Twitt–, I mean X, has some new feature called “Grok.”

Dorks.

Every decision Elon makes leads me to think, “Lemme guess: There were zero women in the room when this was decided.”

I imagine the conference room at X looking like this scene from “Weird Science”:

It has me craving someone with a uterus in charge of stuff (even if she is a childless cat lady).

RFK Jr.'s dead bear, the Fargo VP, & childless cat ladies

Matt Ruby · Aug 6

Croaky and the Bear

Read full story

And now Musk is suing an ad industry group over an alleged advertising “boycott.”

Brilliant business genius Elon Musk: "I told advertisers to go f– themselves and yet they still don't like me?”
X CEO Linda Yaccarino: “Correct.”
Musk: “I know, let’s sue them! That'll bring 'em around!"
Yaccarino: “I don’t think that wi–”
Musk: “Done. You’re making the announcement.”
Yaccarino: “Ugh. Do I have to?”
Musk: “Yes. And I’ll be right off camera glaring at you so you better sell it.”
Yaccarino: “OK, but I’m gonna make a bunch of insane hand motions.”
Musk: [sniffs Ketamine]

At this point, I'm convinced Yaccarino is sticking around just to get more ammo for the eventual tell-all book she is definitely gonna publish.

Reminder to these supposed champions of free speech:

BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE SPEECH. BOYCOTTS ARE FREE–

If you’re gonna Libertarian, ya gotta go all the way with it. The ACLU: "From the Boston Tea Party to the Montgomery bus boycott to the boycott of apartheid South Africa, politically motivated consumer boycotts have long been part and parcel of American politics protected by the First Amendment.”

But look, we all know Elon's real policy (as demonstrated below): “Free speech for me, censorship for you.”

I’ve written this a gazillion times but it still seems to be a cosmic mystery to these folks so…

Free speech inherently leads to hate speech and other gross stuff. Tragedy of the commons and all that. Advertisers don’t like having their brands next to hate speech. If you wanna run a biz based on advertising revenue, play ball and keep things clean. If you wanna play free speech hero, make something people are willing to pay for. But you can’t bully advertisers into spending money to do something they believe is bad for their brand. And you definitely shouldn’t tell them to “go f– themselves” if they refuse to go along with your foolishness.

Basically, Disney doesn’t wanna have Little Mermaid ads next to N*zi stuff. You’d think a genius would be able to grok that.

Related:

Elon Musk thinks he's Iron Man when he's actually Michael Scott

Matt Ruby · December 5, 2023

You can’t script a cringe comedy moment any better than this scene at the Dealbook conference:

Read full story