Good morning! The world’s largest democratic exercise got underway on Friday. Even as voters headed to polling booths, a shadow hangs over the integrity of electronic voting machines. Scepticism has intensified with opposition parties alleging machine bias for the ruling party. The revelation that the chips used in the machines are reprogrammable has added to the suspicion. The Election Commission of India had claimed they could be programmed only once. A remedy was sought in voter verifiable paper audit trail or VVPATs but that issue is pending in the Supreme Court. The court heard the matter on Thursday and reserved its order. Here is an analysis of the issue of trust in electronic voting machines. Plus, some of the best long reads of the week.

If you enjoy reading us, why not give us a follow at @thesignaldotco on Twitter, Instagram, and Threads.

Deepanshu Mohan, Zahid Iqbal Shah, and Najam Us Saqib

Electronic voting machines are coming under the spotlight as India prepares for its general election.

There are fears about the fairness and openness of India’s voting system, with the previous unwavering faith in the country’s EVMs now in doubt.

The Indian Supreme Court has reserved its order in a plea seeking cross-verification of votes cast in EVMs with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT).

The potential for voting machine hacking has cast a shadow over India’s democratic landscape. There is apprehension in some quarters that the devices can be manipulated. 

The Opposition has directly alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi relies on EVM hacking to win elections. At a recent rally in Mumbai, Rahul Gandhi, the leader of India’s largest opposition party, asserted: “The king’s (Modi’s) soul is in the EVM”.

Electoral processes have evolved significantly over time. Initially, voters used traditional ballot papers, manually writing candidates’ names and depositing them in  designated boxes. 

As India’s population grew and concerns about electoral fraud associated with ballot papers escalated, the People’s Representation Act was amended in 1989 to enable EVMs to prevent electoral fraud. In 1998, EVMs made their debut during legislative assembly elections. Their first use at a general election was in 2004.

This transition to voting machines underscores the nation’s commitment to modernising its electoral infrastructure, ensuring efficiency, transparency and integrity of the polling process.

In 2017, the Delhi Assembly convened a special session, where Saurabh Bharadwaj, an Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) legislator, demonstrated with a dummy EVM how easily it could be hacked.

Bharadwaj claimed that a “manipulator” could enter the polling booth during voting and input a unique secret code, resulting in subsequent votes being directed to a particular candidate. 

He also claimed an EVM’s motherboard could be changed in just 90 seconds. AAP later posted the results of this demonstration on its Twitter page, showing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) receiving more votes than it  actually obtained in the final results.

As the majority party in the Delhi Assembly and now governing Punjab, AAP’s vocal stance against voying maschine integrity has implications for the trust of India’s 969 million voters in the election process. 

The scepticism surrounding voting machines has intensified, with opposition parties including AAP and INC voicing concerns about potential bias favoring the ruling party. 

Recent state elections in Rajasthan, Telangana, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh showed discrepancies between election results and exit polls leading to vehement protests. 

An incident during the Bihar elections further eroded trust. The manipulation of EVMs left citizens questioning the legitimacy of results The Election Commission of India (ECI) attempted to address these concerns but widespread scepticism remained.

A critical revelation emerged from a Right to Information (RTI) request: EVMs do not have software permanently burnt into one-time programmable (OTP) chips, as previously claimed by the ECI. Instead, they use chips that can be reprogrammed. 

While hacking EVMs would still require physical access to the machines used in elections, this revelation has fuelled mistrust among voters.

The apprehensions harboured by the general populace regarding the integrity of voting machines have transcended the concerns of political parties to encompass civil society at large. 

In a noteworthy demonstration of dissent, numerous individuals, including Ambedkarite advocates, legal professionals, and other members of civil society convened at Delhi's Jantar Mantar on February 2, 2024.demanding the prohibition of EVMs. 

Advocates of this stance have persistently voiced their reservations regarding EVMs across various regions of India, notably through the #EVM_ban campaign in anticipation of the forthcoming 2024 general elections. Thousands of tweets were made under this hashtag from across the country. 

Some people even tweeted that they would stay away from the election process if  EVMs are not replaced. The objections regarding EVMs is not a recent development. Intriguingly, its origins go back to the 1980s, predating their actual deployment in elections. 

The seminal legal case of AC Jose vs. Sivan Pillai represents an early instance, wherein a petition was filed seeking a stay order on the utilisation of EVMs for an impending bi-election in Kerala.

