What we learned from the first major FEC deadline after the insurrection
Over the last 48 hours, Popular Information has reviewed hundreds of campaign finance reports from the Republicans who voted to overturn the election. We don't usually publish on Saturday, but wanted to share our findings. Specifically, we wanted you to know which companies are standing by their pledges to suspend donations and which companies are breaking their promises. An informed public is key to holding these corporations accountable. You can help expand our capacity to do this work with a paid subscription. Popular Information is fiercely independent and accepts no advertising. This reporting is only possible because of the support of readers like you. After the January 6 attack on the Capitol, about 170 companies announced they were suspending donations from their corporate PACSs to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election results or to all members of Congress. Last Thursday, April 15, was the first major campaign finance deadline since the corporations made these pledges. All members of the House and Senate were required to report the campaign donations received over the first three months of 2021. Popular Information reviewed the first quarter campaign finance report for every Republican objector. These filings reveal that, so far, nearly all the corporations who said they were suspending donations after January 6 have kept their word. Further, the vast majority of other corporations — corporations who said they were reconsidering their PAC donations after January 6 or said nothing at all — withheld donations to the 147 Republican objectors. There were 1100 individual corporate PACs that donated to the 147 objectors last cycle, according to Maplight. By comparison, only around 70 individual corporate PACs contributed to the objectors in the first three months of 2021. As a result, the Republican objectors received very little corporate PAC money. And most were not able to replace that cash with donations from individuals. For many Republicans, attempting to throw out millions of votes to bolster Trump's lies about election fraud has come with a financial price. But the filings also revealed that there are a few corporations that are charting a very different path. Toyota donates to dozens of Republican objectors"Given recent events and the horrific attack on the U.S. Capitol, we are assessing our future PAC criteria," Toyota said soon after the insurrection. Within a few weeks, however, Toyota resumed donating to members of Congress that voted against certifying the Electoral College. That vote bolstered Trump's false claims of voter fraud and inspired the attack on the Capitol. The first quarter FEC filings reveal that Toyota sent contributions to the campaigns of 40 Republicans who voted to overturn the election results. The contributions, which totaled $62,000, included some of the most bombastic members of the Republican caucus, such as Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ). On January 6, Biggs tweeted that he would "lead the charge" and "fight" to overturn the election results. He also promised to "produce documents" during the debate with evidence of "fraud." Even after the insurrection, Biggs defended Trump's conduct. On February 9, Biggs insisted that Trump "did not incite a riot" and there was nothing wrong with anything Trump had said. Later that month, on February 26, Biggs received a $1,000 check from Toyota. On March 8, Toyota sent Biggs a second $1,000 check. Why did Toyota donate to so many members who voted to overturn the election results? In an email to customers obtained by Popular Information, the company said that it "supports candidates based on their position on issues that are important to the auto industry." Toyota claimed to have undertaken a "thorough review" and "decided against giving to some members who, through their statements and actions, undermine the legitimacy of our elections and institutions." But if a Congressman like Biggs met their criteria, it is unclear what conduct would be considered disqualifying. In the email, Toyota also said it does "not believe it is appropriate to judge members of Congress solely based on their votes on election certification." This language was taken word-for-word from a memo issued by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in March. The Chamber was critical of Trump and the members of Congress who support him in the immediate aftermath of January 6. "There are some members who, by their actions will have forfeited the support of the US Chamber of Commerce. Period. Full stop," Neil Bradley, the Chamber's policy chief, said. But in its March memo, the Chamber reversed course and suggested that funds should be withheld only from members who directly organized the activities of January 6 or pushed conspiracy theories after that date.
