This is Tangle: an independent, nonpartisan, subscriber-supported politics newsletter that summarizes the best arguments from across the political spectrum on the news of the day.

Are you new here? Get free emails to your inbox daily. Would you rather listen? You can find our podcast here.


Today's read: 2 minutes.

🌱
Reminder: Tangle is not publishing its standard newsletter this week, but we'll be sharing new podcast content featuring exclusive interviews with a range of political commentators. We will return with our normal newsletter on Monday, March 31.

*If you don't want ads, you can subscribe to our ad-free newsletter here.


Dear readers,

Managing Editor Ari Weitzman here.

I lived in California for four years. In that time, I left San Francisco because of wildfire smoke twice, helped plant trees in burn scars three times, and got a taste of the constant concerns over the pressure of cataclysm that native Californians have gotten used to. I say all that not to establish myself as an expert in California and its issues, just to say that when the Los Angeles wildfires broke out earlier this year, I saw the continuation of a story that had been underway for decades, if not millennia. 

One of the chapters in that story is housing. It’s no secret that constrained housing has been an issue plaguing U.S. cities, especially on the West Coast. That issue has bubbled up in public discourse several times in the past year, with a case on homeless encampments making it to the Supreme Court and narratives of immigrants squeezing the housing supply influencing the 2024 election

However, fewer people were connecting issues in the housing market to the California wildfires. One of the people making the case that the two were closely intertwined was Jack Nicastro, who wrote a piece in Reason Magazine about how California’s policy exacerbated the effects of the wildfires.

The piece gave a very cogent argument, and I knew I had to talk to him about it.

Like me, Jack is not a California native. The two of us aren’t authorities on Los Angeles. However, we’re both very interested in housing policy, the wild-urban interface, and perverse incentives of government regulation. I sat down to talk to Jack for 25 minutes about his article, and that conversation turned into a 45-minute nerd-fest over libertarian theory and the residential insurance markets.

You can find our conversation, along with all our podcasts, by going here

Reminder: If you are not yet a podcast member, and you want to upgrade your newsletter subscription plan to include a podcast membership (which gets you ad-free podcasts, Friday editions, The Sunday podcast, and bonus content), you can do that here. That page is a good resource for managing your Tangle subscription (just make sure you are logged in on the website!) 

Keep an eye out for more content coming tomorrow and Thursday.

Best,

Ari & the Tangle team


Don't forget...

📣 Share Tangle on Twitter here, Facebook here, or LinkedIn here.

🎧 We have a podcast you can listen to here.

🎥 Follow us on Instagram here or subscribe to our YouTube channel here

💵 If you like our newsletter, drop some love in our tip jar.

🎉 Want to reach 370,000+ people? Fill out this form to advertise with us.

📫 Forward this to a friend and tell them to subscribe (hint: it's here).

🛍 Love clothes, stickers and mugs? Go to our merch store!