How TikTok failed to make the case for itself
Here’s this week’s free Platformer — a look at today’s high-stakes hearing about TikTok and how some of the company’s problems are self-inflicted. Does this stuff matter to you? If so, consider becoming a paid subscriber — they get all our breaking news first. Recently, they received our scoop about Twitter’s most recent layoffs, and how they appear to position Boring Company CEO Steve Davis as a likely candidate for Twitter CEO. We’d love to email you those scoops every week. Subscribe now and we’ll send you the link to join us in our chatty Discord server.
How TikTok failed to make the case for itselfAfter a rocky appearance before Congress, the company has reason to reflectOn Thursday morning, the chief executive of what is perhaps the world’s most popular social app went before Congress. Like so many social media CEOs before him, Shou Zi Chew’s mission was to persuade skeptical lawmakers that his company, TikTok, operates responsibly and within the bounds of the law. In the face of doubts and outright hostility, Chew would have to remain calm and genial, attempting to make his case while in the straitjacket of Congress’ hearing format: an hours-long series of mostly yes-or-no questions, his answers preempted by most lawmakers before he could begin a second sentence. It is a ritual previously endured by Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Sundar Pichai, and Jack Dorsey, among others. And while each of them faced withering questions, in the end withering questions is all that Congress really gave them. Hearings like these are often framed as a precursor to stringent regulation, but in the United States they are a substitute for them. Congress yells at social media companies — posting clips of their sickest burns on the very companies they criticize — and then fails to pass a single piece of legislation. TikTok’s hearing might have gone this way, too, were it not for one overarching, bipartisan concern: that the company’s owner, ByteDance, might be forced by the Chinese government to surveil Americans or seek to influence them by promoting pro-China or anti-US content. It’s for that reason that the Biden administration, like the Trump administration before it, now seeks to force ByteDance to divest the app. That’s an outcome that Chew is determined to avoid, he told lawmakers Thursday. “Divestment doesn’t address the fundamental concerns that I have heard, as a change in ownership would not impose any new restrictions on data flows or access,” Chew said in his prepared testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “This is not an issue of nationality. All global companies face common challenges that need to be addressed through safeguards and transparency.” Chew is right that national privacy legislation would do more to protect against the misuse of Americans’ data than divestment or a ban. But there is a fundamental concern that either outcome would address: its Chinese ownership. And while they are far apart on most issues, most Democrats and Republicans at today’s marathon hearing agreed: Chinese ownership of TikTok is untenable. “I still believe that the Beijing, Communist government will still control and influence what you do,” said Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.). The company’s proposed solution, the data-silo initiative it calls Project Texas, “is simply not acceptable,” he said. What happens next is anyone’s guess. The Biden administration seems likely to attempt to force divestiture. China said Thursday that it will strongly oppose such a move, and would prevent ByteDance from spinning out TikTok. That leaves the prospect of a ban, which is in uncertain territory legally. When the Trump administration tried to force a sale, it was blocked by the courts — and experts say the Biden administration is likely to run into the same issues. The Washington Post reported today that the administration believes that Congress would need to pass a law to make an actual ban possible. It would be remarkable if the first meaningful piece of federal tech regulation passed in years was a bill that eliminated TikTok outright. And yet observers of today’s hearing tended to agree that it seems likelier than it did before Chew’s five hours on the stand, during which he was pummeled by lawmakers of both parties for problems both real and fictional. “Shou came prepared to answer questions from Congress, but, unfortunately, the day was dominated by political grandstanding that failed to acknowledge the real solutions already underway through Project Texas or productively address industry-wide issues of youth safety,” TikTok told me in a statement afterward. “Also not mentioned today by members of the Committee: the livelihoods of the 5 million businesses on TikTok or the First Amendment implications of banning a platform loved by 150 million Americans.” I’m sympathetic to those concerns, as I wrote here last week. But it also seems to me that TikTok made several tactical errors alongside the original sin (in Congress’ eyes) of being