SCOTUS Set to Weigh In On Racial Gerrymandering in Alabama
Battleground is a reader-supported publication. Consider supporting the newsletter through Buy Me A Coffee. SCOTUS Set to Weigh In On Racial Gerrymandering in AlabamaAnd this is just one of many cases to come...Merrill v. Milligan: The BasicsRepublicans in Alabama drew a map that packed most of Alabama’s Black population into a single district. That map was quickly challenged in court for racial gerrymandering: a federal court struck down Alabama’s new congressional districts and agreed that the new boundaries gave Black voters too few opportunities to elect a candidate of their choice. The court explicitly demanded that any acceptable alternatives “will need to include two districts in which Black voters either comprise a voting-age majority or something quite close to it.” This demand is pertinent due to the state’s historical, human geography. African Americans makeup 27% of Alabama’s population. Accurate representation would mean that Black voters would have electoral control of two House seats in a seven-seat state. (2/7 = 28%, an almost perfect match to the size of the state’s current Black population). This population is also concentrated in the center of the state, meaning that there are several ways mapmakers could have created two compact, majority Black districts without having to split counties or stretch boundaries in odd ways to capture enough Black voters. Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall appealed the federal court decision to the US Supreme Court in hopes that the nation’s highest court will let the map stand as is. SCOTUS decided to take up the case and put a stay on the lower court’s ruling. This meant that Alabamans were forced to vote within potentially gerrymandered districts for the 2022 election. How Might SCOTUS Rule?SCOTUS could strike down the map…If SCOTUS followed established precedent, justices would simply strike down the map for racial gerrymandering as plaintiffs have provided adequate evidence as outlined in previous gerrymandering cases. Thornburg v. Gingles provides the modern contours for litigating racial gerrymandering cases in federal court. That decision outlined that plaintiffs must provide evidence that not only shows that a fairer map is possible (shown above) they also must prove that the state has a “history of official discrimination” or “whether political campaigns have been characterized by overt or subtle racial appeals.” (And we’re taking about Alabama, both are pretty easy to substantiate in court.) But today’s SCOTUS is one that has ignored established precedent to advance conservative ideology. As a result, most don’t expect Black Alabama voters to be delivered justice. Instead, voting rights advocates are bracing for the worst… SCOTUS could neuter Sec. 2 of the Voting Rights Act…The nightmare scenario is that SCOTUS takes aim at the Voting Rights Act, specifically Section 2 which definitively prohibits the “denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color.” In their defense, the state of Alabama boldly claims that the Voting Rights Act “does not apply to challenges to single-member districts.” While SCOTUS is unlikely to accept this argument as this would eliminate the applicability of the Voting Rights Act altogether, justices did signal their openness to a different line of argument that results in the same effect. Elsewhere in their argument, lawyers representing the state of Alabama try to play a game of “gotcha” with plaintiffs by attempting to use Gingles against them:
Their argument is that if Gingles says that race can’t be a predominate factor in drawing districts, then those alternative districts shown above are invalid because race was the predominate factor in their creation. To voting rights advocates this is an idiotic line of thinking: we’re being told to remedy racial discrimination with our eyes closed. While “race-blind” approaches to racial discrimination have been repeatedly shown to be ineffective, this is the exact kind of conservative fantasy that could be catnip to conservative SCOTUS justices. Although during arguments, justices have been signalling their want for a more limited decision that lets Alabama’s map stand without dramatically challenging or changing existing laws. SCOTUS could just establish itself as kingmaker...The fact that SCOTUS reinstated Alabama’s map for the 2022 elections shows their hand a little bit, almost no one seriously expects justices to strike down the map. (Reinstating a gerrymandered map just before an election only to strike it down afterwards only further erodes SCOTUS’s legitimacy.) However, in their questioning, many have noticed that justices seem to be searching for circumstantial evidence that would allow them to rule on Alabama’s map without touching the Voting Rights Act or redistricting law more broadly. Not only would this deliver conservatives’ desired outcome of upholding the map, it would also allow SCOTUS continued control as more gerrymandering cases are set to arrive. Both Louisiana and South Carolina have outstanding racial gerrymandering cases that may or may not be affected by the decision on Alabama. A narrow decision on Merrill v. Milligan would allow this conservative court to both continue its tradition of legislating from the bench while keeping an iron-grip over its authority on redistricting matters. More From Battleground on Gerrymandering
|
Key phrases
Older messages
Sen. Tuberville on the U.S. Military's White Supremacy Problem: 🤷
Monday, May 15, 2023
Despite decades of research and increasing warnings from within the military, the senator believes it's all just hot air from Democrats.
Conservatives Want to End No-Fault Divorce, They Might Start In Louisiana
Monday, May 8, 2023
...and a pair of ex-Democrats just gave them the power to do so.
Don't Call Michigan a Blue State (yet)
Monday, May 1, 2023
Straight from the governor's mouth.
A Brief Spring Recess (+ a milestone!)
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Battleground will be back in May!
When Gerrymanders Attack
Monday, April 10, 2023
Many recent political controversies stem from undue power derived via gerrymandering. Learn how abuse in redistricting is often a precursor to increased extremism and illegal activity.
You Might Also Like
Guest Newsletter: Five Books
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Five Books features in-depth author interviews recommending five books on a theme Guest Newsletter: Five Books By Sylvia Bishop • 28 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser Five Books features in-
GeekWire's Most-Read Stories of the Week
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Catch up on the top tech stories from this past week. Here are the headlines that people have been reading on GeekWire. ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Science Firsthand: Learn how Bristol
🍿 The Hardy Boys on Acid
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Plus: 'The Lord of the Rings' Extended Cut is returning to theaters.
10 Things That Delighted Us: From Cardboard Bed Frames to Compact Makeup Stacks
Sunday, April 28, 2024
The most useful, thoughtful, and just plain fun things we uncovered this week. The Strategist Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may
LEVER WEEKLY: Pentagon Grifts And Zombie Pipelines
Sunday, April 28, 2024
From insurance meltdowns and zombie pipelines to Pentagon grifts, here's all the news from The Lever this week. LEVER WEEKLY: Pentagon Grifts And Zombie Pipelines By The Lever • 28 Apr 2024 View in
Birds
Sunday, April 28, 2024
So hot right now ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
An urgent deadline is looming, and we’re short
Sunday, April 28, 2024
No donation is too large or too small. If there's one thing we've learned in the decade since The Intercept was founded, it's this: When you're taking on the biggest and most powerful
☕ 24/7
Sunday, April 28, 2024
Should the stock market be open 24 hours? Presented by ZitSticka April 28, 2024 | View Online | Sign Up | Shop The Spiral Bookstore in Guangzhou, China. John Ricky/Anadolu via Getty Images BROWSING
Open Thread 327
Sunday, April 28, 2024
... ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
‘The Everything War’: Inside Amazon with author and WSJ reporter Dana Mattioli
Saturday, April 27, 2024
High school students lead AI edtech startup | New climate-focused fund raises $5M ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Science Firsthand: Learn how Bristol Myers Squibb unlocked the potential of CAR