The memo attempted to recast the vote to overturn the election results as reasonable. The purpose was to provide political cover to major corporations that wish to resume donating to the group of 147 Republicans that objected to the electoral college vote. It's a perspective that Toyota embraced. The Chamber's PAC donated to two Republican objectors in the first three months of 2021 — Congressmen Carlos Gimenez (R-FL) and Steve Chabot (R-OH). Pfizer's "error"After January 6, in an internal memo first reported by Popular Information, Pfizer said it "made the decision that for the next six months, Pfizer PAC will not contribute to any of the 147 Members of Congress who voted against certifying the Electoral College results after the violence that we all witnessed." After that six month period, the company said it would "review our decision and report back to you." But on March 17, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE), who voted against certifying the Electoral College results, reported receiving a $2,500 donation from Pfizer. The company did not respond to repeated requests for comment. But an email from Pfizer's investor relations department, obtained by Popular Information, says that the contribution to Smith was "made in error and has been cancelled."
But, even if Smith's contribution is "cancelled," Pfizer has still been sending money to Republican objectors after January 6. On February 23, Pfizer donated $15,000 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which is run by Senator Rick Scott (R-FL), who voted against certifying the election. The funds Pfizer donated to the NRSC will also benefit other Senate Republicans who voted against certifying the electoral college, including Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), and Senator John Kennedy (R-LA), who is up for reelection in 2022. Cigna's bait-and-switchOn January 13, Cigna, one of the nation's largest heath insurers, issued the following statement:
But in the first three months of 2021, Cigna donated to six members of Congress that hindered a peaceful transition of power by objecting to the certification of the electoral college — Congressmen Byron Donalds (R-FL), Tom Rice (R-SC), Bill Johnson (R-OH), Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA), Jodey Arrington (R-TX), and Billy Long (R-MO). In February, Cigna also donated $15,000 to the NRSC and $15,000 the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the main fundraising vehicle for the Republican caucus of the House of Representatives. Two-thirds of House Republicans, including Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), voted against certifying the Electoral College on January 6. "In January, our PAC discontinued support of any elected official that encouraged or supported violence on January 6th, and that remains true," Cigna told Popular Information last month. Notably, that statement did not mention that it also pledged to discontinue support for elected officials that "hindered a peaceful transition of power." JetBlue reviews "political landscape," sends cash to Republican objectorAfter January 6, JetBlue said it had made "the decision to temporarily pause all contributions as we review the political landscape." By February, that review had concluded and JetBlue donated $1,000 to Congresswoman Nicole Malliotakis (R-NY), who voted to overturn the election result. In a statement to Bloomberg, the company said that, in the course of its review, it "found, like the public in general, that contributors have a wide range of opinions and beliefs about current issues." In other words, the company has come to believe that voting to overturn the results of an election based on lies about voter fraud is just another "opinion." Moving forward, JetBlue says it will donate to candidates that "have specific relevance to JetBlue’s network and business, as well as the aviation industry overall." Koch v. KochThe Koch political network, which is controlled by billionaire Charles Koch, issued a statement saying that the events of January 6 would "weigh heavily" on how it spends its money:
But in the first three months of 2021, Koch Industries, which is also controlled by Charles Koch, donated $17,500 to six members of congress that voted to overturn the election results — Mike Johnson (R-LA), Adrian Smith (R-NE), Ron Estes (R-KS), Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Jim Banks (R-IN), and Richard Hudson (R-NC). Koch Industries has also donated $105,000 to the NRSC in 2021. The Alternative PathOther companies that pledged to suspend donations to the 147 Republicans who voted to overturn the election have resumed contributing to multi-candidate committees that support some or all of those Republicans. After January 6, Intel said, "we will not contribute to members of Congress who voted against certification of the Electoral College results as we feel that action was counter to our company's values." The company donated $15,000 to the NRCC in February. "Our policy halting direct contributions to members of Congress who voted against certification of the Electoral College results still applies," Intel said in a statement to Popular Information last month. On January 11, AT&T said it had "decided to suspend contributions to members of Congress who voted to object to the certification of Electoral College votes this week." In February, the company donated $5,000 to the House Conservatives Fund, the Leadership PAC of Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), who voted against certifying the Electoral College on January 6. The House Conservative Fund also serves as the primary fundraising