Popular Information - The right-wing uproar about Title IX
A handful of billionaires are tightening their grip on the information ecosystem.
Popular Information takes on the powerful, and we've proven this approach can have a real impact. The billionaires consolidating their power are increasingly hostile to our work. That's why we need your help. Popular Information has 320,000 readers, but only a small percentage are paid subscribers. If more readers upgrade to paid, Popular Information can invest in alternative growth strategies, reach more people, and produce more groundbreaking accountability journalism. Support from readers like you keeps Popular Information paywall-free and available to everyone — whether or not they can afford to pay for news. So, if you can, please upgrade your subscription. It's $6 per month or $50 for a year. Thanks, Judd For the last 50 years, Title IX has had an extraordinary impact on the nature of higher education in the United States. Passed in 1972 as an amendment to the Higher Education Act, Title IX prohibits sex-based discrimination at any school that receives funding from the federal government. The law ensures that colleges and universities are open and welcoming to women. Since Title IX's passage, the percentage of female college students has increased from 42% to 58%. Last month, the Biden administration released a significant update to the Department of Education regulations that guide colleges on how to implement Title IX. The new rules are over 1,500 pages long, but the biggest change is the expansion of the regulation's protections against discrimination and harassment. The rules now explicitly prohibit discrimination and harassment on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. The legal basis for this expansion is the Supreme Court's 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. Justice Neil Gorsuch, one of the court's conservative members, wrote the majority decision in the case. Gorsuch found that Title VII prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. Like Title IX, the text of Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on "sex." But Gorsuch, in a decision that was also joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, found that discrimination because of gender identity or sexual orientation always involves sex discrimination. Therefore, discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation violates Title VII.
The Bostock decision does not expressly consider Title IX, which wasn't at issue in that case. But since Bostock, other federal courts have ruled that Title IX extends to gender identity and sexual orientation. Further, the Department of Education notes that "the statutory prohibitions against sex discrimination in Title VII and Title IX are similar," so it is appropriate to look at Bostock to determine the appropriate scope of Title IX. The primary impact of the new Title IX regulations is that trans students would be permitted to use the bathrooms that match their gender identity, and "school staff will be compelled to call trans and non-binary students by their preferred names and pronouns." The new regulations do not address the controversial issue of participation in women's athletics, which is being considered in a separate rulemaking. Meanwhile, right-wing politicians, activists, and media outlets are casting the new rules as "a grave threat to the safety and opportunities of women and girls." 15 states sue to protect the right to discrimination against LGBTQ people on campusWithin a few days of the new Title IX rules being finalized, several Republican Attorneys General filed lawsuits seeking to block the rules from going into effect on August 1. As of today, 15 states have filed four lawsuits against the federal government over the changes to Title IX implementation. The lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) claims that Bostock does not "allow" the Department of Education to find that a prohibition against sex discrimination includes a prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This is clearly false. The Bostock ruling explicitly declines to interpret Title IX and other statutes. A separate lawsuit, filed by the Attorneys General of Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, and West Virginia, acknowledges that Bostock "expressly declined to 'prejudge' whether its decision…would 'sweep beyond Title VII' to laws such as Title IX." That lawsuit, which is over 800 pages long, relies on the interpretation of Bostock by the Department of Education under Trump and a handful of post-Bostock cases that argue that Title IX does not extend to sexual orientation or gender identity. It also claims that the new Title IX rule will impact athletics, even though the text of the rule excludes athletics. GOP officials instruct schools to ignore the federal governmentThe lawsuits challenging the new Title IX rule were only filed days ago, and all the cases are still pending. The lawsuits seek to put the rule on hold, but no injunction has been issued. Nevertheless, several Republican officials are instructing schools in their state to ignore the federal government. Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen (R) "announced that Nebraska will not comply with the Biden administration’s new rules for Title IX." In a statement, Pillen said that the state "must fight against radical gender ideology and vigorously protect the rights of Nebraska women and girls." In Oklahoma, State Superintendent Ryan Walters (R) described the rule change as "unconstitutional and illegal" and warned schools to "completely ignore" the new federal regulation. Walters accused "Biden and his posse [of] eradicating women’s rights and putting women in danger." In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis (R) accused Biden of "undermining opportunities for girls and women, violating parents' rights, and abusing his constitutional authority," adding "[w]e will not comply." Of course, state officials are not responsible for deciding whether federal regulations are unconstitutional. That is up to the court system. Regardless, states are free to ignore these rules but if they do so, their educational institutions could lose federal funding. "Attempting to erase women as a category"Right-wing advocacy groups and news outlets have framed the new rules as an attack on parents, women, and students. Among those who criticized the new rules is Moms for Liberty. The right-wing group claims, without evidence, that “[t]he new Title IX regulations are unconstitutional, erase women and girls, eliminate due process, compel speech, and strip parents of their fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their child including decisions regarding their education, medical care, morality, and religion.” In an interview with Fox News, Moms for Liberty Co-Founder Tiffany Justice lamented that the changes will “supersede” the group's efforts to stop “the teaching of gender ideology and sexual orientation instruction in schools.” In a letter to Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona, a coalition of organizations led by Parents Defending Education argued the new rules “put the rights, safety, and basic dignity of all students at risk.” It also noted that the new rules “will mean the end to sex-separated sports,” even though the regulation does not extend to athletics. Meanwhile, Independent Women’s Forum, a dark money group with ties to the Koch network, announced it was filing a lawsuit against the Biden Administration over its “Illegal Title IX Rewrite.” The group, which spent $6 million on anti-trans messaging in the 2022 midterms, said Biden lacked the “legal authority” to make the changes and was “impos[ing] a woke agenda.” Alliance Defending Freedom, an anti-abortion group, said it “plans to take action to defend female athletes, as well as school districts, teachers, and students who will be gravely harmed by this unlawful government overreach.” The Daily Wire has also run several stories on the topic, suggesting Biden has “abolished Title IX” and teachers will begin mass-reporting parents “who object to schools that socially transition their children.” Similarly, Libs of TikTok has baselessly claimed that the new changes are “allowing males to invade female sports” and that Biden is “attempting to erase women as a category in this country.” You are currently on the free list for Popular Information. To support this work and enjoy the full experience, upgrade to paid. |
Older messages
Congressman praises racist heckling. Will his corporate backers stand by him?
