Popular Information - Political blackmail
Last week, Popular Information published an internal email from the non-profit of right-wing billionaire Charles Koch. This email revealed the truth about the Koch group's position on Ukraine and Russia. It also revealed an unseemly connection between Koch's non-profit and his for-profit corporation, Koch Industries. Since then, I've been subject to a barrage of attacks online. I've been called "deplorable," "lazy," "dishonest," and worse. One thing the people making these attacks have in common? Their employers all receive funding from Koch. You can help us fight back — and intensify our efforts to uncover the truth about Koch and other powerful figures — with a paid subscription. We don't have a paywall because we don't want money to stand in the way of the truth. But, to maintain our independence, we also don't accept advertising. So if you can afford $6/month or $50/year please sign up today and support this work. Republicans in Florida and Washington, DC are vowing to seek retribution against Disney for belatedly opposing Florida's "Parental Rights in Education" legislation, also known as the "Don't Say Gay" bill. The bill prohibits "instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3." This means teachers who acknowledge that some children have same-sex parents could subject their school to litigation. These elected officials say they will use state power to punish Disney for expressing political views that diverge from their own. The politicians issuing these threats say they are justified because Disney has engaged in "woke corporate actions." Even if this were true, it is an abuse of power for elected officials to penalize corporations for failing to support a particular social agenda. But it is not true. Disney is not "woke." Just a month ago, Disney CEO Bob Chapek sent a memo to Disney staff explaining why the company would not issue "a public statement condemning" the "Don't Say Gay" bill. Chapek argued that "corporate statements do very little to change outcomes or minds." And he said he was concerned that a statement from Disney would be "counterproductive and undermine more effective ways to achieve change." Chapek said the "Don't Say Gay" bill was just "one bill" in "one state" and Disney should focus on creating "inspiring content." Chapek also acknowledged that Disney had made donations to supporters of the legislation ($300,000 since 2020) but only promised to "review" its criteria for political contributions. Critically, that is all Disney said until after the Florida Senate passed the "Don't Say Gay" bill by a narrow 3-vote margin, 22 to 17, on March 8. Had Disney, one of the most powerful forces in Florida politics, publicly opposed the legislation prior to the vote, it may have turned out differently. Instead, the bill went to the desk of Governor Ron DeSantis (R), a strong supporter of the legislation. On March 9, Chapek announced that Disney was "opposed to the bill from the outset" but "chose not to take a public position on it because we thought we could be more effective working behind-the-scenes." Facing protests from Disney employees and customers, however, Chapek said he called "DeSantis this morning to express our disappointment and concern that if the legislation becomes law." But it was already much too late. DeSantis made clear that he would be signing the bill imminently. On March 11, Chapek issued another statement saying the company would pause all political donations in Florida and work to "combat similar legislation in other states." Many states have introduced similar anti-LGBTQ legislation but Disney has refused to weigh in on specific legislation, even in states where Disney has a large presence. Instead, it has posted general statements on social media. DeSantis signed the legislation on March 28. Disney issued a statement in response saying that it would work to have "law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts." Repeal is fanciful and it is unclear what, if anything Disney has done to support litigation against the law. But Republican officials at the state and national level are still seeking revenge against Disney. Florida blackmailSince 1967, Florida has granted Disney unusual autonomy in the area surrounding Walt Disney World, known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District. Within this area, the company can provide emergency services and even levy taxes. It's an open question whether Disney should have these powers. But DeSantis and other politicians are threatening to repeal the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act for belatedly opposing their efforts to stigmatize LGBTQ students in Florida schools. In a March 31 press conference, DeSantis said that Disney's opposition to the "Don't Say Gay" legislation had "alienated a lot of people." As a result, the company's "political influence… has dissipated." DeSantis said he would now support the repeal of any "special privileges in law" granted to Disney. Florida Representative Spencer Roach (R) said on March 30 that he was meeting with "fellow legislators to discuss a repeal of the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act." Roach was very clear about his motivations. "If Disney wants to embrace woke ideology, it seems fitting that they should be regulated by Orange County," Roach said. Yesterday was the 2nd meeting in a week w/fellow legislators to discuss a repeal of the 1967 Reedy Creek Improvement Act, which allows Disney to act as its own government. If Disney wants to embrace woke ideology, it seems fitting that they should be regulated by Orange County. Congressional blackmailOn April 7, Congressman Jim Banks (R-IN) and 16 other members of Congress, wrote to Chapek and told them they would not support an extension of the copyright for Mickey Mouse. Without Congressional action, the copyright for Disney's iconic mascot will expire in January 2024. Whether copyrights should be repeatedly extended is debatable. But the letter from 17 elected officials makes clear their opposition is not grounded in their views of copyright policy. Rather, they say they oppose the copyright extension because of Disney's "public opposition to Florida's Parental Rights in Education Act." The members of Congress that signed the letter also make clear that the new Florida law is part of a broader agenda to erase LGBTQ people and other diverse identities. The authors of the letter object to Disney's plans to include more LGBTQ characters in the company's stories and an alleged increase in the number of staff that work in Disney's Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion department. They say all this is proof that Disney is "purposefully influencing small children with their political and sexual agenda." Banks expanded on his views during a recent appearance on Fox News' Laura Ingraham:
