Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Long before he officially pursued the presidency, Donald Trump railed against US trade deals. In interviews dating back to the 1980s, he told journalists that deals that benefited Asian and Middle Eastern trading partners consistently “ripped off” the US.

Over decades, that charge may have turned into a winning election strategy. As a first-term president and in his 2024 campaign, Trump argued that a lopsided global trading system is not only responsible for a deficit between the US and China, but also behind a decline in American manufacturing and jobs.

Now, Trump has made a second-term promise to raise tariffs — the taxes on imported goods that must be paid when they enter the US — even higher on China and other countries, while resurrecting those jobs.

But footwear, apparel, and auto-part companies say they expect to pass the cost of such tariffs on to American consumers. Yale University’s Budget Lab projects that Trump’s proposed tariffs would cost the average American household up to $7,600 a year with initial price hikes as high as 5 percent. Those higher costs could potentially backfire on the president-elect’s campaign promise to make inflation “vanish completely.”

Trump’s trade strategy is one that Greg Ip, chief economics commentator at the Wall Street Journal, says is a major departure from almost 80 years of US policy. In a conversation with Noel King, co-host of theToday, Explained podcast, Ip described how it might play out and have massive implications for the global economy. In today's newsletter, we've got an excerpt of their conversation, edited for length and clarity. 

There’s much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Pandora.

—Haleema Shah, producer, Today Explained podcast, and Noel King, co-host and editorial director

Noel King: Trade is a reality of economic life these days. What is Trump’s theory on it and how does it differ from his predecessors?

Greg Ip: In the United States, since the 1940s at least, there’s been a bipartisan consensus that more trade is good. And this came from a bipartisan view that this made our workers more productive, because they had bigger markets to sell into. It benefited our consumers because they got cheaper goods and a greater variety of goods. And it was also good for the US geopolitically because it helped us increase our economic bonds to countries that thought the same way we did, politically.

Trump comes along and he argues: This entire regime has been much more to the advantage of other countries than it has been to the United States. Countries like Japan and then Germany and now China have taken advantage of the United States’s fixation on free trade to increase their trade surplus with the US, sell us lots of manufactured goods, and not buy very much from the United States. So his entire mission, from his first term, and now into this one, is to reverse that relationship and, he hopes, force those countries to buy more from the US, and Americans to buy more from each other instead of from importers. That’s the theory, anyway.

Donald Trump had a chance to do all of this from 2016 to 2020 when he was in office. What did he do?

He did raise tariffs, for example, in a series of rounds of tariff increases. He imposed tariffs on a wide range of products from China. And this was pursuant to a long-running case that complained that China was just systematically unfair to the United States, stealing our technology and putting up barriers to US exports to China. Then he imposed a variety of more bespoke tariffs on particular products.

So at the end of that first term … had Donald Trump gotten what he wanted? Had his plan worked?

If the test of Donald Trump’s trade policy was a smaller trade deficit, then no, he didn’t really achieve what he wanted. The trade deficit when he left office was larger in dollar terms than when he entered office.

Did some manufacturing jobs come back? Possibly. But there also appear to have been some costs. There were industries that had to pay more for their inputs because of tariffs, and they lost sales and possibly jobs. And some of our trading partners retaliated.

Our trade deficit with China did begin to shrink. At the same time, though, you saw our trade deficit with Mexico and Vietnam grow. And what that told us is that some businesses responded to Trump’s tariffs not necessarily by bringing production back to the United States, but by moving it to another country — out of China, into Vietnam, into Mexico — that were not quite as affected by the tariffs.

What are Donald Trump’s plans for a second term?

He wants to, number one, come down even harder on China. Instead of just putting tariffs on about half of China’s imports, he’s talked about a tariff on all Chinese imports of as much as 60 percent. And instead of sparing traditional US allies, he wants to impose an across-the-board tariff on everybody, of say, 10 to 20 percent.

