The Deleted Scenes - Won't You Be My Agent? (Or Maybe Not.)
Won't You Be My Agent? (Or Maybe Not.)Thoughts on the house search, homebuying process, and the housing crisisI’ve written a bit here about looking for and buying a house in Northern Virginia. But I haven’t yet done a full piece on it, of the sort I kept saying I would do during our search. “I have to write about this!” I kept saying, as I discovered the indignities of the process—being told it’s okay if some appliances are broken because you’re going to rip out and remodel the kitchen anyway, for example—and the shocking lack of attention to the condition of $800,000 houses—finding, for example, a broken (haunted?) soft-touch drawer that pulled shut and slammed all on its own. Sometimes, however, it was fun. Like many house-searching couples, we window-shopped well above our price range. Perhaps nowhere else than Northern Virginia or California can someone under 30 walk into a $2.5 million house in sweatpants and a t-shirt and be taken seriously as a customer. Oh—in that $2.5 million house: And a few more things in one nearly $800,000 house that sold in just a couple of days for more than $30,000 over the asking price: I inventoried all of these little anecdotes throughout our search, so I will just give them to you here in one place. But first, one important bit. There is a standard contract that virtually all Northern Virginia realtors will ask you to sign, possibly just to tour houses with them, but definitely to submit offers with them. It is a creation of the Northern Virginia Association of Realtors, and is a mix of bits and pieces of housing law along with clauses which are written by and protect the industry. Some realtors will tell you the contract is required by law, which is not strictly true (I spoke to a lawyer). Among other things, it protects the realtor from a sale behind their back very broadly: as written, the buyer would owe their former realtor a commission on a house sale, even after expiration of the contract. Even—as generally filled in, in a crucial blank pace—on a sale in another state. Everyone will tell you it does not really mean this. And it probably doesn’t, really. But do you want to be the guy who tests it in court? This is often filled in simply as “property” or “residential real-estate.” Realtors are fine limiting it to “Real estate in Northern Virginia,” but will resist limiting it to specific addresses of specific homes. Which means you would technically owe your realtor a commission on a home they never showed you. Also this: The realtor will fill in 30-90 days in that blank above, and will often just put generic “property” in that “Purpose” clause. As written, it’s very hostile to the customer. If you try to get them to alter these blanks very much, you’ll get a runaround. The gist of it is “There’s no reason to limit it because it isn’t bad for you/doesn’t really mean anything.” I dunno—I don’t like signing things that don’t mean anything. And now, the litany of indignities.
Having gone through this process, I can completely understand why “realtors bad, real-estate bad, builders bad, developers bad” is the default position of a lot of people regarding all of this. It’s true, of course, that the house they live in was built by a developer (most likely), sold by a realtor, etc. But that feels abstract compared to being ripped off and rushed through the most consequential purchase of your life. The awfulness of the process, and its seeming inability to be reformed, can reinforce the attitude of “screw you, I got mine.” Certainly, many people come away with a poor impression of the honesty and professionalism of the real-estate industry and its related industries (home inspectors, title agents, etc.). And it is intuitive to think of the pro-housing cause as a special interest of realtors or builders. But most of what’s bad about buying a house is buying a house in a hot market. And the market is hot in large part because we don’t build enough. This is the key thing I’ve come to understand, and which is really not obvious to a layman simply trying to find a place to live. It’s interesting: things that are accidental elements of the market come to feel like inherent characteristics—and we respond to these accidents with more of the very things that give rise to them. Let’s not build anything, that’ll show those greedy developers!” The thing is, this is almost certainly what I would have come away thinking from the homebuying process were I not also following housing and development issues. In fact, my being a housing advocate and observer of land use issues helped us in our process. People told us: Wait to buy, the prices will come down. It’s a bubble. When interest rates go up, prices go down—it’s a law of economics. It turned out none of those things were really true, at least here in the D.C.-area housing market. Prices have barely budged; houses still sell quickly over asking; interest rates are now higher. In effect, prices have continued to climb. I knew this would happen because of what I know about housing, land use, and development here. I know that whatever manipulation and dishonesty there is arises out of a constrained supply of housing. People who did not understand that predicted things that did not happen. They believe, rather, that real estate is a cartel, and that the prices are basically fake. That housing is like diamonds and housing prices are like De Beers marketing. To the extent that this is true, it arises out of a constrained market in the first place. Buying a house in this market and this region, and having correctly predicted how inelastic its high prices would be, has only made me more convinced that we need to build a hell of a lot more. Related Reading: New Construction Blues, Northern Virginia Edition The Thanksgiving Table and the Settlement Table Thank you for reading! Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to help support this newsletter. You’ll get a weekly subscribers-only post, plus full access to the archive: over 600 posts and growing. And you’ll help ensure more material like this! You're currently a free subscriber to The Deleted Scenes. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |
Older messages
Strip Down
Saturday, June 3, 2023
We don't talk about cities in America
New and Old #112
Friday, June 2, 2023
Friday roundup and commentary
Restaurants and Urbanism
Thursday, June 1, 2023
Thoughts on "urban" energy without the form
Airport Reading
Wednesday, May 31, 2023
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #112
Which Housing Is "Housing Crisis Housing"?
Tuesday, May 30, 2023
Remembering that some small communities grow on their own terms
You Might Also Like
Where are you now?
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Where do you want to be? ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
WIN $2,500 to put toward your very own warm weather getaway!
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Warm Weather Getaways Sweepstakes
Tinee, But Part Of The Story
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
What Do You Think You're Looking At? #197 ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
treehouse
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
on endings ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Why Didn't Voters Care About Biden's Many Accomplishments?
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Biden did a lof of really important things, yet the public never gave him any credit. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
What I’m Re-Reading, No.1
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
On Arendt, Céline, Juvenilia Studies ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Duck face walked so this pout could run
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
— Check out what we Skimm'd for you today January 15, 2025 Subscribe Read in browser Header Image But First: Did Travis spill some Taylor tea? Update location or View forecast Quote of the Day
“Centaur over Tomer Butte” by Robert Wrigley
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Tomer Butte, named for George Washington Tomer, January 15, 2025 donate Centaur over Tomer Butte Robert Wrigley Tomer Butte, named for George Washington Tomer, who arrived in 1871 to formalize its
#66: What The Notches Said – No. 06
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Interview with 'Z', who's from my səxual past ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
Katie Holmes’ Monochrome Outfit Debuts Winter’s New *It* Color
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
We're major fans. The Zoe Report Daily The Zoe Report 1.14.2025 Katie Holmes' Monochrome Outfit Debuts Winter's New *It* Color (Celebrity) Katie Holmes' Monochrome Outfit Debuts