Now I Know: The Swampy Loophole in the Georgia Constitution

Today is Election Day in the U.S. -- if you're eligible, please take a few minutes to vote. I did this morning and for the first time in recent memory, they had "I Voted" stickers, so that was nice.

Also, a few weeks ago, I explained that going forward, in an effort to reach more people, I'll be sending emails about sweepstakes you can enter. (Here's the backstory and explanation if you missed it.) That will start as early as later today. Thanks! -- Dan


The Swampy Loophole in the Georgia Constitution

In 1777, the U.S. state of Georgia adopted its first-ever state constitution. The document does what most constitutions do -- it outlines the structure of the state government, the process for making and enforcing laws, and the like. It has been revised a number of times over the last two-plus centuries, with most versions mostly following the language and rules set forth by the previous version. In 1861, though, coinciding with the state's decision to secede from the United States in an effort to maintain slavery, the state added a Bill of Rights to the document. That section -- now Article I, Section I of the Georgia State Constitution -- has remained mostly unchanged since, with two exceptions. First, in 1865 -- after the Civil War -- the state amended it to abolish slavery. And second, in 1877, they added the following language:

Paragraph XXI. Banishment and whipping as punishment for crime. Neither banishment beyond the limits of the state nor whipping shall be allowed as a punishment for crime.
It's very clear: if you commit a crime in Georgia, and the state convicts you and sentences you for punishment, that punishment can't include whipping, and it the courts can't banish you from the state. It's very straightforward. 

And yet, as recently as 2001, criminals have found themselves, effectively, banished from Georgia. The trick? They get sent to the swamp. Echols County, specifically.

Echols County is in the south of Georgia, bordering Florida (here's a map). Of the 159 counties in Georgia, Echols County is the 152nd least populous and number 155 by population density. It is very rural, with swampland occupying a lot of the region; according to American City and Country, it is "the only Georgia county without incorporated municipalities." (Even the county seat of Statenville unincorporated, and, perhaps descriptively, it was once named "Troublesome.") As of the 2010 census, nearly a third (32%) of its roughly 4,000 residents live below the poverty line. And that's an increase -- in the wrong direction -- from the 2000 census by about eight percentage points. As of 2001, per the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, it has "no restaurants, hotels, or banks" across its 412 square mile expanse. It's not a great place to go if you're looking for better jobs or other economic opportunities.

So if you're a criminal looking for a second chance, you probably don't want to move to Echols County. And that gives prosecutors and judges a tool that the state constitution probably didn't intend, but one that some law enforcement officials appreciate. In 2001, Kelly Burke, then a district attorney in Macon County, Georgia (150 or so miles from Echols) explained his perspective to the Los Angeles Times, "advocat[ing for] banishment as a positive alternative to prison that gives the offender a chance to start fresh."Per the Times, Burke was "particularly fond of banning drug dealers, saying it takes away the local customers and contacts they need to stay in business." And Article I, Section I, Paragraph XXI of the state constitution? Not a problem.

The state constitution, per the text above, bars "banishment beyond the limits of the state" -- again, that's clear. But those last five words -- "beyond the limits of the state" -- are important. Georgia courts have interpreted the clause to imply that if you want to banish criminals from part of the state, that's entirely fine. For example, in 1975, the state Supreme Court heard a case where a criminal defendant was banished from seven of the state's 159 counties; and held that "the sentence in the present case is within the broad definition of banishment as that term generally has been used." In other words, it's perfectly okay for the state to banish convicts from part of the state. 

So, every so often, that's what they do. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution explains why in a 2001 article:

Here's how it works. In a plea agreement, defendants are given the option to move from Georgia for a specified period instead of going to prison. Legally, the agreement bans the defendant from 158 of 159 counties, this skirting the state's constitutional banishment clause. The one-county exception, court officials, say, usually is Echols. The reason: Officials believe no one would actually move there.

And it seems like those officials are likely correct. In the second part of that Journal-Constitution article, John Petrey, then the chief district attorney for DeKalb County (about 250 miles from Echols) told the paper that "he has prosecutive more than 200 cases in which defendants were banished to Echols." But Olaph White, a retired sheriff in Echols told the paper that, as far as he knows, none of them showed up in his jurisdiction. Presumably, all of them left Georgia entirely.

Whether you think the loophole is just or not, it is likely not going away anytime soon. Just a decade ago, in 2011, the state courts upheld another de facto banishment using the same loophole (with a wider approved zone than Echols alone), and the state government has shown no interest in amending the constitution to account for the loophole.

Now I Know is supported by readers like you. Please consider becoming a patron by supporting the project on Patreon. 

