View this email online

Ten Econ Takeaways From Trump and Harris

by Darian Woods

For this edition of the Planet Money newsletter, we’re turning it over to Indicator co-host Darian Woods, who recently reported on the economic platforms of the two main presidential candidates.

In a recent two-part series on The Indicator, I reported on the economic platforms of presidential candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. I learned a lot, and we thought it might be informative to distill what I learned into a top ten list. Here you go:

1) Trump is tapping into a vein of deep anger about the U.S. economy, which is voters' number one issue.

2) Trump's proposed tariffs would be very costly. The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates they'd add at least $2,600 in annual expenses for the typical US household. The study's authors reckon this is, if anything, an underestimate.

3) There's scant evidence American-born workers would be better off financially if Trump delivers his promise for mass deportations. The National Academy of Sciences brought in immigration researchers to review the literature. They concluded immigration overall has a positive impact on long-run economic growth in the U.S.

4) Reforming the regulatory system is a priority for the left and right alike. Trump talks about cutting red tape more.

Saul Loeb/Getty Images

5) Increasing the child tax credit is also a bipartisan cause. Harris made raising the CTC to $6,000 for the first year of newborns the centerpiece of her economic agenda.

6) Harris' plan to raise corporate taxes to 28% would likely reduce companies' capital investments, but its effects on economic growth are surprisingly unclear.

7) Taxing unrealised capital gains for people with over $100 million in wealth is uncharted territory. Very few countries do this.

8) On housing, Harris is proposing both demand- and supply-based policies to help families own their own home. But actually building houses will be the harder one. The $25,000 first-home credit, without increased building, would just be eaten up by higher home prices.

9) Most economists hate Harris' anti-price-gouging policy. Anti-price-gouging laws are already in place in many states, and have been used in fairly limited situations like the pandemic.

10) Neither candidate offers serious plans for reducing the federal debt. According to four think tanks, over 10 years, Trump's plans would increase the deficit by $3.6 billion to $6.6 trillion, while Harris' plan would increase the federal deficit less, but still at a sizable $400 billion to $1.4 trillion.

For more, check out our recent episodes on The Indicator: here and here.

Thanks to guests Oren Cass, Veronique de Rugy, and Kathryn Anne Edwards, as well as to Mary E. Lovely and Kimberly Clausing for their analysis.

Not subscribed? Subscribe to this newsletter.

Want to send this to others? Share the web-version of this newsletter on social media.

Want more Planet Money? Listen to our podcasts.

Newsletter continues after sponsor message

Get Bonus Content

Subscribe to Planet Money+ for bonus episodes with behind the scenes takes, extended interviews, and extra facts we couldn’t fit into the main show. Plus, it’s ad free. You’ll get The Indicator and Planet Money Summer School too - all while supporting our nerdy, ambitious journalism. Learn more at Plus.npr.org/PlanetMoney.

On Our Podcasts

What's THAT got to do with economics? — "Wanna see a trick? Give us any topic and we can tie it back to the economy." Listen here

Inside the economic minds of the VP candidates — Next week, JD Vance and Tim Walz will face off in the only confirmed vice presidential debate ahead of the election. As voters look ahead to what their economic policies might be, we look back to see what they have said and done, and how it turned out. Listen here

America's small GDP bump, China's big stimulus dispersal, and a Monkey King — It's time for ... Indicators of the Week! It is a recurring Indicator show where they talk about fascinating numbers from the news. In this episode: America's small GDP increase, a big assist from China's government to its lower income residents, and a high-grossing, centuries-old Monkey King. Listen here

Also on The Indicator: What does the next era of Social Security look like?; Are pharmacy benefit managers driving up drug prices? (Update); How to pass on a global media empire; and Could you live without GPS? It's OK, the economy can't, either

Stream your local NPR station.

Visit NPR.org to find your local station stream.

Subscribe to Planet Money+. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes.

What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: planetmoney@npr.org

Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can sign up here.

Looking for more great content? Check out all of our newsletter offerings — including Daily News, Politics, Health and more!

You received this message because you're subscribed to Planet Money emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002

Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy

Ten economic insights from covering the presidential candidates

Ten Econ Takeaways From Trump and Harris

Get Bonus Content

On Our Podcasts

Older messages

Have economists gone out of fashion in Washington?

So many music festivals have been canceled this year. What's going on?

Where Kamala Harris Studied Economics

What Can We Learn From Millions Of High School Yearbook Photos?

Great minds assemble to bid farewell to Planet Money Summer School 2024

You Might Also Like

⭕️ A tech play with a nice ring to it

Imagine finally becoming a homeowner

Check, Please

The Market Rally Indicator Just Turned Green

⚔️ Google's AI competition

John's Take 12-19-24 The Impending Crash

☕ A Decade of Women and Money

The Bank Underground Christmas Quiz 2024

Elon Musk’s New Prediction: “This Will Transform Everything”

Can you protect your pet and your budget?