The media's systemic failure on Afghanistan
Welcome to Popular Information, a newsletter about politics and power — written by me, Judd Legum. After two decades of war, President Biden finally made the decision to fully withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan. It did not go as planned. The Afghan government and security forces, which the United States spent two decades building up, evaporated in days. The Taliban, the Islamist group which harbored Al Qaeda before the 9/11 attacks, quickly regained control over the country. This was a failure that comes with real consequences for innocent Afghans. At particular risk are the Afghans that assisted US efforts, who may face retribution if they remain in the country, and women and girls, who may be stripped of their rights by the repressive Taliban regime. But was this primarily a failure by Biden, for deciding to withdraw now? Or was it the unavoidable conclusion of failed policies in Afghanistan across four presidential administrations? Most coverage has focused criticism on Biden. And to bolster that argument, media outlets are relying on many of the people responsible for two decades of failure in Afghanistan. While there are legitimate criticisms of the way Biden executed the withdrawal, the result is an extremely distorted narrative. Inside the Washington Post's "straight news" piece on AfghanistanLet's examine, for example, this piece in the Washington Post: "Biden’s promise to restore competence to the presidency is undercut by chaos in Afghanistan." Although this is presented as a "straight news" piece, the entire premise is that Biden's decision to withdraw reflects his own incompetence. The author, Matt Viser, reports that the decision and its execution reflected "an inability to plan" and "an underestimation of a foreign adversary." As proof, Viser cites, "leading lawmakers and others" who believe that "the chaotic, and deadly, implementation of [Biden's] decision reflects a failure by Biden at a critical moment to deliver the steady leadership and sound judgment he promised." Who are these "leading lawmakers and others"? The same people who have been consistently wrong about Afghanistan strategy for the last twenty years. The lead quote comes from former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta who said Biden's decision to withdraw reflects the fact that Biden "didn’t really spend much time on the issue" and the Biden administration was simply "crossing their fingers and hoping chaos would not result." But is Panetta a credible voice on how policies will play out in Afghanistan? In a November 2011 interview with Charlie Rose, Panetta said that the military campaign in Afghanistan had "seriously weakened the Taliban" and now the Afghan people were "able to control their own fate." He said that the development of the Afghan army and police force was "on target" and they were "doing the job." This was a consistent refrain during Panetta's tenure as Secretary of Defense. "[W]e are moving in the right direction, and we are winning this very tough conflict here in Afghanistan," Panetta said in December 2011. After a March 2012 visit to Afghanistan, Panetta was even more optimistic. "Afghanistan needs to be able to govern and secure itself," Panetta said. "We are very close to accomplishing that." In January 2013, Panetta announced we had entered "the last chapter of establishing a sovereign Afghanistan that can govern and secure itself for the future." Panetta, of course, was wrong about all of this. Afghanistan was not "close" to being able to "govern and secure itself" in 2012. The "last chapter" of establishing a sovereign Afghanistan did not occur in 2013. Nor was Afghanistan ready to "govern and secure itself" eight years later. But, year after year, that rosy picture was used to continue to sell the war to the American people. As recently as June of this year, Panetta was touting the "progress" that had been made in building up the Afghan security forces and government.
But it was the failure of the Afghan government and security forces to survive even a few days in 2021 that made Biden's withdrawal so chaotic. Had the institutions touted by Panetta held, even for a short period of time, evacuations could have occurred in a more orderly fashion. But neither Panetta's role in the failed mission, nor his history of poor judgments about the trajectory of the country, are mentioned in the Washington Post. Instead he's given free rein to paper over his involvement and place the blame on Biden. This is not an isolated problem. Panetta was also quoted by Fox News, the New York Post, The Hill, MSNBC, NBC News, the New York Daily News, CNN and many other outlets. None of them noted Panetta's prior inaccurate predictions about the future of Afghanistan. The next person quoted in the Washington Post piece is Ryan Crocker, the former Ambassador to Afghanistan during the Bush and Obama administrations. His criticism of Biden is even harsher. "I’m left with some grave questions in my mind about his ability to lead our nation as commander in chief," Crocker said. Like Panetta, Crocker also touted the Afghan military and police, saying in a 2012 speech to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace that the security forces represented an "amazing achievement." He described the group as a "capable” and “multifaceted," and claimed they were "close to their maximum strength of 352,000." Like Panetta, Crocker was wrong about their capability and size. Crocker also touted the "courage and determination" of President Hamid Karzai. But Karzai had "won reelection after cronies stuffed thousands of ballot boxes." After securing power, Karzai presided over a deeply corrupt and incompetent government. Kabul Bank, the country's largest bank, nearly collapsed under the "weight of $1 billion in fraudulent loans." Among the recipients was Karzai's brother, Mahmoud Karzai. Crocker's predecessor, Karl Eikenberry, pressed Karzai to take action in response to the Kabul Bank scandal. But when Crocker replaced Eikenberry in 2011 that ended. Crocker's "attitude was to make the issue go away, bury it as deep as possible, and silence any voices within the embassy that wanted to make this an issue,” according to interviews conducted by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. Crocker's role in covering up the corruption of the Afghan government is not mentioned in Viser's Washington Post article or the other outlets that quoted him for criticizing the