Monday, August 9th 2021 - Issue #1051

No taxation without representation

It's been an unusual last couple of weeks here at the Bent. It is unusual for us to focus on a single topic as consistently as we've focused on the omnibus bi-partisan infrastructure bill that is currently being voted on in the United States. However, I feel as if this moment calls for a bit of focus because it may prove to be a very critical juncture in Bitcoin's path to ultimate success. As we rounded out 2020 into 2021, I mentioned by belief that Bitcoin reached a cultural tipping point last year in the wake of Bitcoin being talked about more seriously by many respected institutional investors, pro athletes and politicians. Like it or not, the masses look to these types for trend setting. And like it or love it, a number of individuals in these circles helped bring legitimacy to bitcoin in the eyes of many in 2020. Think Paul Tudor Jones, Russell Okung, and Senator Cynthia Lummis.

That was a great step for Bitcoin to take. Becoming more palatable to people who tend to look for confirming signals from individuals they admire is progress.

Bitcoin completed another kind of step over the last couple of weeks; it cemented itself as a force to be reckoned with in US politics. The inclusion of a provision that would create a considerable amount of uncertainty for particular players within the industry budding around Bitcoin became the main focus of a bi-partisan omnibus spending bill that many though would fly through the Senate and the House. The debate over the language included in the "crypto" provision delayed the vote multiple time. Ultimately, the bill made it through the Senate with the original language in tact. If it makes it through the House it will likely be signed into law by the Big Guy and "brokers", as defined by the vague language written into the provision, will be "required" to provide more information to the IRS. Whether or not that ends up happening is another question. We will begin to find out in 2023 when the market will be compelled to comply with that provision.

The question that lingers in your Uncle Marty's mind at the moment is, "How many will comply when compelled by a Federal government that is viewed as illegitimate?" At what point do people begin to realize that they are in the same spot the Founding Fathers of the United States Republic found themselves in right before their revolution?

If you've been following the developments surrounding the infrastructure bill, the efforts to get "appropriate language" included in the bill, and the bill passing the Senate as originally written because of an 84-year-old Senator from Alabama "mad" about not having enough money allocated to the War Machine and Bernie Sanders, you've come to realize how corrupt the system is. You've come to question whether or not the system even attempts to put a minimal amount of effort into pretending that they care about your input via the "democratic" voting process.The bill is so long and so filled with absolute trash written by a hodgepodge of lobbyists representing the interests behind the politicians voting on these laws that it is insulting to insinuate it is representative of the desires of the American voting class. For those who have not been very skeptical of the political class and have been swept up in the coverage of this particular provision, this could be an eye opening moment. The process isn't as fair as they were led to believe. In fact, it's not fair at all.

The individual doesn't have any representation at the Federal level. Lobbyists write the laws. The power structure is willing to sacrifice a golden goose in the womb for the sake of one on its death bed. Couldn't one make the argument that it is completely warranted to openly rebel by vocally opting out and campaigning for others to do the same? What is the best, most peaceful path forward?

I humbly suggest that individuals who want Bitcoin to succeed as quickly as possible shift their focus away from the federal government and toward individual states.

Final thought...

The WWE should have never bent the knee to the World Wildlife Fund. Very low T of them.

Share

Forward

Hope you enjoyed today's issue. If you have any friends that are looking to find out more about Bitcoin have them sign up for this newsletter here:

Get Ƀent

Ƀent noun 1. direction taken, as by one's interests; inclination.

Thanks for reading Marty's Ƀent, a daily newsletter containing all the information I found interesting in the Bitcoin world in the last 24 hours.

Marty's Ƀent - August 9th, 2021 - Issue #1051

No taxation without representation

Older messages

The Sat Standard - Bitcoin Weekly - August 7th 2021

Marty's Ƀent - August 6th, 2021 - Issue #1050

Marty's Ƀent - August 5th, 2021 - Issue #1049

Marty's Ƀent - August 4th, 2021 - Issue #1048

Marty's Ƀent - August 3rd, 2021 - Issue #1047

You Might Also Like

CryptoQuant Research Director: Halving is imminent and Bitcoin price has room to continue to rise

Fetch.ai, SingularityNET, and Ocean Protocol’s planned $7.5 billion ASI token to launch in May

Claim $AVAX with LayerZero Quest

DeFi & L1L2 Weekly - 💱 Ondo Finance Successfully Tests Near-Instant Conversion Between USDC and BUIDL

DeFi & L1L2 Weekly - 💱 Ondo Finance Successfully Tests Near-Instant Conversion Between USDC and BUIDL

Interpreting the underlying design mechanisms and limitations of the Runes protocol

Analyst predicts low inflows for Hong Kong’s newly approved Bitcoin, Ethereum ETFs

Bitcoin’s 4th Halving

Chinese Top VC Discuss Controversial Topics: Is AI+Crypto and Bitcoin L2 Just Hype? Is Binance Too Monopolistic?

Hong Kong approves Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs as US lingers on ETH approval