developed in China. And there may be lessons for the next generation of big consumer apps, who will begin with global ambitions but quickly find themselves faced with similar skepticism from lawmakers and regulators around the world. Incidentally, I don’t see this as merely a case of what China-based apps should learn about launching in the United States. The same underlying logic in this case could well lead to an American app being banned in India, for example. So what went wrong for ByteDance and TikTok? First, it’s important to say again that ByteDance really did have a bad hand to play here. Lawmakers have asked the company to prove a negative — that no one’s data is being misused, and no one is being unduly influenced. Neither the company nor outside investigators have found much evidence of either (emphasis on much). But the looming specter that something can or will go wrong in the future has been extremely difficult for TikTok to overcome. Second, it gave its worst critics powerful ammunition. Amid what once seemed like paranoid fears of surveillance, it surveilled American journalists. Among similar concerns about how TikTok could be used to spread propaganda, ByteDance reportedly pushed pro-China messaging in a now-defunct US news app. ByteDance has said the former case was a case of overreach by its security team, and denied the latter. But in cases where the company truly needed a spotless record, Emily Baker-White’s reporting suggested that there was something to be afraid of here after all. Three, when it came to China, TikTok always stayed in kayfabe. Pardon my use of a term from pro wrestling here, but it’s the only one that fits. In wrestling, kayfabe is the agreed-upon reality that enables spectators to suspend their disbelief while watching events with scripted outcomes. For TikTok, kayfabe was the system that forced executives to say with a straight face that they have meaningful independence from ByteDance and would never agree to share data with the Chinese state. Here’s what Chew told lawmakers on that subject today:
In kayfabe, then, TikTok is an independent app that is not “beholden to the Chinese government.” And in reality, here’s what a spokeswoman for China’s Commerce Ministry said about the possibility of forced divestiture: “If the news is true, China will firmly oppose it.” As this whole drama has unfolded, I have been waiting for the moment when someone at TikTok would level with us — would say yes, China does make various demands of our parent company, and decides our future, and this is awkward but we are doing our best to address it in these ways. The fact that no one there ever said that gave the strong impression that they couldn’t say that — and in a low-trust environment, that sort of thing breeds suspicions that are difficult to overcome. Of course, had Chew dared to acknowledged China’s power, that also could have roiled US lawmakers. (To say nothing of the Chinese state, which all but chased ByteDance founder Zhang Yiming into hiding in 2021 for reasons that were never fully explained.) But at the very least it would have allowed for a more honest discussion. Four, TikTok really reckoned with the fact that ranked feeds often make people feel uneasy, or even bad. In fairness, none of the social companies have figured out a solution to this problem. But I think it dampened support for TikTok broadly, and it’s a reason we haven’t seen users marching in the streets to oppose a ban. (At least not yet.) Here’s a statistic that helps capture that. In a recent Post survey, 17 percent of daily TikTok users — nearly one in five — said they would support a ban. For people who use the app at least monthly, support for a ban came in at 21 percent. How else to explain that, if not a deep concern that using the app so much is not good for us? TikTok does appear to be waking up to this problem — it added a dedicated feed of science and math videos, just in time for Chew to promote it to lawmakers today. But that basic unease persists. And so users sit on their hands, even as the prospect of other apps being banned has triggered protests around the world. (Uber, another app that is at perpetual risk of being banned, does a better job getting drivers and riders to take to the streets.) Finally, TikTok never really got older people to use it. In particular, it struggled to get members of Congress to use it. The Post reported that just one member of today’s committee — Rep. Tony Cárdenas (D-CA) — has an active, verified TikTok account. (Two others appear to have deleted theirs.) It’s easy to ban an app you never use, particularly when you can do it in the name of national security. I suspect that were Facebook or Twitter owned by a Chinese company, Congress would feel much more motivated to find a solution that let them continuing to use their accounts for promotion and fundraising. We still don’t know what TikTok’s final disposition could be. It seems possible that it could outlast the Biden administration through the sheer force of inertia, just as it outlasted Trump. But if this indeed