Popular Information - CVS' diabetes scheme
In just a few weeks, Elon Musk has inflicted serious damage on Twitter — pushing conspiracy theories, alienating advertisers, and firing thousands of employees. This is bad news for Popular Information. On April 13, 2021, CVS, the nation's largest drug store chain, entered into a "Corporate Sponsorship Agreement" with the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Under the terms of the agreement, the ADA agreed "to identify and acknowledge [CVS] as a supporter of the organization and the diabetes cause." Further, the agreement provided CVS with a license "to use the ADA Marks, solely to identify Company as a supporter of the ADA." The agreement contains numerous pages laying out in detail how the ADA should recognize CVS. For example, the ADA must produce an "integrated marketing campaign… for 4 weeks each year recognizing Company’s support." During American Diabetes Month, CVS "will be included on [the] ADA campaign webpage, toolkit materials and communications." This agreement has significant commercial value for CVS. People with serious medical conditions like diabetes require a lot of prescription medication and medical supplies. These are lucrative customers for a company like CVS. Associating CVS with the ADA, which is highly regarded among people affected by diabetes, will likely make those people more likely to shop at CVS. In exchange, CVS agreed to donate at least $10 million to the ADA over three years. CVS is a large corporation with billions in profits and could have simply donated that amount to the ADA. To put it into perspective, since CVS signed the agreement, the company has brought in $395 billion in revenue. $10 million represents 0.002% of CVS' revenue from June 2021 to September 2022. Instead, the agreement provides a mechanism for CVS to offset its obligation to the ADA "through in-store fundraising and cause marketing." Each year CVS will turn over whatever is donated by customers. Then, at the end of the agreement, CVS will pay "an amount equal to the difference between the total funds raised and $10,000,000." Initially, CVS was required to turn over any amount in excess of $10 million to the ADA. But, in a last-minute amendment to the agreement, dated October 28, 2021, CVS was permitted to "direct any funds raised in excess of $10,000,000 over the Term of the Agreement to support other initiatives at the Company’s discretion" as long as those initiatives "advance the ADA’s mission." On November 2, 2021, CVS publicly announced its $10 million commitment to the ADA. "CVS Health has committed $10 million over three years [to the ADA] to support people in preventing and managing diabetes with increased awareness, knowledge, and action to improve health," the press release stated. CVS also mentioned it would solicit donations from customers, but suggested those donations would provide additional support for the ADA:
After CVS customers scanned their merchandise, they were presented with this message, giving them the option to donate various amounts to the ADA. A customer that tapped "Donation $1.00" likely believed that their choice meant the ADA would have an additional dollar it could use to support its mission. In fact, that dollar simply reduced CVS' obligation to the ADA at the conclusion of their corporate sponsorship agreement. Rather than supporting the ADA, the customer was subsidizing CVS' operations. CVS did not respond to Popular Information's request for comment. CVS' legal troubles beginIn May 2022, Kevin McCabe — a CVS customer who believed he donated to the ADA at checkout — filed a class action lawsuit against the company. McCabe alleges that CVS "defrauded its customers" by representing that donations would benefit the ADA when the donations actually benefit CVS. The lawsuit, which was amended in September 2022, asserts that the checkout message about the ADA donations was "false, deceptive, and misleading" and "the Checkout Message was material and was the only disclosure that CVS made to Customers regarding the Campaign." The lawsuit also claims that "CVS issued false, deceptive, and misleading receipts to Customers who made a Campaign Donation" because the receipts said customer donations are "100% tax deductible." The lawsuit alleges that monies that reduced CVS' existing obligations to the ADA are not tax deductible. On November 11, 2022, CVS filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. CVS' motion to dismiss does not dispute the terms of the agreement with the ADA. Rather, it describes them in a slightly more favorable light:
This, of course, was not the story told to customers. CVS customers were not told that their donations would offset CVS' $10 million obligation to the ADA at the conclusion of the agreement. Nor did they know that CVS agreed to that obligation in exchange for the use of ADA marks and promotion by the ADA. CVS focuses on whether its conduct meets the technical legal definitions of fraud. Specifically, CVS' attorneys insist that CVS had "no debt" to the ADA and, therefore, its customers could not have been tricked into paying its debt. CVS instead describes the agreement as an "obligation" to the ADA, which "is conditional, and does not arise unless there is a Potential Shortfall." Whether there is a shortfall "cannot be determined until December 31, 2023, at the earliest; and even then, the agreement gives CVS four additional months to solicit additional donations to cover the Potential Shortfall." The motion to dismiss says that "alleged failure to disclose an obligation to donate that does not currently exist – and likely may never exist – cannot sustain a claim for fraud." Whether or not this defense holds up in court is uncertain. CVS' motion to dismiss, and the plaintiff's opposition to that motion, is currently under consideration by the court. But, without a doubt, many CVS customers believe they were providing additional dollars to the ADA that the organization otherwise would not receive. That isn't true. What counts as newsThe lawsuit alleges that CVS customers may have been defrauded out of millions of dollars. But the case has received scant coverage. A couple of legal trade publications covered the case after it was first filed in May. More recently, a few general