The SC ruled in the favour of the petitioner and ordered a repoll in the 50 booths using paper ballots.As a result, Jose defeated Pillai, the winner in the first vote, with a margin of around 2000 votes. 

During the 1990s, Election Commissioner T.N. Seshan recognised the urgency of addressing ballot frauds. He championed the development of EVMs as a potential solution. While political parties have raised concerns, no concrete evidence has been presented to prove EVM manipulation. Nevertheless, the issue persists. 

As India prepares for the 2024 general elections, addressing EVM-related apprehensions remains critical.

In order to save the democratic ethos of India, EVM hacking must be addressed. Enhancing accountability and transparency in EVM deployment and procurement processes can boost voter confidence. 

Robust oversight procedures, such as impartial audits and exacting testing procedures can be employed. Additionally, procuring advanced EVM technology with enhanced security features, such as end-to-end verifiable systems and paper audit trails, can strengthen the integrity of electoral outcomes. 

Raising public awareness and engagement through comprehensive civic education initiatives can empower citizens to actively participate in safeguarding the electoral process. This will boost the confidence of a common voter in the electoral process. 

Instead of completely rejecting the use of EVMs, efforts must concentrate on utilising technical innovations to uphold democratic principles (and ensure due process in the machine’s use). 

It is vital that everyone – the ruling parties, opposition parties, civil society organizations, voters, democratic institutions, and technology centres – are brought together in this democratic exercise to take joint action in securing the sanctity of the world’s largest and most expansive electoral process. 

Deepanshu Mohan is Professor of Economics and Dean, O.P. Jindal Global University. He is a Visiting Professor at London School of Economics and University of Oxford. 

Zahid Iqbal Shah is a doctoral student with the Central University of Kashmir. 

Najam Us Saqib is a doctoral student with Central University, Kashmir, and a Research Analyst with Centre for New Economics Studies, O.P. Jindal Global University.

Originally published under Creative Commons by 360info™.

ICYMI

Cable sentinels: Modern life is unimaginable without the Internet. As we swipe and type away on smartphones, internet connectivity is taken for granted. What we do not see is the 800,000 miles of cables that snake along the ocean floors which transport 99% of the world’s data back and forth between continents. If all those cables snap simultaneously—about 200 cable breaks happen every year—the world will stop spinning in a manner of speaking. Keeping them in ship shape are an unknown bunch of people who spend most of their lives on sea. They work through storms, tsunamis, and even dangerous nuclear radiation. There are 77 cable ships in the world but only 22 dedicated to repairing them. It’s an ageing fleet manned by ageing teams. It is hard to find new recruits for the solitary life far from land and family. There are other challenges too such as constant pressure from the industry to reduce costs and geopolitical tensions. The Verge follows cable maintenance ship Ocean Link and its crew to bring alive the fascinating industry that makes the world tick.

Cute fits hide uncomfortable truths: How many times have we bought a cute outfit online after seeing someone wearing it on social media? In the US, Chinese fast fashion retailer Shein made it to the top selling a mind-boggling array of cheap, shiny clothes via influencers and bloggers long before it became a business model for all. This story in The Guardian tells Shein’s story through the eyes of a fashion enthusiast who spent the 2010s drawing inspiration from enthusiasts of vintage fashion and DIY, before being seduced away by Zara and later, H&M. These brands, synonymous with ‘fast fashion’, have struggled to shake off the image of exploitative factories and landfills full of cheap clothes. None of that has stemmed Shein’s rise. Rather, anti-China sentiments are fuelling American backlash to the company and its plans for a public listing in the US. None of this matters though; after all, kids are buying Shein, not adults. 

All hype, little substance: Molly White is best known for Web3 Is Going Just Great. Perhaps the most high-profile (and badass) crypto and Web3 sceptic, White has now set her sights on artificial intelligence (AI). Sorta. In the latest edition of her newsletter Citation Needed, she stresses that there’s a yawning gap between what AI majors are promising to clients, investors, and the media, and the reality of how today’s AI tools function. That’s not to say ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, etc. are utterly useless. But their indispensability, if at all, begins and ends with menial or repetitive tasks even in coding, where White says they (relatively) shine. Why then are companies claiming that AI will be able to write, edit, draw, or even direct? Your guess is as good as ours.