proves to be the moment Congress comes together to regulate a big tech platform, TikTok’s days may be truly numbered. And while it may be the case that nothing could have saved a China-based app in a moment like this, it’s also true that, in some important ways, TikTok brought all this on itself. PushbackIn Tuesday’s email edition, I accidentally said that Google executive walked me through “Claude’s development.” Several of you immediately pointed out that Google developed Bard, not Claude, which was in fact developed by Anthropic. I corrected the post online and have felt very silly about it ever since! But thanks for pointing it out. On the podcast this week: I put Google Bard through its paces, listeners describe for us all the ways they’re using generative AI, and Kevin and I debate how much we should use Spotify’s AI DJ now that it’s better than most of the company’s playlists. Apple | Spotify | Stitcher | Amazon | Google Governing
Industry
Those good tweetsFor more good tweets every day, follow Casey’s Instagram stories. if you haven’t yet today pleaseeeee make sure you get in your hours and hours of screen time. you are your phone’s entire life. it misses you ♥️♥️🫶🏼🫶🏼 always remember this I hate when one of your airpods steals all the nutrients from the other one in the womb so now it’s like L 87% R 3% Talk to usSend us tips, comments, questions, and your favorite TikToks while you still can: casey@platformer.news and zoe@platformer.news. By design, the vast majority of Platformer readers never pay anything for the journalism it provides. But you made it all the way to the end of this week’s edition — maybe not for the first time. Want to support more journalism like what you read today? If so, click here: |
Key phrases
Older messages
TikTok nears the endgame
Friday, March 17, 2023
Breaking off TikTok from ByteDance might be the right thing to do — but it will come at a high cost. PLUS: How Twitter keeps competitors off its For You page
Microsoft just laid off one of its responsible AI teams
Tuesday, March 14, 2023
As the company accelerates its push into AI products, the ethics and society team is gone
Meta is building a decentralized, text-based social network
Friday, March 10, 2023
Is this the Twitter replacement we've been waiting for?
How a single engineer brought down Twitter on Monday
Monday, March 6, 2023
The high cost of cutting expenses
Winners and losers in the race to add AI
Friday, March 3, 2023
ChatGPT is now running inside Snapchat, Notion, and other apps. Will it give them a sustaining advantage — or just line OpenAI's pockets?
You Might Also Like
We tested 7 AI image generators – with results
Friday, May 3, 2024
Plus tips, news & Buffer updates for your social media journey Image Hey there 👋🏾 If you've ever struggled with consistency in your content creation journey, you're not alone. I'
Paris’ je ne sais quant
Friday, May 3, 2024
Alice & Bob's quantum labs, Dubai's European founders & Goldman Sachs funds payments fintech View in browser Sponsor Card - Flagship-16 Good morning there, Many startups build their
How Texas’ online porn law could shatter a First Amendment precedent
Friday, May 3, 2024
After the Supreme Court declined to issue a stay this week, 20 years of court rulings may be about to go out the window Platformer Platformer How Texas' online porn law could shatter a First
Can Ambition Take You To The Moon?
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Yes, with some other ingredients ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏ ͏
SaaSHub Weekly - May 02
Thursday, May 2, 2024
SaaSHub Weekly - May 02 Featured and useful products HackerRank logo HackerRank HackerRank is a platform that allows companies to conduct interviews remotely to hire developers and for technical
"i had a dream I was laid off"
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Read time: 1 min, 10 sec My friend Kevin is one of the most successful people I know. He works for one of the FAANG tech companies and he makes $300K+/year. We were driving in the car yesterday, and in
AI strategies for healthcare
Thursday, May 2, 2024
where major players are making moves, and what it means for the future of the space Hi there, AI is on executive brains. And major healthcare players are making their moves in the space. From Eli
🔴 Afraid to quit your 9-5?
Thursday, May 2, 2024
you need to see this Dear , Is fear stopping you from leaving your 9-5 and following your passion? Here's a roadmap to overcome it: Educate Yourself: Fear comes from a lack of thorough knowledge.
[SaaS Club] How a Founder's Perseverance Built a 7-Figure SaaS
Thursday, May 2, 2024
The SaaS Club Newsletter Hey Reader Here's a quick round up of what's been going on at SaaS Club: In this week's newsletter: Dreamdata's $1M ARR journey—perseverance pays Boopos: Buy or
📂 Pick an initial price to learn from
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Today's newsletter is proudly supported by Embarque 🎉 For two years in a row, SaaS founders and marketers reported content as the #1 driver of growth according to the State of SaaS