Supreme Court term preview - NFL concussion policy criticized - Credit Suisse concern

For nearly two hours [on Monday] the justices debated the scope of the Clean Water Act, the 1972 law that gives the EPA authority to regulate the "waters of the United States" but that left the definition of that term somewhat ambiguous. Several members of the 6-3 conservative majority tossed cold water on the standard the EPA uses to determine if such a wetland is subject to federal permitting requirements and oversight.
...
Before the justices emerged, the court announced it added nine cases to a docket already full of contentious issues. Among the new cases was a challenge to the immunity that shields social media firms from lawsuits over user-generated content. Yet it declined to review the federal ban on bump stocks, [which] let a shooter fire a semi-automatic rifle more rapidly.
...
[Other major issues on the docket include]: A challenge to race-conscious [university] admissions policies; a case that questions how much power state legislatures have to set the rules of federal elections; and a challenge to a Colorado law that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ people.