interest publications picked up the story after it was highlighted in a viral tweet. But most major outlets have a strong bias towards amplifying so-called property crimes committed by regular people instead of corporate misconduct. Companies like CVS are typically presented as victims, not perpetrators. Two weeks ago, for example, the Boston Globe published a story on how retailers like CVS are locking up everyday products like deodorant, stating that it was a “testament to a rise in theft.” In the piece, the author notes that CVS had experienced “a 300 percent increase in retail theft since the start of the pandemic.". Prior to this, the Globe ran a story on increased police presence in a part of Boston, where they feature an expert who claims that “the only crime that's up this year [in Boston] is retail theft.” And the Globe isn’t the only one. Other major outlets are also providing extensive coverage on retail theft. In the last six months, the Philadelphia Inquirer published a piece on how “retail theft is on the rise” and cited CVS Health’s director of organized retail crime and corporate investigations on how “retail theft at CVS stores had tripled since the pandemic began;” NBCNews ran a story on how retailers like CVS employ investigators to secretly follow people they suspect are “part of a shoplifting enterprise;” and ABC wrote a story about a man, who was formerly accused of stealing from Walgreens, shoplifting at CVS. Police claim they "can document up to $15,000 worth of items being stolen." Axios, citing a CVS spokesman, declared shoplifting a "crisis." The volume of news reports on retail theft, however, isn't justified by the data. According to the FBI’s crime data explorer, the number of reported shoplifting offenses dropped 46 percent between 2019 and 2021. “This contradictory data hasn’t stopped big retail chains and their law enforcement allies from pushing the theft-surge narrative,” The Appeal wrote last year. “Stories about shoplifting are generally sourced from major retailers themselves.” Popular Information does not accept advertising from fossil fuel companies, tobacco companies, or anyone else. This newsletter is not financially tied to powerful corporations. We hold powerful corporations accountable. Instead, we rely exclusively on backing from our readers. You can support this work by upgrading to a paid subscription for $6/month or $50/year. |
Key phrases
Older messages
Sponsoring misinformation
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
In October, Popular Information reported that Semafor — a high-profile new media company — launched a climate newsletter sponsored by Chevron. Chevron is not only one of the world's largest
Buying the competition
Monday, December 5, 2022
Over the last year, prices for groceries are up 13%. Meanwhile, the price of food at restaurants has increased more slowly at 8.5%. Why? Restaurants are a highly-competitive industry. The grocery
The future of Popular Information
Friday, December 2, 2022
In just a few weeks, Elon Musk has inflicted serious damage on Twitter — pushing conspiracy theories, alienating advertisers, and firing thousands of employees. This is bad news for Popular Information
SBF's political scam
Thursday, December 1, 2022
Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, better known as SBF, burst onto the political scene and cast himself as the financial savior of the Democratic Party. In May, SBF said he was prepared to spend up to
UPDATE: A vote for paid sick leave gets fast-tracked
Wednesday, November 30, 2022
The nation's 115000 rail workers currently receive no paid sick leave. Major railroad companies could provide every worker with a week of paid sick leave for $321 million — less than 2% of their
You Might Also Like
☕ Deputized
Monday, April 29, 2024
Are AI agents the next big thing? April 29, 2024 Tech Brew PRESENTED BY EnergyX It's Monday. Everyone in the AI world is abuzz about agents, which are more than just mere chatbots—they're
The Great Unknown About Conflicts Of Interest In Arizona’s Abortion Ban
Monday, April 29, 2024
As state supreme courts consolidate power and corporate money, shoddy oversight allows justices to hide their financial conflicts of interest from the public. A powerful anti-abortion group wined and
Campus Arrests, Deadly Storms, and the Year's Best Space Photos
Monday, April 29, 2024
Facts, without motives.
When AI hallucinates poison
Monday, April 29, 2024
Plus: Have we reached peak emission? Examining food delivery app fees. And more. April 29, 2024 View in browser Welcome back! If you've recently tried to buy a book online and thrown up your hands
Why millions of Americans may lose internet access tomorrow
Monday, April 29, 2024
In 2024, reliable access to high-speed internet is no longer a luxury; it is a basic necessity. From job applications to managing personal finances and completing school work, internet access is an
Numlock News: April 29, 2024 • Manga, Challengers, Mauritius
Monday, April 29, 2024
By Walt Hickey Three's A Crowd Challengers, the Zendaya-starring Luca Guadagnino movie about three people who play literal and metaphorical tennis, made $15 million this past weekend, the second-
☕ Snoafers
Monday, April 29, 2024
A chips boom is coming to the US... April 29, 2024 View Online | Sign Up | Shop Morning Brew PRESENTED BY Timeline Nutrition Good morning. Alabama safety Jaylen Key was selected by the New York Jets as
UK's Investigatory Powers Bill to become law despite tech world opposition [Mon Apr 29 2024]
Monday, April 29, 2024
Hi The Register Subscriber | Log in The Register {* Daily Headlines *} 29 April 2024 secret agent eavesdrops using headphones plugged into an audio centre mounted with tape reels (illustration)
'Stop apologizing and do something, Portugal'
Monday, April 29, 2024
what happened last week in Asia, Africa and the Americas Hey, this is Sham, your very own news curator. I have a quick survey prepared, so you can tell me in my face what you like and don't like
QAnon Was Born Out of the Sex Ad Moral Panic That Took Down Backpage.com
Sunday, April 28, 2024
For years, the political establishment opportunistically railed against sex trafficking. Then came Pizzagate. Most Read QAnon Was Born Out of the Sex Ad Moral Panic That Took Down Backpage.com Trevor