The Altruism Trap: How Self-Sacrifice Stymies Progress
The idea of prioritizing the happiness of others over your own is a widely admired value. Seeking to live your life the way you want is “selfish” and “immoral”, according to this philosophy. Simply giving is not sufficient; you must be willing to sacrifice even what you do not have an abundance of. According to altruism, there are only two means to achieve any end in life: (1) sacrifice yourself for others or (2) compel them to sacrifice for you. In every act, you must consider the collective over yourself; that is morality. However, if we delve deeper into the implications of this premise—that “the key to happiness is sacrificing your own happiness for the happiness of others”—a paradox emerges when we consider its universal application. If everyone followed this principle, it would result in a scenario where no one would be happy. This contradiction exposes a fundamental flaw in the altruistic doctrine, as it inadvertently advocates to help precisely the people it deems immoral within its own philosophical framework since, ultimately, only those who are selfish can benefit from the acts of selfless people. A world where everyone prioritizes solving others’ problems rather than their own is impractical and counterproductive. The pervasive idea that sacrifice is virtuous leads to moralistic endeavors that cause more problems than they solve. Being selfish does not mean being insensitive, nor does being altruistic imply kindness or generosity. Altruism involves putting others’ needs above your own, creating a zero-sum situation, while selfishness—focused on one’s welfare, prosperity, and happiness—leads to win-win scenarios. Acting in one’s own self-interest allows for mutual benefit, distinct from heartlessness. However, the term “selfishness” has become laden with moralistic connotations, often leading to resistance from people and hindering open, error-correcting discussions. Some people, moralizing their stance, view any opposition to their ideas as a complete disregard for all lives, even if the counterargument could lead to a better outcome for more people. They neglect to understand that moralizing in itself is not an argument. For instance, if one disagrees with a minimum wage law, moralizers in favor of state intervention will equate that to “greed” and “selfishness” and consequently call out that person as “immoral”. That claim lacks any explanation. It is entirely vacuous, yet it is very appealing to many people. Moralizing makes it harder for ideas to be corrected and is always a mistake. People pursuing their interests achieve progress more rapidly than those suppressing their inclinations for perceived moral obligations. Choosing a career solely for its promised positive impact, against one’s genuine interests, often leads to personal struggle and, ironically, increased suffering. The key to faster progress—beneficial for everyone—is tackling problems that interest you, not acting out of “obligation”. Diverting resources from their optimal use to less effective areas under the guise of moral duty ultimately harms more people than it ever helps. Follow me on X: @arjunkhemani Click here to support my work. P.S. Logan Chipkin sparked many of the ideas in this post during our conversations together. Check out his Substack. |
Older messages
#116 – The Religion of Science
Sunday, October 8, 2023
Addressing a form of zealotry that is cloaked in the guise of science.
#115 – The Myth of the Compromise
Sunday, October 1, 2023
The notion of compromise often receives praise as a virtuous middle ground, a means for rationally resolving conflicts and maintaining harmony. It is the balanced solution where everyone gets a little
#114 – Conversations About Economic Illiteracy and Critical Rationalism
Sunday, September 24, 2023
Interviews with Per Bylund and Tom Hyde.
#113 – The real culprit of consumerism
Sunday, September 17, 2023
Ironically, behavior induced by government intervention gets labeled as “consumerism”, yet the blame often erroneously falls on capitalism and free markets.
#112 – Creativity and personhood
Sunday, September 10, 2023
We must defend the freedom of the mind to be creative at all costs.
You Might Also Like
🎙️ Find That Pod #260
Friday, May 3, 2024
Check out these 5 great podcasts...and bring some awesomeness to your ears. Let's take a look at this week's recommendations. ADVERTISEMENT 5 great podcasts to discover… Welcome to the 260th
Around the Newsletter Universe (May Edition)
Friday, May 3, 2024
feed your inbox.
Where do you start?
Friday, May 3, 2024
We have 4 updates for you this week: 1. Where do you start improving your website? Congrats you want to improve your website performance. Everyone has their ideas on where to start. Your competitors
📌 Double Days Sale 📌 Promo Pins for Authors for a Limited Time
Friday, May 3, 2024
Advertise on Pinterest boards that get thousands of views/month Enable Images to See This PINTEREST PROMOS FOR AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS Enable Images to See This $30 for 30 Days of Pins! & ORDER BY
🎤 SWIPES Email (Friday May 3rd, 2024)
Friday, May 3, 2024
The SWIPES Email Edition: Friday, May 3rd, 2024 An educational (and fun) email by Copywriting Course. Enjoy! 🎤 Listen to this email here: Swipe: You know your Uncle Neville, he loves a good
Community Seats for Mai 2024 to Juli 2024
Friday, May 3, 2024
50 % off the Regular Price — Thank you for Being a Subscriber!
Don’t Do These 5 Things
Friday, May 3, 2024
How many of these things will you stop doing?
👷♂️ He scaled a business with 4-ton metal boxes
Thursday, May 2, 2024
We could hardly contain ourselves with this shipping container story… This Bob is building a BIG shipping container business Hey Contrarians, 5 years ago, Robert "Bob" Balderas made a U-turn
3-2-1: Simple ways to be at peace, the source of reputation, and finding unfair advantages
Thursday, May 2, 2024
3 ideas, 2 quotes, and 1 question to consider this week.
Ahrefs’ Digest #181: Why big companies make bad content, and more
Thursday, May 2, 2024
Our meme of the week: 📰 News & updates Google March 2024 core update is done: It actually finished on April 19th but Google didn't tell anyone until one week later. Google Publisher Center to