Monday, May 6, 2024
On Thursday, Jaylin Smith, a graduate student at the University of Mississippi, participated in a small, non-violent protest calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. Smith and the other protesters were greeted
Rattling the cages of the powerful
Friday, May 3, 2024
In March 2020, I took down Popular Information's paywall. Since then, each edition of Popular Information (791 newsletters!) has been freely available to everyone. Over the last four years, we'
Immigrants are saving the American economy
Thursday, May 2, 2024
In his 2024 campaign, like his previous campaigns, Trump is pitting native-born Americans against immigrants. Sometimes, this is expressed through rank bigotry. Trump has claimed repeatedly that
Trump backs surveillance and prosecution of women to enforce abortion bans
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
As part of an extensive interview with Time Magazine, former President Donald Trump expanded on what abortion access would look like in the United States in a potential second term. Trump laid out a
The biggest political deception of 2024
Tuesday, April 30, 2024
In the 2024 presidential election, one of the central attacks that Trump and his political allies are levying against Biden is that Biden is responsible for a "migrant crime" wave. The
You Might Also Like
How to Keep Providing Gender-Affirming Care Despite Anti-Trans Attacks
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Using lessons learned defending abortion, some providers are digging in to serve their trans patients despite legal attacks. Most Read Columbia Bent Over Backward to Appease Right-Wing, Pro-Israel
Guest Newsletter: Five Books
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Five Books features in-depth author interviews recommending five books on a theme Guest Newsletter: Five Books By Sylvia Bishop • 9 Mar 2025 View in browser View in browser Five Books features in-depth
GeekWire's Most-Read Stories of the Week
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Catch up on the top tech stories from this past week. Here are the headlines that people have been reading on GeekWire. ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Revisit defining moments, explore new
10 Things That Delighted Us Last Week: From Seafoam-Green Tights to June Squibb’s Laundry Basket
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Plus: Half off CosRx's Snail Mucin Essence (today only!) The Strategist Logo Every product is independently selected by editors. If you buy something through our links, New York may earn an
🥣 Cereal Of The Damned 😈
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Wall Street corrupts an affordable housing program, hopeful parents lose embryos, dangers lurk in your pantry, and more from The Lever this week. 🥣 Cereal Of The Damned 😈 By The Lever • 9 Mar 2025 View
The Sunday — March 9
Sunday, March 9, 2025
This is the Tangle Sunday Edition, a brief roundup of our independent politics coverage plus some extra features for your Sunday morning reading. What the right is doodling. Steve Kelley | Creators
☕ Chance of clouds
Sunday, March 9, 2025
What is the future of weather forecasting? March 09, 2025 View Online | Sign Up | Shop Morning Brew Presented By Fatty15 Takashi Aoyama/Getty Images BROWSING Classifieds banner image The wackiest
Federal Leakers, Egg Investigations, and the Toughest Tongue Twister
Sunday, March 9, 2025
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Friday that DHS has identified two “criminal leakers” within its ranks and will refer them to the Department of Justice for felony prosecutions. ͏ ͏ ͏
Strategic Bitcoin Reserve And Digital Asset Stockpile | White House Crypto Summit
Saturday, March 8, 2025
Trump's new executive order mandates a comprehensive accounting of federal digital asset holdings. Forbes START INVESTING • Newsletters • MyForbes Presented by Nina Bambysheva Staff Writer, Forbes
Researchers rally for science in Seattle | Rad Power Bikes CEO departs
Saturday, March 8, 2025
What Alexa+ means for Amazon and its users ADVERTISEMENT GeekWire SPONSOR MESSAGE: Revisit defining moments, explore new challenges, and get a glimpse into what lies ahead for one of the world's