’m not an expert on all of that. But despite knowing more about this stuff than most people, I had never even heard that the Supreme Court that found zoning constitutional also approved of eugenics. I don’t know what, exactly, the connection is, but it’s unsettling. If anyone knows more or wants to expand on this, leave a comment, send an email! Social card image credit Manitoba Historical Maps/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0 Related Reading: When Small Towns Wanted Tall Buildings You’re a free subscriber to The Deleted Scenes. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. |
Key phrases
Older messages
About That Avocado Toast
Monday, April 4, 2022
Lattes aren't down payments, but...
Calling for the Music
Saturday, April 2, 2022
Thoughts on lost cultural production
New and Old #51
Friday, April 1, 2022
Friday roundup and commentary
Full Metal Spatula
Thursday, March 31, 2022
Does overseas Walmart sell better products?
Locked Up in the Art Studio
Wednesday, March 30, 2022
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #51
You Might Also Like
Can't build muscle? Change your diet, not your workout
Sunday, April 28, 2024
men's health shop logo The Best Meals to Build Muscle View in Browser A no-bullshit 3-week plan for big gains Building muscle is complex. It's about your workout, your nutrition, your hormones,
Chappell Roan is Taking Lesbian Pop to a New Dimension
Sunday, April 28, 2024
For fans, her music is as empowering as it is entertaining ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
30 Movies That Have Definitely Not Aged Well 😬
Sunday, April 28, 2024
4 Ways to Get the Most Out of Your Robot Vacuum. A journey through movies that we're a little embarrassed about. Not displaying correctly? View this newsletter online. TODAY'S FEATURED STORY 30
The Weekly Wrap #159
Sunday, April 28, 2024
04.28.2024 ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Weekend: Zuck’s New Look ⛓
Sunday, April 28, 2024
But first: an actually good grad gift — Check out what we Skimm'd for you today Subscribe Read in browser April 28, 2024 Daily Skimm Header Image Together with apple gift card But first: an
A Reading List for National Poetry Month 2024
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Our partners, sponsors, and advertisers present some of their titles to help celebrate National Poetry Month. View this email in your browser A Reading List for National Poetry Month 2024 Our 2024
Week Ahead Tarot Reading from 4/29 to 5/6 2024
Sunday, April 28, 2024
You will want to stay on task this week. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Inside the chaos response to Meghan Markle’s jampire
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Let her eat cake, and sell jam, and towels, and a cooking show, and…
6-Second Sunday: On rituals, doctor damage, and hard beds
Sunday, April 28, 2024
6 Ideas. 6 Second Skim. 6 Minute Read. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
RI#221 - What AI can do today/Multilingue/Computer maintenance
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Hello people ! I'm Alex, the author of the Rabbit Ideas Newsletter. Every week I find useful resources online and share them with you. Let's check this week's links! 🌐 Websites * What AI