|
David Zipper is a senior fellow at the MIT Mobility Initiative, where he examines the interplay between transportation policy, technology, and society. He is a contributing writer for Vox. |
|
|
|
David Zipper is a senior fellow at the MIT Mobility Initiative, where he examines the interplay between transportation policy, technology, and society. He is a contributing writer for Vox. |
|
|
What America’s deadliest roads have in common |
Some 110 years ago, a picturesque new road known as Roosevelt Boulevard began ferrying vehicles across the nascent but burgeoning neighborhoods of North and Northeast Philadelphia. At first, traffic was light, but it rapidly thickened as car ownership rose and the surrounding area developed. By the 1950s, when the boulevard expanded to meet the new Schuylkill Expressway, it was lined with row houses and shops. Today, what was initially a bucolic parkway has become a traffic-snarled, 12-lane thoroughfare snaking its way through neighborhoods that house 1 in 3 Philadelphians.
It is, by all accounts, a mess.
Dubbed the “corridor of death,” Roosevelt Boulevard has been named the most dangerous street in the city (and among the most dangerous in the nation). In 2022, 59 pedestrians were killed there. Residents “want to get across the street to the pharmacy to get their medication or get across the street to the supermarket,” Latanya Byrd, whose niece and three nephews were killed in a crash on the boulevard in 2013, said in a video produced by Smart Growth America. “It may take two, maybe three lights, for them to get all the way across.”
It’s not just pedestrians who loathe Roosevelt Boulevard. “People who walk, drive, or take public transit are all pretty badly screwed,” Philadelphia’s public radio station declared in 2017. Aware of the road’s shortcomings, city officials have long sought design changes that would reduce crashes. But they are powerless to act on their own, because the boulevard is controlled by the state of Pennsylvania.
That situation is common across the United States, where many of the most deadly, polluting, and generally awful urban streets are overseen by state departments of transportation (DOTs). Often they were constructed decades ago, when the surrounding areas were sparsely populated.
Although only 14 percent of urban road miles nationwide are under state control, two-thirds of all crash deaths in the 101 largest metro areas occur there, according to a recent Transportation for America report. In some places, this disparity is widening: From 2016 to 2022, road fatalities in Austin, Texas, fell 20 percent on locally managed roads while soaring 98 percent on those the state oversees.
“The country is littered with roads that are a legacy of the past, that don’t work very well, and that drive people crazy,” said US Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), who calls them “legacy highways.”
But instead of fixing such roadways, state officials tend to keep them as they are, citing limited resources or a need to maintain traffic speeds. In doing so, they constrain the capacity of even the most comprehensive local reforms to respond to urgent problems like car crash deaths. |
Why we have state highways |
In the early 1900s, states from coast to coast created transportation agencies to build smooth, wide roads that enabled long-distance car trips. When Americans went on a car-buying binge after World War II, states like Michigan widened their highways with the goal of keeping traffic moving quickly, a prime directive for engineers.
Their designers paid little attention to transit, sidewalks, or tree cover — features that are often afterthoughts for rural roads, but crucial in more densely populated areas. As with Philadelphia’s Roosevelt Boulevard, the width and traffic speed of state roads in urban neighborhoods now frequently clash with local desires for street safety and quality transit service. But revising them is rarely a priority for state DOTs engaged in a Sisyphean battle against traffic congestion.
Even sympathetic state transportation officials may not fix dysfunctional urban roadways due to limited resources and competing needs that include expensive upgrades to bridges and interstates. And lacking the authority to make changes themselves, city officials are stuck. |
The beginnings of a paradigm shift in transportation policy |
With deaths among US pedestrians and cyclists hitting a 40-year high in 2022, a growing number of state DOTs are starting to acknowledge that maximizing vehicle speed is not the only goal that matters on urban roadways. The Pennsylvania DOT, for example, is now working with Philadelphia to at last bring lane redesigns, bus lane improvements, and speed cameras to Roosevelt Boulevard. On the other side of the country, the head of the Washington state DOT has requested $150 million from the state legislature to address the shortcomings of legacy highways.
Still, fixing the deficiencies of state roadways requires a paradigm shift within state DOTs, with senior officials accepting that maximizing car speeds jeopardizes crucial local priorities like accommodating pedestrians, enabling rapid transit service, or supporting outdoor dining. Federal money could help finance redesigns — if state officials know how to use it. “There’s a lack of knowledge about the flexibility of federal dollars, with misunderstandings and different interpretations,” said NACTO’s Seskin.
