But Lightning has become controversial all over again, recently. The European Parliament has taken electronics manufacturers to task for electronic waste, insisting that it would be better if there was just one universally used connector across devices from every company.
Of course, there are really only two connectors in use in cellphones these days: USB-C and Lightning. Since only Apple uses Lightning, the clear implication is that Apple should switch to USB-C.
Trouble is, Apple doesn’t take kindly to being told what to do and it has pushed back, saying that being forced to switch to USB-C would reduce innovation.
The company has a point. USB-C is thicker than Lightning, so on the slimmest of devices there may be issues squeezing in such a connection. Apple, by the way, has also told me that the either-way-up aspect that’s such a joy was thought up by Apple and USB-C reaped the benefit when it was created with a similarly symmetrical design.
Lightning also influenced USB-C with its capability for bi-directional power delivery, for instance.
And Lightning is still developing. If you have an iPhone 11 Pro or iPhone 12 Pro, for instance, if you connect through a cable, it can trigger an external flash accessory for photographers. That is not part of the USB-C specifications.
Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo also pointed out this week that Lightning is better at waterproofing than USB-C.
All of which leads us to another rumor, that future iPhones may ditch Lightning, but not for USB-C. Instead, as pointed out by Apple Insider, Kuo feels that one day Apple might move to an iPhone with no port at all, relying on MagSafe and wireless charging instead. Kuo said, “If the iPhone abandons Lightning in the future, it may directly adopt the portless design with MagSafe support instead of using a USB-C port.”
Apple obviously really doesn’t want to be told to use USB-C, then. Of course, it’s happy to do so on some devices, such as the iPad Air, but that’s because Apple decided that’s the best way to go for that gadget.
Portless is a curious idea – though the prospect of a wire-free iPhone is certainly appealing. It would certainly make for an even more sleek and minimal iPhone design.
But there are issues. Wireless charging does not match the charging speeds of wired. Second, how do you connect your iPhone to your Mac if you need to restore the iPhone? Third, whether you like it or not, you’ll need to listen on headphones wirelessly.
All these issues are awaiting us in the brave new world of all-wireless tech. But, it seems, not yet.
Ming-Chi Kuo’s conclusion, which also factors in the fact that Apple earns a royalty from every Made for iPhone accessory, such as Lightning, is that the current connector will be here “for the foreseeable future”. So, don’t go throwing those cables away just yet.
|