Click here to pledge your support. (If you do, in gratitude, you'll have an ad-free Now I Know experience going forward.)

Bonus fact: Georgia was one of the first places in the United States to ban slavery - kind of. In 1733, a British Member of Parliament named James Oglethorpe established the colony of Georgia, hoping to make it a place for "the unemployed and the unemployable" -- that is, those who were currently poor but could make a liviing for themselves if given a fresh start. Seeing that slavery was inconsistent with that ambition, the colony explicitly banned slavery. But as Valdosta Today reports, that began to change quickly. Before the decade was out, "colonists, not content with the results they were seeing from their hard labor, argued that slaves were the only suitable method of achieving prosperity." It took another decade but that view ultimately gained a lot of popular support, and in 1751, Georgia lifted its ban on slavery and began bringing in enslaved Africans. By the end of the American Revolution, approximately 40% of Georgia's population were slaves.

From the Archives: The Barrier City: The tiny part of Georgia that existed for ridiculous reasons.
Like today's Now I Know? Share it with a friend -- just forward this email along.
And if someone forwarded this to you, consider signing up! Just click here.
Share Share
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Archives · Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Now I Know LLC, All rights reserved.
You opted in, at via a contest, giveaway, or the like -- or you wouldn't get this email.

Now I Know is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Some images above via Wikipedia.

Now I Know's mailing address is:
Now I Know LLC
P.O. Box 536
Mt. Kisco, NY 10549-9998

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your email address or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp

Key phrases

Older messages

Now I Know: The Costume That Was a Trick

Monday, November 1, 2021

No treats here, but maybe an insight into public safety? View this email in your browser · Missed one? Visit the Archives Sorry that this is hitting your inbox so late -- Halloween got the better of me

Now I Know: How To Get Rid of Lots of Old Books

Friday, October 29, 2021

Thanks to all of you for solving the problem! View this email in your browser · Missed an issue? Click here! How to Get Rid of Lots of Old Books Hi! Two weeks ago, I asked for your help: I had a lot of

Now I Know: "An Incredible Amount of Bananas"

Thursday, October 28, 2021

Also: Rice, Eggplant, and Dog Food View this email in your browser · Missed one? Visit the Archives Unexpectedly, due to some technical issues and my inability to read my calendar (those are unrelated)

Now I Know: The Odd Depths of Preserving Plutonium

Wednesday, October 27, 2021

If it didn't go that way, the plutonium really would have been Pu! View this email in your browser · Missed one? Visit the Archives I don't like the title of this one -- if you have any

Now I Know: Cook 'Em Horns!

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

A University of Texas tradition that takes an unusual turn -- and then has an even stranger ending View this email in your browser · Missed one? Visit the Archives This is a rerun from 2014, and a

Positive Accidents

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

On positive accidents, tackling life debt and powerful levers we can utilize. View in browser Positive Accidents Hi everyone, Happy belated Thanksgiving! Hope all of you enjoyed the festive cheer. This

How To Write Philosophy with Dr. Pamela Hieronymi

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

The “consulting philosopher” on The Good Place shares her process for thinking and writing ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Now I Know: Give Me Liberty or Give Me Triple Sevens

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

I just watched Ghostbuster 2 last weekend and really want to make a joke about it here, but I think it'd be lost on most of you. View this email in your browser · Missed one? Visit the Archives Hi!

Hurricane Larry

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

A short one this week. I wrote this in September right after Hurricane Larry. I spent the morning trying to trim and re-write it into a spot where it felt OK to share. Here it is. I spent a chunk hours

Apple Podcasts publishes the best of 2021

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

The company earning more from podcasts than Google paid search; and iVoox adds more exclusives 4.5 mins to read · Your daily briefing for podcasting and on-demand, with 20952 subscribers; issue #1178 ·

[Live Webinar] Structure your L&D team for ultimate success in 2022

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Hello , 2021 was all about keeping our heads above the water. From moving training from in-person to online to onboarding new hires remotely, L&D teams had to make snap decisions and do their best

LAST EMAIL: doors closing

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Last reminder then done → the Copywriting Course Cyber Monday deal is almost over… 55% off a full year of training and personalized help. Our most ridiculous deal ever, and it's going away in: $750

Narrative kindling

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Writing retreat updates, collecting story material, writing in present tense, Apple Notes tips, and NFTs for authors. Narrative kindling By Iain Broome – 30 Nov 2021 – View online → Day one of my

November's tail, day #35

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

Continuing our streak! 💪 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

360Learning - Our December Events Roundup!

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

If this email is not displayed correctly, click here 360Learning December Events Newsletter Let it snow. Let it snow. Let it snow! Hot chocolate by the fireplace, snowball fights, beautiful storefront