This objection, however, appears limited to circumstances when corporations oppose policies that Banks and other Republicans support. When Disney and hundreds of other companies spent millions through the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to defeat the Build Back Better proposal, Banks raised no objections. A strategy of deterrenceDeSantis, Banks, and others are not threatening Disney because Disney has taken effective action against Florida's legislation to stigmatize LGBTQ people. Rather, they are seeking to gain leverage over Disney to deter them from taking steps that could make a difference. What would effective action look like? In 2016, both houses of the Georgia legislature passed a law that would have allowed some businesses to deny services to LGBTQ people. Disney's CEO at the time, Bob Iger, said the company would no longer film movies in the state if it was signed into law. "Disney and Marvel are inclusive companies, and although we have had great experiences filming in Georgia, we will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law," the company said. Georgia's Governor in 2016, Nathan Deal (R), vetoed the legislation. |
Key phrases
Older messages
EXCLUSIVE: Koch group says U.S. should deliver partial "victory" to Russia in Ukraine
Friday, April 8, 2022
In an internal email obtained exclusively by Popular Information, Stand Together, the influential non-profit group run by right-wing billionaire Charles Koch, argues that the United States should seek
Tennessee Republicans pushing to undermine same-sex marriage are backed by major corporations
Thursday, April 7, 2022
A group of 24 Tennessee Republicans that introduced a bill to undermine same-sex marriage rights are financially backed by prominent corporations who publicly champion LGBTQ rights — including Amazon,
EXCLUSIVE: Koch group says U.S. should deliver partial "victory" to Russia in Ukraine
Wednesday, April 6, 2022
In an internal email obtained exclusively by Popular Information, Stand Together, the influential non-profit group run by right-wing billionaire Charles Koch, argues that the United States should seek
AT&T shareholders fight back
Tuesday, April 5, 2022
Popular Information has repeatedly documented how AT&T's political spending conflicts with the company's stated values. For example, AT&T publicly claims to be an ardent supporter of
New York is on the brink of historic climate action. One man stands in the way.
Monday, April 4, 2022
Most people think of cars and power plants as significant sources of greenhouse gas emissions. So if the world wants to combat climate change, we need to clean up transportation and power generation.
You Might Also Like
After lobbying from Uber and DoorDash, new proposal could overhaul minimum wage law
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Microsoft's headquarters campuses connected by new pedestrian bridge ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Science Firsthand: Learn how Bristol Myers Squibb unlocked the potential of CAR T cell
☕ Inside pitch
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Palantir's AI pitch to advertisers. April 23, 2024 Marketing Brew PRESENTED BY Slack It's Tuesday. And it might not be a great week to be an EV marketer. Just under a year after CEO Elon Musk
☕ Buy the month
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
August's co-founder on running a mission-based business. April 23, 2024 Retail Brew It's Tuesday, and the week is already heavy on industry intrigue. Lululemon announced layoffs. Nordstrom is
A Burlesque Family at Home
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Design editor Wendy Goodman takes you inside the city's most exciting homes and design studios. Design Hunting A visual diary by Design Editor Wendy Goodman A Burlesque Family at Home Showbiz
Congress reauthorizes the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Plus, a reader asks about Tangle's diversity guidelines for hiring. Congress reauthorizes the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act By Isaac Saul • 23 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser A
Finding Passion
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Stay open-eared and open-eyed Finding Passion By Kaamya Sharma • 23 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser The Trouble With Passion Tyler Burgese & Erin Cech | Culture Study | 21st April 2024 Why
Keeping the CEO in the family
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
+ how you eat affects generations
⚡️ Apple Has Lost Control of the iPhone
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Plus: 'Deadpool & Wolverine' just rebooted Logan's canon all over again.
The Pentagon’s 30-Year Lobbying Swindle
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
For decades, corporations have used taxpayer-funded fellowship opportunities to help them secure billion-dollar defense contracts. For decades, the Defense Department has used taxpayer money to send
Can Canada stave off populism?
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Plus: News from space, updates from a busy week at the Supreme Court, and more. April 23, 2024 View in browser Good morning! Our friends over at Today, Explained (the podcast) spoke with Canadian Prime