With the rapid rise of the cryptocurrency market, regulatory risks, especially those related to tax compliance, have become increasingly prominent. In April 2024, Roger Ver, known as "Bitcoin Jesus," was accused by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of evading $48 million in taxes and was arrested in Spain. For several months, the case has kept the cryptocurrency industry on edge, further highlighting the importance of tax compliance within the sector.

As Bitcoin approaches $100,000, the "Bitcoin Jesus" case saw new developments last week. On December 4, 2024, Roger Ver's legal team filed a motion requesting the court to dismiss the IRS's tax evasion charges against him. He is currently awaiting extradition proceedings in Spain. In this article, TaxDAO will revisit the "Bitcoin Jesus" case and provide compliance advice regarding related tax risks.

1. The Story Behind the 'Bitcoin Jesus' Case

1.1 Who is Bitcoin Jesus?

Roger Ver, born in 1979 in Silicon Valley, is a well-known libertarian and anarchist. In 1999, while still in university, he founded Memory Dealers, a company focused on reselling computer parts. Later, he dropped out of college to run the business full-time, and by the age of 24, he had earned his first million dollars through his sharp business acumen.

In 2011, Roger Ver began investing in Bitcoin and announced that his company, Memory Dealers, would accept Bitcoin payments, becoming the first business in the world to do so. Since then, he has continued to buy and acquire large amounts of Bitcoin through both his personal holdings and his companies. He later became the CEO of Bitcoin.com and a founder of the Bitcoin Foundation. Roger Ver has actively promoted Bitcoin's application and value, helping drive its early adoption. Due to his contributions and influence in the cryptocurrency space, he earned the nickname "Bitcoin Jesus" from the media and the crypto community.

1.2 Why Did the IRS Sue Bitcoin Jesus?

In 2014, Roger Ver obtained citizenship in the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis and soon after renounced his U.S. citizenship. According to U.S. tax law, individuals who renounce their citizenship must fully disclose their global assets, including Bitcoin holdings and their fair market value, and report any capital gains. The IRS alleges that Roger Ver concealed and undervalued his personal assets before renouncing his U.S. citizenship. After renouncing his citizenship, he acquired and sold about 70,000 Bitcoins from companies he controlled in the U.S., generating nearly $240 million in revenue, thereby evading at least $48 million in taxes.

The IRS has made two primary allegations:

Failure to comply with exit tax regulations:

The IRS claims that Roger Ver understated the number of Bitcoins he and his companies held when renouncing U.S. citizenship, thus evading taxes owed under the exit tax provisions.

Violation of tax obligations as a non-U.S. tax resident: After renouncing his citizenship, Roger Ver allegedly failed to report income generated from the sale of Bitcoins held by companies he controlled in the U.S. In 2017, despite renouncing U.S. citizenship, he reportedly transferred Bitcoins held by his U.S.-based companies to his personal name without reporting the income, thus evading U.S. taxes.

2. Can Bitcoin Jesus "Redeem" Himself?

In the U.S., tax evasion is considered a serious crime, with penalties including up to five years in prison and fines of up to $100,000 for individuals or $500,000 for companies. Based on U.S. legal precedent, to successfully convict Roger Ver of tax evasion, the prosecution must prove three elements:

Substantial tax liability:

The prosecution must prove that Roger Ver has a significant tax debt. In his case, the $48 million in unpaid taxes is clearly substantial and exceeds the threshold for "significant" in U.S. judicial practice, making it difficult for Ver's defense team to argue otherwise.

Willful intent to evade taxes:

The prosecution must demonstrate that Roger Ver's actions were not accidental or negligent, but were intentional. For example, providing false information to appraisers or tax preparers, and failing to disclose key details about Bitcoin transactions, could serve as evidence of intent. There is still room for debate on this subjective element between the prosecution and defense.

Active concealment or deceptive actions:

The prosecution must prove that Roger Ver took proactive steps to conceal assets, underreport income, or deceive tax authorities. The indictment lists a series of specific actions Ver allegedly took, such as moving funds to offshore accounts, concealing Bitcoin transactions, and inflating asset expenses. These actions are considered "tax evasion" under U.S. tax law. If the evidence of these actions is deemed credible and lawful, it could significantly strengthen the prosecution’s case.

Reportedly, Roger Ver's legal team filed a motion on December 4, 2024, asking a federal judge to dismiss the tax evasion charges. They argue that U.S. tax law regarding cryptocurrency is unclear, making it difficult for taxpayers to understand their legal responsibilities. They also accuse the government of improper conduct in the prosecution, including selectively quoting and misrepresenting communications, as well as hiding evidence that could benefit the defendant. Furthermore, they argue that the IRS has engaged in selective enforcement, focusing only on high-profile figures like Roger Ver, rather than addressing similar cases in a fair and consistent manner.

The court has scheduled a hearing for February 2025 to review this motion.

The outcome of Roger Ver’s case is likely to be influenced by various legal and political factors. On the positive side, Ver’s defense team has highlighted ambiguities in tax law regarding cryptocurrency, which could serve as a potential loophole. They have also raised concerns about selective prosecution, which, if supported by evidence, could undermine the legitimacy of the IRS’s charges. Additionally, the Trump administration's stance on ending harsh cryptocurrency regulations may offer a political opening for Ver’s defense.