vehicle for the Republican Study Committee (RSC), which is comprised mostly of members of Congress who voted to overturn the election. In a statement to Popular Information in March, AT&T said the House Conservative Fund "assured" them that none of the money would go to support the re-election of members who voted to overturn the election. The cost of voting to overturn the electionThere was a financial cost for many of the Republicans who chose to validate Trump's lies about election fraud by voting to overturn the election results. Total corporate PAC donations to that group were down 80%, from $6.7 million to $1.3 million, compared to the first quarter of the 2020 cycle, according to an analysis by the Wall Street Journal. Objectors that appear frequently in the media, like Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), were able to more than offset the PAC donations with small donations from the GOP base. But most Republican members of Congress were not able to replace the PAC cash. Two-thirds of the Republican objectors that had comparable data from the last cycle had "overall fundraising declines." Members of Congress that are particularly dependent on corporate PACs experienced dramatic declines. Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO), for example, saw his fundraising drop from $274,000 in the first quarter of 2019 to $43,500 in the first quarter of 2021. Whether this trend continues is an open question. Corporate lobbyists are applying "pressure to resume business as usual, particularly as the initial shock of the Capitol riot fades and the Biden administration pursues policies, like raising corporate taxes, that will give business leaders other reasons to support Republicans." |
Older messages
A Zoom call will not save democracy
Tuesday, April 13, 2021
Over the weekend, about 100 corporate leaders gathered on a Zoom call to discuss how to respond to Republican efforts to restrict voting in nearly every state. Although the call was ostensibly private,
These rainbow flag-waving corporations are backing the sponsors of anti-trans legislation
Monday, April 12, 2021
Seven members of the North Carolina Senate have introduced draconian anti-trans legislation targeting children, adults, and medical professionals. An investigation by Popular Information reveals that
How not to protect free speech
Thursday, April 8, 2021
The free expression of ideas is a bedrock principle for any democratic society. And that is particularly true on college campuses, where many young people are still developing their core beliefs.
Dan Patrick and the damaged Republican psyche
Wednesday, April 7, 2021
There is no greater proponent of Trump's false claims about voter fraud in the 2020 election than Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick (R). Patrick described
McConnell versus the First Amendment
Tuesday, April 6, 2021
In recent days, more corporations have spoken out against voter suppression laws. In Texas, American Airlines and Dell announced their opposition to two major bills to restrict voting under
You Might Also Like
This Glittery Setting Spray Might Not Be a Gimmick
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
The Glinda glisten from Patrick Starrr's Wicked collab. Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an affiliate commission. If you
Book Review: The Origins Of Woke
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
... ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
☕ Subsiding expectations
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Fewer blockbuster VC deals for AI startups. May 01, 2024 Tech Brew PRESENTED BY Splunk It's Wednesday. It'll likely come as no surprise to anyone here that AI is still the big tech news du jour
The Homeowners’ Rebellion
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Wall Street landlords face a heartland backlash that could set off a revolution. Check out our feature below on how deep in the American heartland, residents are taking a small but revolutionary step
Will interest rates stay high all year?
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Plus: A great time for weapons manufacturers, a Trump 2.0 administration, and more May 1, 2024 View in browser Good morning! Today the US Federal Reserve will announce its latest decision about whether
Columbia Crackdown, Binance, and the World's Newest Currency
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Facts, without motives.
Trump backs surveillance and prosecution of women to enforce abortion bans
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
As part of an extensive interview with Time Magazine, former President Donald Trump expanded on what abortion access would look like in the United States in a potential second term. Trump laid out a
Numlock News: May 1, 2024 • Blues, Brakes, Velveeta
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
By Walt Hickey Blues The blues, the musical genre, have had a characteristically difficult time, and have been financially suffering. Now, if there's a genre that is downright built for such
☕️ Skee-Ball wagers
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Is UnitedHealth too big to fail? May 01, 2024 View Online | Sign Up | Shop Morning Brew PRESENTED BY FinanceBuzz Good morning. Turmoil continues to engulf US college campuses coast-to-coast. Late last
Razer made to pay $1.2M over 'N95' face mask that wasn't [Wed May 1 2024]
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Hi The Register Subscriber | Log in The Register {* Daily Headlines *} 1 May 2024 Razer Zephyr mask Razer made to pay $1.2M over 'N95' face mask that wasn't Customers to get their light-up