Recognizing the issue, over the summer, the Federal Highway Administration published guidance and held a webinar highlighting dozens of federal funding programs available to upgrade legacy highways.
At the moment, President-elect Donald Trump and incoming congressional Republicans show little appetite for transportation reforms, but a golden opportunity will come during the development of the next multiyear surface transportation bill, which is expected to be passed after the 2026 midterms. Although Blumenauer did not run for reelection this month, he said he hopes the future bill will include a competitive grant program that invites state and local officials to submit joint proposals to upgrade state highways in urban areas, with federal dollars acting as a sweetener. Otherwise, these state roads will continue to obstruct urban residents’ most cherished goals of safety, clean air, and public space.
Flourishing cities cannot coexist with fast, decrepit roads. Too many state officials have not yet learned that lesson.
Read the whole story on Vox. |
|
|
|
The quest to live forever has taken us from diet fads to geographic fantasies like Blue Zones. But none of these ideas are based in reality, according to Washington Post health columnist Anahad O'Connor and Saul Justin Newman, a researcher on aging. |
|
|
Joshua Lott/Washington Post/Getty Images |
Voters wanted a plan for Gaza. The candidates weren’t interested: When it came to a vision for how to end the war in Gaza, President Joe Biden, democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, and former President and now President-elect Donald Trump failed to offer a compelling message. The results of the presidential race indicate that American politicians may have to rethink the country’s relationship with Israel in order to pull in concerned voters.
There are some new faces in Trump’s administration: And familiar ones, too. During President-elect Donald Trump’s first term in the White House, his Cabinet oversaw major changes to the executive branch, such as pulling back worker protections and attempting to cut education spending. Trump has indicated he wants to go further and move faster this time. His most recent picks send signals about his future decisions on immigration, foreign policy, and climate.
A possible change to checks and balances: President-elect Donald Trump is pushing for the next Senate majority leader to allow recess appointments, which would allow him to install some officials without Senate confirmation when Congress is not in session. The move could significantly expand presidential power, and critics say it increases the risk of unqualified or corrupt appointees filling government posts.
Shrinkflation has us doing toilet paper math: If one roll of “Ultra” toilet paper is equivalent to five regular rolls, well then, what’s a regular roll? Toilet paper packaging these days has us reaching for our calculators, and our wallets.To figure out what’s going on, we spoke to retail experts about the sneaky truth: There are actually fewer sheets per roll these days.
Let’s talk about STIs, baby: Safe sex doesn’t just mean condoms anymore. New vaccines, tests, pills, and other forms of sexual health care are more available than ever to help users prevent their risk of HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and more. Here’s our guide to the golden age of STI prevention and treatment.
|
Bitcoin’s in a bull market: As Americans anticipate that President-elect Donald Trump’s administration will be pro-crypto, bitcoin climbs over $88,000 for the first time. [Bloomberg]
Costco cardholders beware: Kirkland Signature, the beloved big box store’s exclusive brand, has announced a class II recall on over 80,000 pounds of butter. [Food & Wine] |
|
|
“There is something enchanting and powerful, even romantic, about the idea of an animal escape, especially if it results in the animal’s rescue from confinement. Yet the law generally fails to recognize the moral tug that these escapes place on our collective conscience.” |
—Animal law experts Angela Fernandez and Justin Marceau on why animal escape stories captivate us Last week, 43 monkeys escaped from an Alpha Genesis research laboratory in Yemassee, South Carolina. While 25 monkeys were found, an animal protection group S has called on the USDA to prosecute Alpha Genesis as a repeat violator of its duty to keep the animals secure.
Legal scholars find animal escape cases fascinating because they highlight the disconnect between the law and our morals. There is often great public sympathy for animals that escape zoos, factory farms, or research labs — even among people who might otherwise tolerate animal suffering in other settings. You can read more about the Alpha Genesis monkeys, and the moral meaning of animal escapes, here.
|
Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can sign up for it right here.
And as always, we want to know what you think. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know by filling out this form or just replying to this email.
Today’s edition was produced and edited by senior editor Lavanya Ramanathan, with contributions from staff editor Melinda Fakuade. We'll see you tomorrow! |
|
|
This email was sent to you. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution.
View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|