But there’s a very big caveat to this, which is that we don’t really know if Trump will end up doing exactly what he’s talked about.

We know that Trump likes tariffs, but we also know that Trump likes to make deals. So, as in his first term, we might see that the threat of tariffs is primarily a leverage instrument — you know, a negotiating chip — in which he goes to countries that he thinks treat the United States unfairly and says, “Here are some things we want you to do differently. And if you do as we ask, then we won’t hit you with the tariffs that I’ve talked about.”

How close can Donald Trump come to really and truly changing the way the world does trade?

It’s possible that Trump presses ahead with exactly what he said, raises tariffs on everybody, and then all those countries retaliate. They export less to us, we export less to them, trade shrinks, and everybody is worse off.

There’s another possibility here, which is that a lot of folks in the United States and in other countries say, “You know, he’s right. The trading system was fundamentally good, but it went off the rails at some point. We need to get together. We need to remake that thing.” So I think another possibility is that we end up a few years from now with a different trading system, and perhaps a more realistic view of how China, above all — but some other countries, [too] — have not been playing by the rules.

But I think, as we learned from his first term, one thing with Donald Trump — you can be sure of this — is that you should expect the unexpected.

Joey Sendaydiego/Vox

$148 billion in gifts were returned last year: According to the National Retail Federation’s estimate on 2024 gift giving patterns. Worried about giving the wrong thing this year? Here’s a guide on how to avoid being a bad gift-giver —  and what to do with the gifts you don’t want or need.

A sea creature “as large as two basketball courts”: A team of researchers and filmmakers exploring the Solomon Islands have found what they claim is the world’s largest individual coral colony. Given its massive size and the slow speed at which corals grow, the coral is likely several centuries old.

Trump’s “Project 2025” Cabinet picks, explained: While the president-elect has previously denied interest in the policy recommendations published by the controversial right-wing think tank the Heritage Foundation, nearly half of the co-authors and editors of the report served in his first administration. Now, Trump has nominated Brendan Carr to head the Federal Communications Commission, and Tom Homan as his “border czar.” Both have connections to Project 2025.

What Americans rejected this election cycle: The Democratic Party’s political reckoning may be just beginning. Our reporter on the evolving nature of conservatism went on The Gray Area to discuss why President-elect Donald Trump gained ground with most demographics besides college-educated women, and what comes next.

We’re the Costco Guys. Of course we have a MAGA-adjacent fan base: Are you familiar with characters such as A.J., Big Justice, and the Rizzler? If not, it’s a reminder that the internet is split into two Americas. The Costco Guys are a father-son TikTok duo who may or may not belong to the “bro internet,” depending on who you ask. We explain their viral success here.

Testimony against former Rep. Matt Gaetz: Two women have reported to the House Ethics Committee that Gaetz, Trump’s pick for attorney general, paid them for “sexual favors.” One of the women also claimed that she saw Gaetz have sex with an underage girl in 2017. [CNN]

Putin’s new nuclear doctrine: In a warning to the United States, Russian President Vladimir Putin has lowered the threshold for a nuclear strike in response to attacks. [Reuters]

AFP via Getty Images

Many Americans appear to be losing faith in vaccines. It’s a worrying trend that could continue if President-elect Donald Trump succeeds in making Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine denier, the head of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Vaccine safety has been extensively studied — and the negative effects Kennedy claims remain undetected. The chart above shows how diseases like smallpox, polio, measles, and other infectious diseases have been effectively eradicated due to the advancement of vaccine technology.

Experts fear that Kennedy's appointment will increase ambivalence toward these vital public health measures. You can read more about how vaccines have improved our society here.

Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can sign up for it right here. 

And as always, we want to know what you think. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know by filling out this form or just replying to this email. 

Today’s edition was produced and edited by senior editor Lavanya Ramanathan, with contributions from Haleema Shah and Noel King. We'll see you tomorrow!

Become a member to support fearless, independent election coverage.

This email was sent to you. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution.

View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service.

Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.