However, there are also significant challenges. The prosecution has substantial evidence, including the $48 million in unpaid taxes and a series of alleged tax evasion actions, which appear to meet the statutory requirements for tax evasion. If the court remains politically neutral, the key factors in the judgment will likely be the assessment of subjective intent and the admissibility of evidence. Ultimately, how these elements are evaluated may determine the case’s outcome.

3. Tax Risks in Crypto from the Bitcoin Jesus Case

The Bitcoin Jesus case has sounded an alarm for the cryptocurrency industry, particularly for individual investors in crypto assets, emphasizing the growing importance of tax compliance. Strengthened international cooperation and advancements in technology are narrowing the space for investors to evade taxes. For crypto participants, tax compliance has become an unavoidable issue.

3.1 Strengthened International Tax Cooperation and the Rising Difficulty of Offshore Tax Evasion

Roger Ver's decision to renounce his U.S. citizenship and become a citizen of Saint Kitts and Nevis was an attempt to leverage his offshore status to avoid U.S. tax obligations, a common tax avoidance strategy.

However, with the increasing strength of international tax cooperation, the ability to evade taxes via offshore identities has become significantly harder. Over 100 countries and regions have committed to joining the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), which enables the automatic exchange of financial tax information. This includes jurisdictions typically seen as "tax havens," such as the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas, the Cook Islands, and the Marshall Islands.

For example, IRS has increasingly focused on regulating such tax avoidance strategies, conducting investigations via international cooperation. Offshore individuals or companies, while using offshore identities to evade taxes, may still be deemed to have tax obligations if they maintain significant economic activity in the U.S. (such as company operations or client sources). Furthermore, if high-net-worth investors store assets in offshore wallets or transfer them to jurisdictions without tax cooperation agreements (e.g., certain tax havens), they may trigger reporting obligations for foreign assets. For instance, the FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) requires U.S. taxpayers to report global financial accounts, with failure to comply resulting in substantial penalties or even criminal charges.

3.2 Upgraded Blockchain Tracking Technology Reduces Tax Evasion

For high-net-worth Bitcoin investors like Roger Ver, one of the key concerns for tax authorities is whether they are accurately reporting capital gains tax during large asset sales.

Some high-net-worth investors might try to hide transactions using on-chain anonymity technologies or privacy coins (such as Monero and Zcash). However, with advancements in blockchain tracking technologies, this strategy has become much riskier. Technological progress has made blockchain transactions more transparent, and some tax authorities can now directly track on-chain data and analyze the flow of funds. In some jurisdictions, authorities have started collaborating with blockchain analytics firms to further limit tax evasion using crypto assets.

Additionally, some investors attempt to use complex transaction structures or multiple wallets to disperse assets in an effort to reduce tax disclosure and payment obligations. However, such actions are easily construed by tax authorities as willful tax evasion, which can result in legal risks. For example, transferring assets to multiple wallets or using complex cross-border transactions to conceal actual income sources could be considered tax evasion if discovered. In such cases, the investor will not only owe back taxes, but may also face fines or even criminal charges.

4. TaxDAO’s Tips and Recommendations

Despite the warnings provided by cases like Roger Ver's, some crypto investors may underestimate the efforts of tax authorities to track and enforce crypto asset taxation. While crypto assets have decentralized features, this does not mean investors can evade tax regulation. Failing to comply with tax obligations can lead to back taxes, fines, and even criminal litigation. To ensure compliance and avoid tax risks, investors in the crypto asset sector should take the following steps:

Acknowledge Tax Responsibilities and Raise Compliance Awareness：

Paying taxes is not only a legal obligation, but properly filing tax returns also serves as proof of the legitimacy of asset sources. Whether an individual or a company, investors should abandon the misconception that decentralization means they are exempt from taxes. Complying with tax laws reduces legal risks and increases trust from the public and regulatory authorities in their operations and financial situation.

Strengthen Tax Planning and Management to Prevent Sudden Risks:

Individual investors should develop a habit of regularly auditing their assets and income, recording all transactions and earnings data, and ensuring timely and accurate tax filings. They should also plan for capital gains and income taxes in advance to avoid extra pressure caused by late filings or audits. For companies, a systematic tax management framework should be established, including token distribution records, detailed revenue tracking, and transparent monitoring of cross-border financial flows, ensuring that every step of tax compliance is thorough and standard.

Stay Updated on Policy Changes and Adjust Investment Strategies:

Tax policies in the crypto asset sector are complex and subject to rapid changes, with significant differences in regulations across jurisdictions. Investors should stay informed about new tax regulations and international cooperation agreements, assessing their potential impact on investment activities. For instance, adjusting asset allocation or transaction structures in response to policy changes can help mitigate policy risks and ensure compliance.

Rely on Professional Support to Avoid Misunderstanding of Policies:

For high-net-worth investors or institutions involved in complex cross-border transactions, it is wise to work with professionals who are familiar with crypto asset tax regulations. Professional teams can provide comprehensive guidance on tax responsibilities and policy requirements, helping investors identify potential risks in advance. Especially when dealing with multiple jurisdictions, professional advice can help avoid compliance mistakes caused by misinterpreting policies.

By following these recommendations, investors can reduce the legal risks associated with tax non-compliance while achieving sustainable growth within a compliant framework. As tax policies continue to improve and regulations tighten, establishing a clear awareness of tax compliance is a necessary step for every crypto investor.

Follow us

Twitter: https://twitter.com/WuBlockchain

Telegram: https://t.me/wublockchainenglish