Every publisher should have a games strategy
Every publisher should have a games strategyBy deploying games products, publishers can significantly increase reader engagement and subscriber retention.
Hello there! This is the latest edition of my Q&A series where readers ask me questions and I do my best to answer them. But there’s a catch: while the answers are free to read, only the paying subscribers get to ask the questions. If you’re a paying subscriber who wants to ask a question for the next edition, you can leave it in this thread over here. And if you want to subscribe, the link below will get you 10% off for your first year. Not only will you be able to participate in these Q&A sessions, but you’ll be supporting the work I do for my newsletter and podcast. Ok, let’s jump into it… Every publisher should have a games strategyThe first question comes from Lee:
There’s an increasing body of evidence showing that, by deploying games products, publishers can significantly increase reader engagement and subscriber retention. Here are just a few examples:
I’ve seen enough case studies on this issue to convince me that most publishers should have some sort of games strategy. Some people will roll their eyes at this statement. After all, what would your average publisher know about game development, and how would they find the budget? But I think there’s low hanging fruit that’s accessible to just about every publisher: quizzes. What’s great about quizzes is that they can be customized across just about every content niche, and there are plenty of third party platforms that make it easy for you to create and embed a quiz on your website. Not only are they great for engagement, but they can also educate your audience about news stories they may have missed during the week. The most impressive publishers operating todayJez Walters asks:
Let me run through several of them:
Checking in on the various Substack competitorsFrom Terrell Johnson:
When Substack launched in 2017, it was truly a one-of-a-kind product, a platform that combined free email distribution, a nice web publishing interface, and paid monetization capabilities. For years, writers had wanted to replicate the successful paid newsletter strategies of analysts like Ben Thompson and Nick Quah, but they were intimidated by the technical and financial hurdles of doing so. Substack took all those hurdles away, and as a result rode a massive wave of positive buzz and press as high profile journalists started decamping to the platform. Of course all that buzz led to more competition as large tech companies and new startups tried to get in on the action. Now, there are several platforms playing in the newsletter monetization space, either by competing with Substack directly or by carving out specialized niches and services. There’s also been a veritable Substack backlash — partly to do with the politics of some of its top writers — which has led to some prominent members of the media community actively rooting against its success. That all being said, let’s look at the newsletter platform landscape and see how all these services stack up: Revue I gotta be honest, I thought Twitter had bigger ambitions for Revue. Upon acquiring the company, Twitter immediately made it free to use, which transformed Revue into a direct competitor to Substack. It also integrated an easy signup button into Twitter profiles so that followers no longer needed to leave the platform or confirm their subscriptions. And then…nothing. I haven’t seen any major product announcements from Revue for months, even though I think there are plenty of other synergies that can be leveraged. For instance, I was disappointed when Twitter’s new Super Follows subscription product didn’t integrate with Revue subscriptions. It just seemed like such an obvious combination. The same goes for its ticketed Spaces product. I recently experimented with sending out a newsletter on Revue and was unimpressed with its UI and presentation. I also haven’t noticed many high profile writers setting up camp on Revue. I feel like not a week goes by without someone publicly announcing they’ve reached 1,000 paying subscribers on Substack, but where are all the humblebrags on Revue? I’m just not seeing much activity. Bulletin Bulletin is the newsletter product developed by Facebook. It’s currently invite-only and has been slowly amassing an interesting mix of local and national writers by paying them some sort of advance. The team doesn’t seem to be in a hurry to open this up to the wider public, which I’ve argued is a good thing, since there are too many people out there rooting for Facebook to fail and who will try to capitalize on any missteps it makes. Bulletin’s success will depend on how well Facebook leverages its huge social graph in helping writers to build an audience. My guess is that the most successful Bulletin writers will be those who already have large followings on Facebook. Ghost Ghost is often namechecked as a direct Substack competitor, but it really isn’t. Instead of offering up free email distribution and charging a percentage of all paid subscriptions, it charges upfront fees that go up depending on the size of your email list. This makes it bad for newbie writers who are just starting out but great for already-established newsletters that don’t want to pay Substack’s 10% fees. In fact, several high profile Substack writers have decamped to Ghost exactly for that reason. Substack Substack hasn’t taken all this new competition lying down. Not only does it aggressively pursue high profile writers through its Substack Pro program — through which it offers them large cash advances — but it’s also had a robust product rollout schedule. I’m consistently impressed by how often it ships new features, and as a weekly user of the platform, I can only list a handful of changes I’d make to its offerings. And given that it just passed the threshold of 1 million paid users, it’s proved itself as a viable launching pad for bootstrapped media businesses. It’s earned its status as a major force within the Creator Economy. Did I not answer your question yet?Don’t worry! I plan to continue answering questions in future editions. Make sure to leave me a question in this thread if you haven’t already. And again, if you’re not yet a subscriber and want to join in on the fun, use the link below: Quick hits"Internally, Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger has begun to refer to the paper as having not one but four front pages: the print edition, the website, The Daily podcast hosted by Michael Barbaro, and The Morning [newsletter]." [New York] Top executives from Google, Condé Nast, Vox Media, and Quartz discuss their audience development strategies. [Medium] TikTok is starting to enter paid partnerships with media companies to produce exclusive content for the platform. [Digiday] Judd Legum is doing important work in tracking how highly partisan actors are manipulating Facebook's algorithm. [Popular Information] LinkedIn is launching a podcast network, though it's not clear how this really scales, since LinkedIn hasn't built out a platform for hosting and distributing podcasts. This is just an old-fashioned, invite-only network. [Insider] "As traffic diverts from breaking news coverage, other non-news verticals are seeing an uptick in interest from readers who are now willing to dedicate more time to hobbies and special interests." [Digiday] The Daily Beast is using a registration wall to collect more first party data on its readers. [Digiday] From the article: "The revenue earned from a known user versus an unknown user is about 169% greater from the additional first-party data and advertising revenue the company is able to earn from them." My private Facebook group is closing in on 700 membersI’m constantly amazed by the amount of expertise and the quality of discussion I see in the group. You can join over here: [Facebook] You’re a free subscriber to Simon Owens's Media Newsletter. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. |
Older messages
Don’t always believe publisher spin on the evils of Big Tech
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
Publishers have become adept at using the public's rising antipathy toward Big Tech as a vehicle for driving forward their own corporate goals.
The 4 hurdles micropayment platforms can’t overcome
Monday, February 14, 2022
Most publishers remain wedded to their subscription models and show no appetite for offering a micropayments alternative.
An easy way for Netflix to boost its growth
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
It currently generates billions of impressions each month on free content but doesn't do anything to monetize those impressions directly.
Newsletter writers need to focus more on revenue diversification
Monday, January 31, 2022
Most creators should probably have at least two or three business models.
Why I’m betting against CNN+
Tuesday, January 18, 2022
Reality TV programming doesn't attract paying subscribers, at least not by itself.
You Might Also Like
☕ All in
Monday, April 29, 2024
Why BodyArmor is going after “all the major sports.” April 29, 2024 Marketing Brew It's Monday. And yes, it's NewFronts week. Google presented this morning, and there will be presentations
☕ Here’s how to order
Monday, April 29, 2024
Shopsense AI—'Shazam' for shoppable TV? April 29, 2024 Retail Brew It's Monday, and as you're logging back on to LinkedIn to see what your favorite leaders are saying about the retail
SCOTUS hears Trump's immunity case.
Monday, April 29, 2024
Plus, a reader question about available beds for the homeless. SCOTUS hears Trump's immunity case. By Isaac Saul • 29 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser Former President Trump speaking at
Why we’re all Jacobin magazine subscribers
Monday, April 29, 2024
It's important work, and we want The Lever subscribers to access it. Why we're all Jacobin magazine subscribers By David Sirota • 29 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser Friends: Every now
Unstallable Attic
Monday, April 29, 2024
The Unstallable Plane That Stalled // Tales From An Attic Unstallable Attic By Caroline Crampton • 29 Apr 2024 View in browser View in browser The Unstallable Plane That Stalled Sylvia Wrigley | Fear
We’re not exaggerating. If people don’t pay for it, journalism will die.
Monday, April 29, 2024
Every journalist we lose is a blow not just to The Intercept but democracy itself. We wish we had better news to share, but here's the deal: Tuesday is the final day of our critical April
Teens and algorithms
Monday, April 29, 2024
+ Detroit's diversifying suburbs
⚡️ Inside the Rise of the Rabbit R1
Monday, April 29, 2024
Plus: Scientists discover a 10000-year-old megastructure under the Baltic Sea.
☕ Deputized
Monday, April 29, 2024
Are AI agents the next big thing? April 29, 2024 Tech Brew PRESENTED BY EnergyX It's Monday. Everyone in the AI world is abuzz about agents, which are more than just mere chatbots—they're
The Great Unknown About Conflicts Of Interest In Arizona’s Abortion Ban
Monday, April 29, 2024
As state supreme courts consolidate power and corporate money, shoddy oversight allows justices to hide their financial conflicts of interest from the public. A powerful anti-abortion group wined and