withdrawal — NBC News, The Hill, Axios, and Fox News. The next pundit Viser quotes is Eliot A. Cohen, a prominent hawk who advised Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice during the Bush administration. Cohen calls Biden's decision "very bad" and a "moral disaster." But Cohen would likely criticize most military withdrawals. He recently wrote a book calling for "a substantially larger military" and more wars. He even suggests the U.S. should be more open to nuclear war. "The actual use of nuclear weapons by the United States is not a last resort," Cohen writes. Finally, Viser includes brief, critical quotes about the withdrawal from four members of Congress who have supported and funded operations in Afghanistan for many years — Senators Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Lindsay Graham (R-SC), and Mark Warner (D-VA), and Congressman Seth Moulton (D-MA). The heard and the unheardUnrepresented in Viser's piece are any voices that supported withdrawing U.S. forces from Afghanistan — even though a poll last month found that 73% of Americans supported withdrawal. A poll taken August 13-16, amid unrelentingly negative press coverage of the decision, showed that support for the withdrawal dropped significantly. The number of Americans who support withdrawal, however, is still substantially larger than the number of Americans who oppose it. But the Washington Post piece, and many other news articles, only include critics. The opinions of critics of the withdrawal from Afghanistan — many of whom were complicit in the failed policy over 20 years — are then laundered by prominent media figures as "fact." As Jon Alsop notes in the Columbia Journalism Review, NBC's Chuck Todd asserted that the withdrawal from Afghanistan will "haunt Mr. Biden’s legacy" and Axios' Mike Allen called it an "embarrassment." The one-sided coverage of the military withdrawal from Afghanistan mirrors the mistakes made in the run-up to the Iraq War. Then, "Bush administration officials were the most frequently quoted sources, the voices of anti-war groups and opposition Democrats were barely audible, and the overall thrust of coverage favored a pro-war perspective." Nearly two decades later, history is repeating itself. To stay completely independent, Popular Information accepts no advertising. This newsletter only exists because of the support of readers like you. |
Older messages
The January 6 corporate accountability index
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
After a violent mob stormed the Capitol building in January, hundreds of corporations pledged to make changes to their political giving. Some corporations pledged to withhold PAC funding to the 147
How to unrig democracy
Monday, August 16, 2021
The Census Bureau has finally released the granular data from the 2020 Census that will allow states to begin the redistricting process. The only thing at stake is the future of democracy itself.
Corporate PR will not solve the climate crisis
Friday, August 13, 2021
This week the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released the first part of its sixth assessment on climate change. The report, which represents the consensus view of thousands of the
How to keep kids in school
Friday, August 13, 2021
Across the country, children are returning to school. For some kids, it's the first time they will be back in the classroom full-time since the pandemic began in March 2020. It's the
Texas Governor focuses on denying workers paid sick leave
Tuesday, August 10, 2021
The Delta variant is ravaging Texas. "9027 Texans are hospitalized for the coronavirus" — nearing the prior peaks of July 2020 and January 2021. Worse, "hospitalizations are increasing
You Might Also Like
4 kitchen gadgets worth the drawer space
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
In defense of unitaskers View in browser The Recommendation (Actually useful) kitchen unitaskers we love Photo illustration by Marki Williams/NYT Wirecutter; source photos by Marcato, OXO Most of the
Seattle ranks No. 3 in software startup funding list | Amazon starts drone deliveries in Phoenix
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Former Gates Foundation leader raises $1.8M for bamboo materials startup ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Unlock Seamless Communication: BYON integrates T-Mobile calling into apps, smart devices
Tidy Coffin
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Recursion, Tidy Stars, And Water Lilies // The Coffin In The Roof Tidy Coffin By Kaamya Sharma • 5 Nov 2024 View in browser View in browser Recursion, Tidy Stars, And Water Lilies Marco Giancotti |
☕ Number brunching
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
A loyalty program with a weekday bonus. November 05, 2024 Retail Brew Presented By Omnisend It's Tuesday, and many of you might be on your way back from the voting booth. As some experts have
The GeekWire Gala returns: Grab early-bird tickets today!
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
The GeekWire Gala returns December 12: Grab early-bird tickets today! View this email in your browser Early-bird tickets on sale for the GeekWire Gala! The GeekWire Gala kicks off the holiday season in
☕ United we stan
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
MTV and Paramount are using fandom culture to get out the vote. November 05, 2024 Marketing Brew Presented By Contentful It's Tuesday. It's also Election Day in the US. If you're avoiding
Special Edition: Election Day is here.
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
And so is our final analysis. Special Edition: Election Day is here. And so is our final analysis. By Isaac Saul • 5 Nov 2024 View in browser View in browser Our election night livestream lineup. I
☄️ Space Debris Incoming
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Plus: Hugh Grant layers 'Heretic' with devious intensity. Inverse Daily A religious horror-thriller with nothing on its mind throws everything at the wall. A24 Review Hugh Grant Layers '
Why are poll watchers at my polling place?
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
+ Quincy Jones' visionary approach to arranging
Russian Plot Foiled, Times' Techs on Strike, and Surreal Dogs
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
Western spy agencies have accused Russia of plotting to send incendiary devices on planes bound for the US and Canada in an effort to undermine support for Ukraine. ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